Interesting. Yos2 has an FoS on him, with no name on it. That suggests that someone (presumably scum) have an ability to secretly FoS a player, and that it does have some kind of effect on the game. Either that, or Tar messed up the count again, but I kind of doubt it this time.
iamausername - why would you rather be voting SSK than Jex currently? They've both been somewhat lurkish.
"By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon
Macavenger wrote:iamausername - why would you rather be voting SSK than Jex currently? They've both been somewhat lurkish.
For the reason I FoSed him in this post - What he said there was basically akin to suggesting that we should vote No Lynch today because quote "town usually doesn't lycnh scum on the first day", which I'm sure we can all agree is a terrible strategy.
Elapsam semel occasionem non ipse potest Iuppiter reprehendere
I agree with iamausename on that count. That looks about as odd as the number 3. However, I am not entirely certain that he realized that that is what he was saying, as in a game where the mod is lynchable, then we would be getting something out of the lynch, though I do admit that it would be something useful to the town in all likelihood.
Now, life is civilized. Once there was a city, barbaric in its ways. Yet, they were an empire. But even before that, they were two brothers. They fought. Remus said ow, and it all began.
I'm not entirely sure, but I think that this votecount is actually correct across the board....
Now, life is civilized. Once there was a city, barbaric in its ways. Yet, they were an empire. But even before that, they were two brothers. They fought. Remus said ow, and it all began.
Ok, 'i am not a number comes' from The Prisoner which as far as i know stops the trait of the rest of them being Sci-Fi, maybe something has changed?
As far as i can see 'Smith will suffice' seems to also be a movie which does help with the idea that the theme of things has changed.
Musher-scum would not be clever enough to do something like this- Strife 220
Macavenger wrote:iamausername - why would you rather be voting SSK than Jex currently? They've both been somewhat lurkish.
For the reason I FoSed him in this post - What he said there was basically akin to suggesting that we should vote No Lynch today because quote "town usually doesn't lycnh scum on the first day", which I'm sure we can all agree is a terrible strategy.
True, it is usually a terrible strategy. However, this is a differet type of Mafia. We should try out different strategies than normal.
MafiaSSK wrote:True, it is usually a terrible strategy. However, this is a differet type of Mafia. We should try out different strategies than normal.
Wrong, it's still mafia.
Unvote; Vote: Korts
(SSK)
"By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon
Why is it opportunism if I agree with someone on someone else's scumminess? Why can't we share the same opinion on it, do I have to find something else to vote mafiaSSK on?
I said that I understood the point that he may have been trying to make. I'm not terribly sure that that counts as defending him.
Now, life is civilized. Once there was a city, barbaric in its ways. Yet, they were an empire. But even before that, they were two brothers. They fought. Remus said ow, and it all began.
Battousai wrote:Why is it opportunism if I agree with someone on someone else's scumminess? Why can't we share the same opinion on it, do I have to find something else to vote mafiaSSK on?
True, yes, for starters. But would you think SSK lynchworthy for this single point? This point is purely mafia theory, specialized. And there are infinite points of view in theory.
Odd, I must've somehow looked at the wrong count when I thought MafiaSSK's FoS didn't count earlier. Oh well, disregard that, then.
Korts wrote:"Pretty much know" means about 80-90% sure. I'm not a hundred percent sure, but I think it's more than safe to assume.
Well, I disagree, because I don't think it's a good idea to lynch based on what you can assume about other people's role pm's, but I won't stop you from placing higher value in it.
With this setup, I'm not 100% confident in anything. YES I base this idea on something, NO I don't feel like telling you what it is I base it on.
Fair enough. Could you answer this though; do you have an in-game reason, or is it strictly meta? I don't expect you to provide the specific reason if it's in-game.
Because in BM's case, I just chose a scummer at random out of those not involved in this game.
Ok.
iamausername wrote:
MafiaSSK wrote:Yes [we should try lynching the mod]. Since town usually doesn't lycnh scum on the first day.
Do not like this.
FoS: MafiaSSK
.
iamausername wrote:For the reason I FoSed him in this post - What he said there was basically akin to suggesting that we should vote No Lynch today because quote "town usually doesn't lycnh scum on the first day", which I'm sure we can all agree is a terrible strategy.
But he didn't actually suggest a no lynch, he suggested lynching the mod. Which, according to Korts (if I understand him correctly) is more like a random lynch. Which is even worse.
MafiaSSK, despite Korts confirmation that he's got a reason for saying that lynching the mod will lead to someone else dying instead of him, you have neither retracted your position on this nor unvoted Tarhalindur. Care to clarify your stand? For that matter, do you think Korts is right/wrong?
remusshadow wrote: as in a game where the mod is lynchable, then we would be getting something out of the lynch, though I do admit that it would be something useful to the town in all likelihood.
I'm not sure if I understand you correctly, are you saying that you think lynching the mod would be useful to the town?
iamausername wrote:For the reason I FoSed him in this post - What he said there was basically akin to suggesting that we should vote No Lynch today because quote "town usually doesn't lycnh scum on the first day", which I'm sure we can all agree is a terrible strategy.
But he didn't actually suggest a no lynch, he suggested lynching the mod. Which, according to Korts (if I understand him correctly) is more like a random lynch. Which is even worse.
I didn't mean to suggest that SSK was actually advocating a no lynch (I'm sure lynching the mod will have more effect than that), merely that his reasoning for voting Tar was just as faulty as that same reasoning would be if applied to a vote of no lynch.
P.S., Tar, I believe my name should be in front of Korts and SSK should have a (3) next to his.
Once again, the omniscient proves that he cannot make a proper vote count to save his life. Eighth, Nine, and Tenth Vote Counts repaired. - Tar
Elapsam semel occasionem non ipse potest Iuppiter reprehendere
I mean lynching the mod will be more useful to the town than not lynching.
Now, life is civilized. Once there was a city, barbaric in its ways. Yet, they were an empire. But even before that, they were two brothers. They fought. Remus said ow, and it all began.
MafiaSSK wrote:Yes [we should try lynching the mod]. Since town usually doesn't lycnh scum on the first day.
Do not like this.
FoS: MafiaSSK
.
iamausername wrote:For the reason I FoSed him in this post - What he said there was basically akin to suggesting that we should vote No Lynch today because quote "town usually doesn't lycnh scum on the first day", which I'm sure we can all agree is a terrible strategy.
But he didn't actually suggest a no lynch, he suggested lynching the mod. Which, according to Korts (if I understand him correctly) is more like a random lynch. Which is even worse.
MafiaSSK, despite Korts confirmation that he's got a reason for saying that lynching the mod will lead to someone else dying instead of him, you have neither retracted your position on this nor unvoted Tarhalindur. Care to clarify your stand? For that matter, do you think Korts is right/wrong?
I didn't realize there was a confirmation. So since he confirmed it, I'll believe him and
Korts wrote:"Pretty much know" means about 80-90% sure. I'm not a hundred percent sure, but I think it's more than safe to assume.
Well, I disagree, because I don't think it's a good idea to lynch based on what you can assume about other people's role pm's, but I won't stop you from placing higher value in it.
I may be wrong, and I'm certainly not going to lynch over this single point, but the PM was pretty indicative of this format.
Cavebear with a toothache wrote:
With this setup, I'm not 100% confident in anything. YES I base this idea on something, NO I don't feel like telling you what it is I base it on.
Fair enough. Could you answer this though; do you have an in-game reason, or is it strictly meta? I don't expect you to provide the specific reason if it's in-game.
In-game, definitely. I'm not sure how you imagine meta reasoning for the mod's lynch causing someone else's death.
Cavebear with a toothache wrote:
iamausername wrote:
MafiaSSK wrote:Yes [we should try lynching the mod]. Since town usually doesn't lycnh scum on the first day.
Do not like this.
FoS: MafiaSSK
.
iamausername wrote:For the reason I FoSed him in this post - What he said there was basically akin to suggesting that we should vote No Lynch today because quote "town usually doesn't lycnh scum on the first day", which I'm sure we can all agree is a terrible strategy.
But he didn't actually suggest a no lynch, he suggested lynching the mod. Which, according to Korts (if I understand him correctly) is more like a random lynch. Which is even worse.
Nonono. Not random. A specific player, if I'm right.
Korts wrote:"Pretty much know" means about 80-90% sure. I'm not a hundred percent sure, but I think it's more than safe to assume.
Well, I disagree, because I don't think it's a good idea to lynch based on what you can assume about other people's role pm's, but I won't stop you from placing higher value in it.
I may be wrong, and I'm certainly not going to lynch over this single point, but the PM was pretty indicative of this format.
Korts wrote:
iamausername wrote:
MafiaSSK wrote:Yes [we should try lynching the mod]. Since town usually doesn't lycnh scum on the first day.
Do not like this.
FoS: MafiaSSK
.
iamausername wrote:For the reason I FoSed him in this post - What he said there was basically akin to suggesting that we should vote No Lynch today because quote "town usually doesn't lycnh scum on the first day", which I'm sure we can all agree is a terrible strategy.
But he didn't actually suggest a no lynch, he suggested lynching the mod. Which, according to Korts (if I understand him correctly) is more like a random lynch. Which is even worse.
Nonono. Not random. A specific player, if I'm right.
I'm not sure if I want to just go and lynch the mod right away. From a player standpoint, it is most commonly the same as a no lynch. Then again, it could provide very good or very bad consequences.
