[i]In Post 83[/i] Guardian wrote:To clarify, I have accrued two votes and one fos for:
Taking this game seriously
Taking comments in this game seriously
Wanting others to take this game seriously
Asking others to play this game
Is this a significant mis-categorization? Is there something I've missed?
Actually, those are none of the reason that I voted for you. Seriously.
So a significant mis-categorization? Yes.
Here is why I'm voting for you:
First: (a) you swithched you for to Erg0 without explanation [Post 24]; then, (b) when asked to explain, you reply that it's because of Erg0's "hang" comments, also because he's a "secret Aussie" Post 27; and, (c) you wonder why Erg0 is threatening with day vigs, then comment that he is the best place for votes (Post 43). My initial thoughts were just random stage chatter.
But then, you ask everyone to comment on Erg0's wagon [Post 65]. Which suggested to me that the above comments were serious. I didn't feel (and still don't) that what Erg0 did was worthy of a serious vote. And if they aren't all that serious, then I don't think I should have to explain why I am not on a random wagon.
As I said above [Post 75], I can't figure out why you were/are targetting Erg0 in such a way. It seems suspicious to me.
And now as Jitsu pointed out, it seems odd to demand that everyone explain their stance on Erg0[Post 65], when only a few posts later[Post 74, you don't feel he is most deserving of a vote.