Open 671: Greater Idea - OVER

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:13 pm

PAGETOPMOTHERFUCKERS

-Grey- · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:29 pm

Fushing fief!

alban · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:08 pm

In post 8, -Grey- wrote:Let's get this party started!

I'm Masons with RadiantCowbells and Lovers with Not_Mafia.

Crazy, I know.

VOTE: culted

This was a random stunt or you were hoping to achieve something more?

alban · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:10 pm

In post 15, bangthemafia wrote:
In post 8, -Grey- wrote:Let's get this party started!

I'm Masons with RadiantCowbells and Lovers with Not_Mafia.

Crazy, I know.

VOTE: culted
Overreaction.

WTF.

If you are a town, you have exposed not 1 but 3 power roles. Also you hav indicated that there are only 1 extra lover and only 1 extra mason assuming that mason PT and lovers PM will tell the list of all members.

So @Radiant and @Not_Mafia, if you are town and know Grey is lying, expose him.

On the contrary, since there are multuple factions likely, each faction would be more interested to take out others before taking out townies. So scums are likely to claim citizens quite early. For now i hav eyes on you.

And for using a possible genuine reason as an excuse to make the RVS sound more like a serious vote,

VOTE: RadiantCowbells

alban · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:11 pm

In post 153, alban wrote:
In post 15, bangthemafia wrote:
In post 8, -Grey- wrote:Let's get this party started!

I'm Masons with RadiantCowbells and Lovers with Not_Mafia.

Crazy, I know.

VOTE: culted
Overreaction.

WTF.

If you are a town, you have exposed not 1 but 3 power roles. Also you hav indicated that there are only 1 extra lover and only 1 extra mason assuming that mason PT and lovers PM will tell the list of all members.

So @Radiant and @Not_Mafia, if you are town and know Grey is lying, expose him.

On the contrary, since there are multuple factions likely, each faction would be more interested to take out others before taking out townies. So scums are likely to claim citizens quite early. For now i hav eyes on you.

And for using a possible genuine reason as an excuse to make the RVS sound more like a serious vote,

VOTE: RadiantCowbells

Ignore the easier post.
Bangthemafia, this was an over reaction.

alban · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:11 pm

Earlier*

alban · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:12 pm

In post 17, Not_Mafia wrote:Why did you RVS in this set-up RC?

Why not?

alban · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:16 pm

In post 18, -Grey- wrote:
In post 15, bangthemafia wrote:
In post 8, -Grey- wrote:Let's get this party started!

I'm Masons with RadiantCowbells and Lovers with Not_Mafia.

Crazy, I know.

VOTE: culted
WTF.

If you are a town, you have exposed not 1 but 3 power roles. Also you hav indicated that there are only 1 extra lover and only 1 extra mason assuming that mason PT and lovers PM will tell the list of all members.

So @Radiant and @Not_Mafia, if you are town and know Grey is lying, expose him.

On the contrary, since there are multuple factions likely, each faction would be more interested to take out others before taking out townies. So scums are likely to claim citizens quite early. For now i hav eyes on you.

And for using a possible genuine reason as an excuse to make the RVS sound more like a serious vote,

VOTE: RadiantCowbells
So you scold me for roleclaiming on the grounds that it outs three (presumably town) power roles... in a role madness game, no less... then illustrate why my claim doesn't prove alignment at all
in the same post.

VOTE: bangthemafia

Why aren't you pushing bangthemafia for an answer?

-Grey- · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:19 pm

In post 157, alban wrote:Why aren't you pushing bangthemafia for an answer?

He's my top scumread.

Notice that nobody else seems to care about the answer, either? Maybe I'm wrong. *shrug*

alban · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:39 pm

I think everyone takes first few posts as not serious. Only you will know whether your posts were jocular or serious. Which means you should still try to get an answer from him.
That first post of yours.. that was for fun or some other motivation?

Charloux · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:39 pm

Are you saying that you don't mind the game not advancing? You can try starting discussion as well, no need to wait for others.
Ignore the fact that i'm not doing anything either please.

Charloux · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:40 pm

Got ninjad. @grey ^

-Grey- · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:49 pm

In post 157, alban wrote:Why aren't you pushing bangthemafia for an answer?

Why are you asking this question when bang hasn't even POSTED since my vote?

-Grey- · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:49 pm

In post 161, Charloux wrote:Got ninjad. @grey ^

That goes for you too.

alban · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:17 pm

In post 162, -Grey- wrote:
In post 157, alban wrote:Why aren't you pushing bangthemafia for an answer?
Why are you asking this question when bang hasn't even POSTED since my vote?

That's a circular argument. He is more likely to answer if you ask him something.
I don't think this is very important, so i will back off. But i think you should follow up with him.
I am more interested in knowing about your motivation behind your first post.

-Grey- · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:24 pm

In post 164, alban wrote:
In post 162, -Grey- wrote:
In post 157, alban wrote:Why aren't you pushing bangthemafia for an answer?
Why are you asking this question when bang hasn't even POSTED since my vote?
That's a circular argument. He is more likely to answer if you ask him something.
I don't think this is very important, so i will back off. But i think you should follow up with him.
I am more interested in knowing about your motivation behind your first post.

You don't know the definition of circulation argument.

You asked why I wasn't pushing for answers when the dude hasn't even HAD A CHANCE to show he was ignoring my vote in the first place.

Your question was bullshit.

-Grey- · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 5:24 pm

Circular* fu autocorrect.

alban · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:00 pm

In post 165, -Grey- wrote:
In post 164, alban wrote:
In post 162, -Grey- wrote:
In post 157, alban wrote:Why aren't you pushing bangthemafia for an answer?
Why are you asking this question when bang hasn't even POSTED since my vote?
That's a circular argument. He is more likely to answer if you ask him something.
I don't think this is very important, so i will back off. But i think you should follow up with him.
I am more interested in knowing about your motivation behind your first post.
You don't know the definition of circulation argument.

You asked why I wasn't pushing for answers when the dude hasn't even HAD A CHANCE to show he was ignoring my vote in the first place.

Your question was bullshit.

There's something known as lurking. Which can be dealt with by questioning. But as said before, it's your shit to clean up.

However, i have given you SEVERAL CHANCES. Why aren't you saying anything about your first post? Was there an ulterior motive?

VOTE: -Grey-

-Grey- · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:02 pm

OH NOEZ!

MY GRAND SCHEME HAS BEEN DISCOVERED AND THUS FOILED!

-Grey- · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:31 pm

In post 167, alban wrote:Why aren't you saying anything about your first post? Was there an ulterior motive?

Enlighten us as to the threat that exists for town due to my first post.

Is the number or identity of confirmed town compromised? No.
Is the number or identity of lovers (and thus prime targets for night kills) compromised? No.
Did I attempt to keep the fakeclaim after it had served its purpose and provided me a suspect? No.

Tell us, alban. Tell us all about my dastardly plan to further a scum wincon with my first post!

alban · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:34 pm

In post 36, Spade_Ace wrote:Nope. My role isn't less powerful. The revelation has zero impact.

It's a single word. The first part has something to do with where cowboys are found in movies. The second part has something to do with my profile pic.

Theatrical. I wonder why.

-Grey- · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:38 pm

In post 170, alban wrote:
In post 36, Spade_Ace wrote:Nope. My role isn't less powerful. The revelation has zero impact.

It's a single word. The first part has something to do with where cowboys are found in movies. The second part has something to do with my profile pic.
Theatrical. I wonder why.

In post 169, -Grey- wrote:
In post 167, alban wrote:Why aren't you saying anything about your first post? Was there an ulterior motive?
Enlighten us as to the threat that exists for town due to my first post.

Is the number or identity of confirmed town compromised? No.
Is the number or identity of lovers (and thus prime targets for night kills) compromised? No.
Did I attempt to keep the fakeclaim after it had served its purpose and provided me a suspect? No.

Tell us, alban. Tell us all about my dastardly plan to further a scum wincon with my first post!

alban · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:41 pm

In post 42, Spade_Ace wrote:Hey Charloux. Nice to see you again.

@grey I don't think it was shitty. I like being surprised.

My choice was pretty Wild....
.
.
.
wait for it.
.
.
.
... card.
It was wildcard. The only role whose revealation has zero impact.

This is so not you. The style I mean. I haven't read your games here to know if this is adapted specifically for ms. But all this drama is not you.

-Grey- · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:44 pm

In post 172, alban wrote:
In post 42, Spade_Ace wrote:Hey Charloux. Nice to see you again.

@grey I don't think it was shitty. I like being surprised.

My choice was pretty Wild....
.
.
.
wait for it.
.
.
.
... card.
It was wildcard. The only role whose revealation has zero impact.
This is so not you. The style I mean. I haven't read your games here to know if this is adapted specifically for ms. But all this drama is not you.

In post 169, -Grey- wrote:
In post 167, alban wrote:Why aren't you saying anything about your first post? Was there an ulterior motive?
Enlighten us as to the threat that exists for town due to my first post.

Is the number or identity of confirmed town compromised? No.
Is the number or identity of lovers (and thus prime targets for night kills) compromised? No.
Did I attempt to keep the fakeclaim after it had served its purpose and provided me a suspect? No.

Tell us, alban. Tell us all about my dastardly plan to further a scum wincon with my first post!

alban · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Mon Jan 23, 2017 6:49 pm

You are assuming that I found you scummy.

My questioning you was out of curiosity to know if you had a scheme to lure the scum. And my vote was not coz I found you scummy, but coz you refused to answer. It served the purpose. You answered. UNVOTE: