In post 562, KatyKimFanClub wrote:
I wonder how much of my scumreading iamveryhappy is just me getting pissed off at the random posts.
scummy gutping
In post 534, KatyKimFanClub wrote:
For example, they were pretty off topic at times but also got really mad over the entire chocolate bar thing. In fact, I'm pretty sure iamveryhappy only thinks Italiano is scum because he interacted with Invisibility? It all just seems like nonsense to me.
In post 567, ItalianoVD wrote:
In contrast iamveryhappy ironically didn’t seem very happy. Even my first interaction with him felt kinda awkward. The focus on what was considered RVS fluff posting between me and Invis is probably nai, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was done with a scum mindset.
In post 567, ItalianoVD wrote:
I could also vote for iamveryhappy and probably Princess, but I just don’t think scum would be that clumsy around a wagon the way Princess was. I could be wrong about that though.
feels like Italiano is leaving the door cracked open slightly. Also most of the defense isn't really defense
In post 579, Cook wrote:
i'm still not totally convinced on italiano, but the claim walkback is a face-saver in my book
partnery
I thought I had another reason to think they were partnery but I guess I didn't. Maybe Italiano's TR on Erinys is partner-y? Thus making the scumteam Cook/Italiano/Erinys via the associative property of mathem,atjciajrfes!
there comes a time in every young man's life where she must decide how she feels about the votes on Italiano as a result of his claim. That's kind of the reason I stopped voting him but mmm maybe that's not a very good reason. I think scum vote him here regardless and I don't know if I shouldn't just vote Italiano anyway
In post 29, Invisibility wrote:
there comes a time in every young man's life where she must decide how she feels about the votes on Italiano as a result of his claim. That's kind of the reason I stopped voting him but mmm maybe that's not a very good reason. I think scum vote him here regardless and I don't know if I shouldn't just vote Italiano anyway
I want to hear Cook's response to my question first I think
In post 579, Cook wrote:
i'm still not totally convinced on italiano, but the claim walkback is a face-saver in my book
really hate this post
like
the u-turn is really the thing that makes it worse
"I did it to show how much invis is town or smth"
why can't you just do it the normal way and NOT claim mason in the first place
In post 584, fireisredsir wrote:
ill let cook respond but that isn't how i interpreted that post
In post 567, ItalianoVD wrote:
Invis actually did/does feel like town to me and the mason claim was just an over exaggerated way of me saying that I really townread them.
I thought the claim might've been a weird but respectable (maybe) reaction test but this makes me think not-that and it's bad
I already thought basically all of what Black said about Italiano but I didn't even think about how Italiano definitely should have been more sus of my TR and of me than he was
In post 570, Black wrote:
I don't think IVD's strong townread of Invisibility makes a lot of sense tbh. I'm more inclined to believe this is an informed read rather than one developed naturally. And the mason thing just feels like a buddying attempt when I look through the lens of scum!IVD
Still planning on iso'ing this today to get a better idea of where I stand
I get that it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense but Italiano has stated that he reads off tone. I guess to me it seems like Italiano has a strong gut read that he can’t fully explain and I understand that. To me, his explanation when questioned about his townread was
I can certainly believe that Italiano's claim was a weird reaction test still tbh. That's not a good reason to SR him. That's like, super easy lol. Still I wouldn't fault townies for finding it scummy anyway
In post 659, Black wrote:
To me it feels like Invisibility is doing more this game than she normally does. I don't really know what a scum Invisibility game looks like but I've seen a few of her town games now, and in those games I don't remember her providing so much analysis. To me it feels like she's trying to get townread here when I didn't really get that vibe from her other games
In post 668, ItalianoVD wrote:
Re: 585 I always get amused/frustrated when people either meta me or ISO me and come out with a wrong read. I was gonna respond to the post line by line, but I chose not to because sarcasm and arrogance is a terrible trait, but it’s the only way I would’ve probably responded to it. :(
There was a lot of “I agree with this” “I like this” but in the end you voted me. Like you said you were gonna ISO me because people were asking you what you thought of me and it felt like the ISO was done to prove your scumbias instead of trying to see what the situation actually was.
this is a bad reason to discredit someone. You could think someone scummy but still agree with them
In post 659, Black wrote:
To me it feels like Invisibility is doing more this game than she normally does. I don't really know what a scum Invisibility game looks like but I've seen a few of her town games now, and in those games I don't remember her providing so much analysis. To me it feels like she's trying to get townread here when I didn't really get that vibe from her other games
I think you are trying really hard to look like you don't care about being voted and therefore you are towny because I really struggle to see this coming from any other mindset
I don't care about being voted. I know I'm town. But if you think I'm town then this vote doesn't really make sense to me...
I do not think Ausuka thinks you are town. Black has been having a lot of weird logic. Need to ISO this slot I think
In post 486, Invisibility wrote:
I'm done cooking (it's a pun this time) 380 is probably the most opportunistic vote if Italiano is town. Maybe even if Italiano scum.
In post 443, HighPrincessErinys wrote:
Really don't know what Asri's gameplan is in general, or why they're copying my speech pattern, actually.
i'm curious about that too.
Asri, answer for this.
these posts feel like a whole lot of nothing and I haven't been particularly impressed with most of Cook's play today. I especially don't like 449 cuz I thought 443 was kind of a weird shade and I think Cook just agreeing with it feels wrong (I think that exchange reflects poorly on Erinys too, but worse on Cook cuz it's a weird angle to look at someone from but even weirder to follow it I think). Plus I'm not sure how Asri was meant to answer there? It feels more like Cook saw an opportunity to dig at someone cuz I'm not sure what usefulness town could get from this interrogation or whatever.
pedit:
In post 481, Asri Teroka wrote:
The happy vote and Erynis sus on Italiano seem ok to you?
they don't!
this is why you are voting Cook. I keep forgetting lol
