And this looks funny somehow cause it looks like you are saying you consider yourself looking scummy at the moment, and that you wouldn't vote yourself. Kinda sounds like you are saying you think you are scum.dahill1 wrote:people were accusing me of being scummyZombieSlayer54 wrote:Behold. The one time that I will NOT get angry at FlameAxe or JDodge for quicklynching/bandwagoning me.Flameaxe wrote:unvote vote zombieslayer
Policy Quicklynch. JD?
I should savour this moment.
Ok, Dahill, why are you attacking someone for VOTING you? The point of this game is to GET voted.
i can understand if TVOD was random voting me, but why would you vote for the person who is apparently scummy? if i were him, my vote wouldn't go on me at this moment in the game
_________________
Anti-HOS? Somehow that confuses me since HOS means Hand or suspicion. So you point your hand with suspicion at him or not? I think it will be easier for me to FOS or HOS those who I find to be scum and vote those I find to be town. That seems less confusing to me. And for the moment my vote is staying on ninja because this here is some good logic.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:Well, maybe that is the only thing he has to go on, so therefore he votes for you?
Just because someone does that does NOT mean they are scummy.
Anti-HOS on dahill1.
Self hammering is a powerful tool in this setup. If you know you are town and are at L-1 it is actually a good move as long as there is nothing else to be said Especially in lylo (or rather ly-win: lynch scum or 'win' in this game). One of the wonders of this setup is it does not allow for both mafiso's to force a 2 vote speedlynch win. They both have to be lynched, not just one of them. If we can find just one scum and keep that one alive, the town will win. We don't have to find both, but still we should find both so that we can win faster and better.TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:DG: No, not really. I mean, you didn't even try to make an argument, so I just sort of skimmed right over it.
In other news, I have a proposition: No one self-vote, because that makes it harder to get a consensus/come to a lynch, and we treat L-2 as L-1, because its in everyone's interest to self-hammer anyway.
Nocmen's plan here is sound. Odds are definatly in our favor of finding and lynching town. BUT if we find and lynch one of the mob quickly, we may loose info that could otherwise allow us to link together and find the two scum together. So statisically, yes that is a brilliant idea but in the long run it can't be used forever especially if we mess up and lynch one of them. If one of the scum is lynched the strategy falls apart and only the dead mafiso's alignment or voting habbits could point us to the other scum. I think discussion may be more useful in the long run so that we have more than just those 2 ways to find the scum.Nocmen wrote:I think a strategy we can do here is to just go and randomly lynch someone for today. We have a 11/13 shot at taking out a townie, why not just go for it?
It takes the scum at least 2 days and 1 night to win (2 scum and 1 town dead). It takes the town at least 5days and 4 nights to win (9 dead townies; 2 mafia and 2 town alive) We will need some longer strategy to get through 5 days.