The same accusation you refer to in post 46thevampireofdusseldorf wrote:What accusation are you refering to?Lalmtreasteek wrote:it was totally unclear that the accusation was baseless. Seems like you always assumed for some reason that the accusation was baseless. I don't understand why.
It is I who also do not understand!
Self-voting is one of the most retarded things you can do.Prof. Guppy wrote:Unvote
Ha! My self voting-strategy worked again.
But seriously, I don't understand why Llamatek, or whoever, is so keen on lynching me. I'm clearly not scum, so how come he thinks so?
And what exactly would that be? Voting yourself to get others to unvote? I've seen that work to the self-voters disadvantage several times. Later in the game, self-voting is seen as an act of defeatism and will often be added to the list of scummy things a person has done. However, this early, it probably won't do much harm.Ha! My self voting-strategy worked again.
QFT.killa seven wrote:im keeping my vote on you just for this post scumbag.Prof. Guppy wrote:Unvote
Ha! My self voting-strategy worked again.
But seriously, I don't understand why Llamatek, or whoever, is so keen on lynching me. I'm clearly not scum, so how come he thinks so?
I second this questoin, what exactly what were you expeting to gain from elf voting?MightyFireball wrote:And what exactly would that be?guppy wrote:Ha! My self voting-strategy worked again.
Theres plenty to talk about especialy the guppy wagon. trying to avoiding givving an opionion on it?Ration wrote:avinashv, you are correct in your thinking of me not posting yet, I will post more when we have more to talk about.
this is very good scum play to me try and set up one of your team as a possible cop early on this is part of the reason for me to claim so early and the guilty result on occult.Lalmtreasteek wrote:I think Occults question as a scum tactic is not so likely - do you think Prof. Guppy's joking response was reassuring? I think how you feel about this would determine whether Occult deserves an attack.If Guppy stinks consider that Occult might know something
I didn't "suggest Occult could be cop" he himself suggested he might have role information from his role when he said that! I thought maybe he was roleblocker actually.thevampireofdusseldorf wrote:I think Lalmtreasteek has already tried to suggest occult could be copthis is very good scum play to me try and set up one of your team as a possible cop early on this is part of the reason for me to claim so early and the guilty result on occult.Lalmtreasteek wrote:I think Occults question as a scum tactic is not so likely - do you think Prof. Guppy's joking response was reassuring? I think how you feel about this would determine whether Occult deserves an attack.If Guppy stinks consider that Occult might know something
Well, yes, that, but also, I wanted everyone to reexamine their reasons for voting for me in the first place. In almost every game I've played, I've drawn suspicion for doing something that, at least to me, wasn't scummy at all. After playing the 'woe is me' thing, they ask me to quit being so emo or whatever and ask me to defend myself. I ask what the charges against me are, and I answer them. Then, everyone realizes I'm town, and we can all go back to hunting scum.MightyFireball wrote:And what exactly would that be? Voting yourself to get others to unvote?Ha! My self voting-strategy worked again.
Actually, its pretty much the opposite.thevampireofdusseldorf wrote:If he had claimed before me it would then make my "im cop occult is scum" look a lot more unbelievable.
It isnt a good idea to let scum know who you're investgating. if they know you're investigating a townie they could nk him denying you the investigation Or worse they might have framerthevampireofdusseldorf wrote:As I said I saw Lalmtreasteek suggesting the idea that occut could be cop. If he had claimed before me it would then make my "im cop occult is scum" look a lot more unbelievable. This is my 3rd game started and none so far are past day one so I don't know too much of the nuances of this game yet. I was personaly reluctant to claim so early but given there was no nk we have a very good chance (if im sane) to lynch scum day one and get another investgation done. I do believe Lalmtreasteek is the best choice for me to investigate.
Trackers can choose a player at inght and see if who anyine else targetted that player. there are some a few others see the wiki: Category:Informative rolesAll you guys have to do is trust me day one and see if occult turns up guilty thus assuring me of my sanity, and obviously assuring you of my genuine claim.
If someone could help me by explaining a little bit about role interactions/observations.
What roles are there capable of viewing night actions, like who could see who was prtecded by whom or who was investigated by whom?
Sk would mean there is two kills last night and that were BOTH prevetned. this is not at all likelyAlso I assume that the doc can protect me night one and I am safe to have a second investigation and will only be nked when the doctor is found and killed by mafia, or if the mafia or a sk has a one shot unstoppable nk? (the second part I find rather hard to imagine in this sort of game)
Is it likely there is a sk?
again the scum should not know who the cop is targettingAnd if you guys would like to put in a unoffical vote to me on who you would like to investigate before we lynch I am happy to do the towns bidding.
Well given I got a guilty result on occult how could I interperate that occults question of guppy was anything but baseless unless guppy was also scum but who would give their partner such attention in the first page.Lalmtreasteek wrote:I would ask you again why you thought his accusation had to be baseless.
ok so you took thisLalmtreasteek wrote:I didn't "suggest Occult could be cop" he himself suggested he might have role information from his role when he said that! I thought maybe he was roleblocker actually.
to mean "I have role information (on guppy)" and what sort of rb did you think him to be and as a rb how would he then have info on guppy?occult wrote:I would like to question Prof. Guppy on why he didn't kill anybody yesterday though, were you blocked?
Seems to me you are worried about having an investigation done on you even though you say your not sure you like my claim, seems paradoxical to not be too keen on my claim but also worried about me investigating you.Lalmtreasteek wrote:I have no idea why, vampire would think he should investigate me, just because I thought somebody else might have role information!
As I said, he could potentially be a roleblocker. As in the role called roleblocker. So, on the first night, he could block Guppy. Observe no deaths. Try to find out if it because Guppy was the sent killer.thevampireofdusseldorf wrote:ok so you took thisto mean "I have role information (on guppy)" and what sort of rb did you think him to be and as a rb how would he then have info on guppy?occult wrote:I would like to question Prof. Guppy on why he didn't kill anybody yesterday though, were you blocked?
I clarify then: I don't see why you suspected me as scum when you wrote post 66. I think my respponse to Occult's accusation, I.E. not assume its just nothing, is the natural one.Seems to me you are worried about having an investigation done on you even though you say your not sure you like my claim, seems paradoxical to not be too keen on my claim but also worried about me investigating you.Lalmtreasteek wrote:I have no idea why, vampire would think he should investigate me, just because I thought somebody else might have role information!