Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 7:09 pm
why doesn't it make sense?In post 574, gerryoat wrote:^ that makes no sense lol
why doesn't it make sense?In post 574, gerryoat wrote:^ that makes no sense lol
And if I can?In post 577, mattblackguy wrote:I don't think you can do that quite as easily.
In post 437, Transcend wrote:Who the fuck is cooperative sheep when the fuck did they get here
I don't believe any of this outrage/emotion is genuine.In post 485, Transcend wrote:Gerry is mighty scummy i admit
I have explained this in thread already (a very quick recap would be intentional sheeping of top town read and not exactly town reading Grendel either). He was also a better use because we'd literally had about two pages straight of info to assess on Gerry as he'd just had that huge blow up debate with RC whereas we didn't on Grendel (and, I would note, that when he came back to pressure we got an immediate and strong reaction from Grendel and a lot of posts as well).In post 559, mattblackguy wrote:412 -- I liked this post, but I don't understand why you say you'd be happy to lynch Gerry, but then voted Grendel. Why was Grendel a better use for your vote than Gerry if you thought Gerry could be scum? At this point in time Grendel was null for me. I understand that you're name is "sheep" but Gerry also had 2 votes at the time you could have sheeped that wagon too.
Could you specifically quote/link one of the interactions you liked from Alisae and explain why you liked it? I found Alisae's posting during that period (presuming it's the blow up) to feel devoid of willingness to state an opinion, maybe you're reading that as unsureness, but I perceived reasonable chance of scum just not wanting to lock into a thought.In post 573, mattblackguy wrote:I liked his interactions with you, and RC. Just felt genuine to me.In post 561, gerryoat wrote:how do you tr alisae
Do you have experience/insight into how Alisae and Grendel generally play as scum/town that you are using to form your town read of them?In post 573, mattblackguy wrote:That coupled with I'm always a little more cautious with more experienced players because I don't know how well they can fake their town game puts you and Grendel at the top for me.
So you went back, read over the game, decided Gerry was probably scum, and also (my presumption) decided you didn't know enough about other players so wanted to pressure them (which makes sense to me, and I like your Transcend pressure) but you're also choosing to avoid figuring out the Grendel thing. That seems a little random, why are you trying to sort everything except Grendel?In post 552, Rautherdir wrote:As to why I never commented on Grendel's wagon, I didn't have enough information to make a read on Grendel.
And as to Gerry... I'm just going to ignore him for a while. I'll probably support a wagon on him later on though, when I don't have anyone else to bother. I'm trying to avoid the tunneling problem I had last game.
Anything else Trans? You're much less involved in this game than in any other game I've seen u in.In post 485, Transcend wrote:Gerry is mighty scummy i admit
Kinda disagree w/ this. Claiming to be a noob is something that can be AI. I'm sure u've heard the term "playing the noob card" as a scum tactic?In post 499, Cooperative Sheep wrote:Sure! I noted people getting all excited to apply newb tells to him, while failing to note that a newb tell is alignment neutral. They would even say things like 'he's either newb town, or newb scum due to X' while Rauth was actively claiming to be newb - which is a bit like saying I have a sheep for an avatar. Sure, it's true - but it's of no benefit to figuring out my alignment, so why bother bringing it up? I was pointing out that people were doing IIoA because they were saying things tht might look like scumhunting - but which are assuredly not.
What do you mean by "already" ? Like you suspected him before RC started to push him? If so, what were u suspicious about?In post 514, Grendel wrote:I'm probably voting Gerry since I already had a mild suspicion on his slot.
This isn't really true.In post 516, Grendel wrote:Not to mention that there has been zero resistance to my wagon.
In post 472, gerryoat wrote:lmao whenever you brag about how good you think you are, i'm gonna post this game
The thing about Rauth and vifam not mentioning the cop claim @ all in their accessment of RC v Gerry was a great point that nobody else had thought to bring up.In post 530, Grendel wrote:Enlighten me behind the genius of Coopsheep's opening.
Scum can make good points.In post 537, Vifam wrote:Yeah but like Grendal said on this page it's weird how he points out Grendal made a good point about Rau, but goes on to vote him without a word
I still think this is an unsatisfactory answer from Rautherdir.In post 571, Rautherdir wrote:I think I've already been over this... Oh. Hmm, I should clarify something.In post 567, gerryoat wrote:why do you think i'm mafia?
I think either you or RC is scum. I have said that before. I'd rather lynch you before RC because of RC's claim.
Why would seeing him purposely upset active players make you feel better about his alignment?In post 174, Keyser Söze wrote:Not convinced by Rauth so far. I want to see him upset an active player. Feels like he's trying to play a safe game. Once I see his teeth I may get a better look inside his soul.
By not helping scum.In post 183, gerryoat wrote:if i keep them to myself, how can i help town
Why are your reads good? How do you know Grendel's scum?In post 189, gerryoat wrote:how are my reads terrible? how do you know grendel is town?
No, your reply is the actually definition of scummy. Where's your vote? Where are the attempts to dig? Do you not care why he thinks Gerry is scum and RC is town?In post 390, JarJarDrinks wrote:Scummy postIn post 114, Rautherdir wrote:I have no idea what is happening but I guess it's RVS so I'll just vote someone.
VOTE: Akarin