Mafiascum.net

In post 20, BBmolla wrote:VOTE: no lynch

Ayy

Are you voting no lynch because this is a new quirky thing you're doing or do you think it will be beneficial with the set up.

Also I said hi to you

In post 24, Aj The Epic wrote:

In post 12, Fate wrote:VOTE: Aj the epic

Scum used to be hard to find

*insert snarky response about you just being bad*

There's really no point in worrying about D2 already. If Vig shoots tonight and misses, then we'll have to mass claim tomorrow. That's about all there is to it.

There's no reason not to be aware of what we're up against and try to figure out what our best chances are.

I haven't bothered trying to break the setup as the vig/gunsmith introduce so much uncertainty, if nobody else wants to try I can later.

VOTE: Tammy

Don't like the opening posts. I'll review your games later to see if this is a me problem but those opening appeals read horrifically.

I've been awake for well over 30 hours and will be in transit for another 7, so you'll have to deal with Nacho for now. He gets to pick the icon, too.

-Prism

Rereading it's not quite as bad as I thought but I'll keep it.

-Prism

In post 27, Reflektor wrote:I haven't bothered trying to break the setup as the vig/gunsmith introduce so much uncertainty, if nobody else wants to try I can later.

VOTE: Tammy

Don't like the opening posts. I'll review your games later to see if this is a me problem but those opening appeals read horrifically.

I've been awake for well over 30 hours and will be in transit for another 7, so you'll have to deal with Nacho for now. He gets to pick the icon, too.

-Prism

It's definitely a you problem.

Just talk to your other head. You'll have to wait until tomorrow though.

But I would like for you to explain what about them reads horrifically? Like how do you not read that and go oh that looks like she has experience with my other head, maybe I'll talk to my other head about it? How does that not be a thing that enters your mind at all?

In post 13, Indigo wrote:VOTE: Littel Uzinomical Vertical

Hey LUV

Indigo I'll find out who you are eventually

It's obvious you know Nacho, that doesn't mean I buy the appeal. Me consulting with him later is a given.

-Prism

Also hi nacho, prism, and tammy

Hi Gamma!

In post 31, Reflektor wrote:It's obvious you know Nacho, that doesn't mean I buy the appeal. Me consulting with him later is a given.

-Prism

Okay have fun

What don't you buy about it? Was it the appeal itself or something else about it?

I think I'm gonna do RQS this game

In post 35, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think I'm gonna do RQS this game

Please don't.

My cat is snoring so loud. Thought everyone would like to know.

In post 21, BBmolla wrote:

In post 7, Fate wrote:Yo Molla are you town

Yes sadly

I don't remember you liking scum?

Would no lynching today be beneficial? We'd go to night with 13 people. The roles could act and we could maybe start day two with more information. Would that help at all or am I being silly?

Also I'm dwelling. Being home alone is no fun.

Losing a day 1 lynch would be absolutely awful from the side of advancing our knowledge of alignment. Like losing a day 1 lynch would suck for associative tells and just end up forfeiting whoever scum thought was the most town player.

I think our best bet is to just play and convince the vigilante to stay put if we mislynch D1.

Oh that's a good idea.

I think AJ is right about no lynching day one, but not for the reasons he suggested. I don't think any of that is really all that important for solving the game and can easily be done without the day one lynch. BUT roles would be going into tonight blind and probably have a better chance of overlapping, which we do want to avoid.

I'm going to stop thinking about this and try to find something else to occupy my mind. We just really need town to act like town this game if we want half a chance to win this.

I'm think a mass claim might break this game.
Am I wrong?

In post 43, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm think a mass claim might break this game.
Am I wrong?

I was thinking about that too. My only hesitation is that mafia has a two-shot role blocker. Granted they could only block one person a night, but we would definitely be losing a role and information.

In post 43, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm think a mass claim might break this game.
Am I wrong?

My thought was if we mass claimed we could ensure that the roles did not overlap tonight, but then there's the role blocker.

If we don't mass claim, there's the chance that the doctor can stop a kill and give us another day.

If you mass claim, the role block hits cop tonight and the kill hits doctor, probably. Especially since it's not in our best interest to vig. Ergo massclaiming day 1 puts us in a certain disadvantage, especially before any results exist.

In post 31, Reflektor wrote:It's obvious you know Nacho, that doesn't mean I buy the appeal. Me consulting with him later is a given.

-Prism

:looks at list of games they've played together: :obvious:

And I know I haven't played in a while, but WTF is with no lynching and mass claiming being bandied about as good ideas this early? Town points for AJ for not buying in.

Gamma Emerald, why would you want to throw in RQS at this point? Are you dissatisfied with the discourse in progress? What was your thought process that mass claiming would be useful?

--PA (I sign, nyeh)

I wanted to do rqs since I wasn't really feeling rvs