?!In post 372, eagerSnake wrote:I don't really like giving more than a couple reads at a time this early on as all the reads are weak I feel like it helps scum manipulate
By the end of the day I will hope my reads are strong enough to state but they aren't right now
Yuck.In post 370, eagerSnake wrote:Because according to your reads list I'm the scummiest person here
also [wifom]If i were scum it would've been much easier for me to ignore/disengage or even make up some "notes" rather than say I didn't have any which is obviously scummy when I said I did. But I'm not scum so I just tell the truth about what happened and see if I can form any reads around that convo.[/wifom]
Nice superficial reads.In post 377, Leonshade wrote:Yuck.In post 370, eagerSnake wrote:Because according to your reads list I'm the scummiest person here
also [wifom]If i were scum it would've been much easier for me to ignore/disengage or even make up some "notes" rather than say I didn't have any which is obviously scummy when I said I did. But I'm not scum so I just tell the truth about what happened and see if I can form any reads around that convo.[/wifom]
Scumreads are RS and Snake, in that order.
VOTE: eagerSnakeIn post 378, eagerSnake wrote:Scum will take reads you have wrong and know which direction to push duh
Scum that you have on town will try to pocket you duh
Come on dude seriously you don't know how early reads lists help scum? How many games have you played in?
^Rhetorical questions don't worry you don't have to answer to them
&& you will learn that I don't like answering to people
Why you guys are so worried about me and not caring about fuckers like Not_Mafia not doing shit is beyond me.
what gave you the impression that I'm garbage?In post 385, eagerSnake wrote:You guys are garbage or scum? Huh?
In post 382, eagerSnake wrote:Lol
In post 384, eagerSnake wrote:What
Did you remember to start twilight trolling in case the vig is fake?In post 385, eagerSnake wrote:You guys are garbage or scum? Huh?
In post 387, Leonshade wrote:Did you remember to start twilight trolling in case the vig is fake?
Superficial straw manIn post 390, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:"Hey, why aren't you guys scum reading me"
Why should we scum read you?
"because I'm always scum read, at least usually"
Well you've done nothing so far, what have you done
"I made some notes but not in game"
Let's see those notes
"nahhhhh"
you sure?
"yeahhhhhh'
seriously?
"nahhhhhh"
could you please?
"nahhhh"
just a couple
"sureeeee"
"gives 2 notes about things already hashed out"
Those have been said before
"yeahhhhhhh"
You got any more notes?
"nahhhhhhh"
That's scummy, why?
"grandmaaaaaaaa"
bullshit
"Wifom i'm scum or nahhhh"
That's worth a vote/dayvig
"nahhhhhh"
That's you ya twit.
You just answered with saying the same thing. What was the thing you "posted what you posted" that you're talking about?In post 364, lane0168 wrote:"posted what I posted" referring to what?In post 351, eagerSnake wrote:The whole reason I posted what I posted was to see who would latch onto it.
N_M poked at it. E/A latched on.
Hey Laaaaaaaane, why did you drop the interaction here?In post 354, eagerSnake wrote:I felt the whole page 1 thing was rather townie while I witnessed it happening real-time.In post 353, lane0168 wrote:@eager what do you think is town about ragingspam?
Alisae and CK I have played with both of them as town and don't see or feel any noticeable difference here.
@lane this one.In post 213, eagerSnake wrote:I'm surprised none have misidentified me as scum yet. Similarly, I am surprised no scum have faked a scum read on me yet.
I have many other thoughts and opinions, but nothing worth sharing yet.
-Snake
Don't know, I can just wait and see. But your reaction was interesting. If the vig was fake, my vote stays.In post 389, eagerSnake wrote:In post 387, Leonshade wrote:Did you remember to start twilight trolling in case the vig is fake?
Do you believe the vig is real?
So Snakey is scummy for defending someone you think is scum?In post 377, Leonshade wrote:Scumreads are RS and Snake, in that order.
How are they superficial?In post 379, eagerSnake wrote:Nice superficial reads.In post 377, Leonshade wrote:Yuck.In post 370, eagerSnake wrote:Because according to your reads list I'm the scummiest person here
also [wifom]If i were scum it would've been much easier for me to ignore/disengage or even make up some "notes" rather than say I didn't have any which is obviously scummy when I said I did. But I'm not scum so I just tell the truth about what happened and see if I can form any reads around that convo.[/wifom]
Scumreads are RS and Snake, in that order.