Mini 550: KSFV: Game Over

SensFan · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:14 pm

ryan wrote:Yes an accusation on Page 1..........BRILLIANT approach.

I see what you did there.

You first claimed it is a scummy move to sit back, and then attack a townie. Then you accused me of being scummy for launching an attack on you page 1 when I saw something scummy.

So, which is it? Do scum attack early in the day, or sit back and wait?

ryan · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:50 pm

SensFan wrote: So, which is it? Do scum attack early in the day, or sit back and wait?

I don't know SensFan, what are you currently doing?

Unity · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:43 pm

aioqwe wrote:
Lloyd wrote:
Unvote

Vote GreasySpot
Just a weee bit of reason please?

GS's first game has a jester in it... He (GS) is town, but it's still ongoing... If that helps anyone...

Forgive me for losing track here. Are you refering to this game as GS's first game? Or are you aware of another game in which GS is playing, cuz while he's probably not scum, we really haven't established that yet.

aioqwe · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm

ryan wrote:
SensFan wrote: So, which is it? Do scum attack early in the day, or sit back and wait?
I don't know SensFan, what are you currently doing?

What do you think he's doing. Besides what's wrong with an accusation on page 1. All it can do is get us out of a pointless RVS faster which I have absolutely no problem with.

GS's first game is game with joker in it. It is still on-going tho. However, GS has already died (in that game) and he came out town. I'm reading some of GS's game as his behavior here seems an oddity.

SensFan · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:14 am

ryan wrote:
SensFan wrote: So, which is it? Do scum attack early in the day, or sit back and wait?
I don't know SensFan, what are you currently doing?

Going by your join date, you are a pretty experienced player, and you know better than to choose a target to latch on to, and then find reasons that person would be scum. Unless, of course, you know I'm not scum...

ryan · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:37 am

I don't know WHAT your allignment is

vIQleS · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:27 am

SensFan wrote:Just to clarify, the vote is because you feel I'm being too adamant in my attack on ryan, correct?

Sort of - it just seemed very vicious. I don't like or understand emotion like that this early in the game.

@all: I'm still here - weekend's been busy, as soon as I get back to work (where I have plenty of free time

) I'll be doing a proper readthrough and making some notes. And then hopefully some relevant contributions to the game.

SensFan · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:31 am

Vicious?

When you get around to doing your readthough, mind explaining that a little bit more?

pete d · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:39 pm

Vote Count

Greasy Spot (2): Joubert, Lloyd
ryan (2): SensFan, aioqwe
armlx (1): Unity
Lloyd (1): ryan
Rosso Carne (1): thinktank
SensFan (1): vIQleS
vIQleS (1): armlx

Not Voting (3): Gnome, Rosso Carne, Greasy Spot

With 7 Alive, it will take 12 to lynch

Lloyd · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:59 pm

aioqwe wrote:Just a weee bit of reason please?

Since GreasySpot posted so quickly with role claims, I think his post restriction is fake.

If he's a townie with a post restriction, he would have posted less to minimize confusion, and he would rather be mod-killed than us wasting a lynch on him.

I doubt he's a townie with a post restriction. We can test it by putting him at lynch minus one, and see whether he opts for a mod-kill.

thinktank · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:31 pm

The GS has been playing I doubt he'd crack under a L-1 but its still a theory worth testing out because his claims are getting annoying. I doubt it will work but I definitely agree that its a theory worth testing out.

unvote

vote: greasy Spot

wanna talk yet GS?

Joubert · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:13 pm

Maybe he's actually trying to say something useful through his possible post restriction...
Let's decode his claims carefully...

ryan · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:29 pm

Unvote/Vote: Greasy Spot

I'm interested in something from him (of substance)

armlx · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:31 pm

Rosso Carne wrote:ignoring GS

thats just a shitty PR and hes probably town.

What he said.

FOS Think Tank

First vote is acceptable questioning vote. Second is clearly uninformed. You trying to use logic to band wagon someone with a PR is scummy.

Vote Ryan

Pinning GS as Jester, extensive exchange with SensFan is really scummy and chaotic, not town friendly things.

FOS Sensfan

When Ryan shows up scum, you are next in line IMO. Your conversation seems forced and empty, like a failed distancing attempt.

armlx · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:32 pm

WOW, simul posted FTW. More fuel for my argument vs Ryan.

aioqwe · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:52 am

Just here to confirm my vote on ryan for his utter nonsense vote change.

What do you expect to gain by moving your vote? Since you ardently believe that he is jester and trying to get himself killed. Do you think him being close to a lynch will make him change his behavior? Furthermore, if you think he is jester why are you voting for him, so that he can win? Perhaps in reality you are a bit of scum trying to get in an easy lynch are happy wagon hopper?

Ryan popping up scum might 1 up the suspicion on SF but I don't think it pegs him on the wall.

GS isn't in any completed games. And in only one of his games has he died and had his role reveled (vanilla townie). In most of the games I think he comes off a bit scummy. However, he hasn't done anything such as role claim a post or such. Thus, I'm not throwing out the consideration of a him being inexperienced and not knowing how to use his restriction. Even so, he's on my scum list probably second or third...

Lloyd · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:55 am

Greasy Spot,

In a re-read, here's my latest thought:

With exception of you, we're all gamblers today. Joubert voting for you triggered a game mechanics event.

Care to comment with another post?

ryan · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:12 am

I really don't understand the playstyle of any of you in this game. First off you say that GS can't be a jester and that you'd all be shocked if he was, so I lay a vote to see if he'll stop this unamusing role claiming he's been doing and now I'm getting pointed to as scum? Well I'm sorry but I am NOT scum and just a townie trying to further understand why GS is doing what he's doing. Yes I do think him close to a lynch would change his behavior which is why I changed my vote. If he's just a regular townie with a horrible post restriction than I guess I'm wrong, but I'm not wrong for scummy reasons, I'm trying to understand WHAT he's doing.

thinktank · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:14 am

thinktank wrote:Lol Greasy spot, just lol. What is that your 5th claim in 3 days? I've lost count. It seems to me like there are three possibilities,

1) You are the jester and intentionally trying to get lynched which may be why you're posting so little.

2) you're playing a jester gambit when you're actually scum.

3) You're a townie but a terrible one at that cause you're not helping town, only causing confusion.

Of the fears that I have of you beign a jester are someone unreasonable just based on statistics as others have claiemd as well. Which leads me to believe that you are either scum or just a bad townie. either way you're not helping town so i suggest perhaps you may want to start contributing relevant stuff before you get wagoned.

I didn't jump wagons or pile on the wagon. I was about to start it soon, someone just beat me to it. I was waiting for a response from GS but since he deosnt seem to be responding adding pressure should do the trick.

Mr_Gnome_It_All · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:08 am

pete d wrote:With 7 Alive, it will take 12 to lynch

So either that's backwards or five of us are already dead and this day can't ever end.

And on a more serious note, I have an idea about GS. Perhaps his role is some kind of entertainer like an impressionist (as in a person who does impressions of other people, not the painter). I dunno, just an idea I thought I'd put out there.

Rosso Carne · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:55 am

huge

fOs: ANYONE VOTING gREASY SPOT

With my role and the obviously wacky role of greasy spot, I'm half tempted to ask for a massclaim. This game might be broken.

ryan · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:58 am

So Rosso, what would you like done with GS than?

Unity · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:02 am

Lloyd wrote:Greasy Spot,

In a re-read, here's my latest thought:

With exception of you, we're all gamblers today. Joubert voting for you triggered a game mechanics event.

Care to comment with another post?

Huh. Maybe. I thought he was saying that I had guessed his tactic, then there's that part where he said "He can not get his money until tomorrow", so you might be on to something there.

armlx · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:23 am

Rosso Carne wrote:huge
fOs: ANYONE VOTING gREASY SPOT

With my role and the obviously wacky role of greasy spot, I'm half tempted to ask for a massclaim. This game might be broken.

Sorry, I can't ever back a mass claim in a non-open game ever again unless there's a very very good reason behind it.

Unity · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:38 am

armlx wrote:
Rosso Carne wrote:huge
fOs: ANYONE VOTING gREASY SPOT

With my role and the obviously wacky role of greasy spot, I'm half tempted to ask for a massclaim. This game might be broken.
Sorry, I can't ever back a mass claim in a non-open game ever again unless there's a very very good reason behind it.

I can't even imagine what would ensue if we did.