Page 10 of 61

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:39 am
by Persivul
In post 224, Aj The Epic wrote:Persivul I think it's actually more likely that it's just subconscious use of the phrase from Gamma, and Reflektor just used Gamma's wording to respond.
Could be (particularly with Reflektor), or could just be coincidence. The thing that made it worth mentioning IMO was the time stamps of the first two. They're just a minute apart. Also note that Gamma wasn't replying to LUV.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:14 am
by Randomnamechange
In post 222, Persivul wrote:
In post 207, Reflektor wrote:I think Fate needs to start playing mafia.
Randomidget too. He was on site yesterday but didn't bother posting here.
pfft totes didnt forget i was in this game dont be ridiculous

scum is fate, indigo, reflektor and shadonra

VOTE: fate

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:22 am
by Fate
This game does deserve some effort on my part. Vote well deserved

Which hydra is Nacho again?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:23 am
by Fate
AJ is town, my apologies. I see Nacho is in Reflektor

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:03 am
by Empking
LUV: Fate was the subject of conversation when BB moved. His reasons are - presumably - a mix of what the posts above him say.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:30 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 229, Empking wrote:LUV: Fate was the subject of conversation when BB moved. His reasons are - presumably - a mix of what the posts above him say.
My reasons are for Shondora's entrance which was on the same page. I'm not seeing the difference.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:50 am
by Empking
In post 230, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 229, Empking wrote:LUV: Fate was the subject of conversation when BB moved. His reasons are - presumably - a mix of what the posts above him say.
My reasons are for Shondora's entrance which was on the same page. I'm not seeing the difference.
Shonora's entrance was not the subject of discussion. Since that was the entirety of my point then the difference is very large indeed.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:53 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 231, Empking wrote:
In post 230, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 229, Empking wrote:LUV: Fate was the subject of conversation when BB moved. His reasons are - presumably - a mix of what the posts above him say.
My reasons are for Shondora's entrance which was on the same page. I'm not seeing the difference.
Shonora's entrance was not the subject of discussion. Since that was the entirety of my point then the difference is very large indeed.
Neither was Fate. Page 9 didn't have a main subject of discussion.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:26 am
by Empking
In post 232, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 231, Empking wrote:
In post 230, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 229, Empking wrote:LUV: Fate was the subject of conversation when BB moved. His reasons are - presumably - a mix of what the posts above him say.
My reasons are for Shondora's entrance which was on the same page. I'm not seeing the difference.
Shonora's entrance was not the subject of discussion. Since that was the entirety of my point then the difference is very large indeed.
Neither was Fate. Page 9 didn't have a main subject of discussion.

Shonora's entrance was not a subject of discussion. Since that was the entirety of my point then the difference is very large indeed.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:22 pm
by Fate
VOTE: Medea the Alien

I'm on harmony with lots of people and thata dangerous

Seeing LUV/Alien/shadonra as decent placea to start

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:46 pm
by Fate
Interrupted during my re-read, but this game is a bit difficult to get a grasp on. I mean Tammy/AJ are universally town read, and thats why Im not voting LUV right now because my reads were in the same place at the time of that post.


shadonra is making blatantly scummy posts and I don't really want to go that route just yet either. Empking is leaning town at the moment

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:47 pm
by Aj The Epic
...Why shadonra, when the only post was quoting your sentiment?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:14 pm
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 233, Empking wrote:
In post 232, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 231, Empking wrote:
In post 230, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 229, Empking wrote:LUV: Fate was the subject of conversation when BB moved. His reasons are - presumably - a mix of what the posts above him say.
My reasons are for Shondora's entrance which was on the same page. I'm not seeing the difference.
Shonora's entrance was not the subject of discussion. Since that was the entirety of my point then the difference is very large indeed.
Neither was Fate. Page 9 didn't have a main subject of discussion.

Shonora's entrance was not a subject of discussion. Since that was the entirety of my point then the difference is very large indeed.
Right, but what's the issue with attempting to make it a discussion by voting for him?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:19 pm
by Reflektor
In post 228, Fate wrote:AJ is town, my apologies. I see Nacho is in Reflektor
Going to need to explain this one. Flipping reads after a revelation that I should try harder is one of my trademark scum moves. I see nothing overtly town in his posts.
In post 235, Fate wrote:shadonra is making blatantly scummy posts and I don't really want to go that route just yet either. Empking is leaning town at the moment
Shadonra has made exactly one post. Empking on the other hand got caught with a case of the biased by LUV.

VOTE: Fate

Probably going to switch back to Medea later but this deserves more attention.

-Prism

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:41 pm
by Aj The Epic
What point does a vote have if you're just stating you'll switch it off?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:43 pm
by Reflektor
Draws more attention than a voteless post would. Switch back is likely but not a given.

Intent of the line was to convey that I still FoS Medea.

-Prism

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:53 pm
by Persivul
In post 235, Fate wrote:shadonra is making blatantly scummy posts and I don't really want to go that route just yet either.
WTF, he only has one post.

mod, can we get a VC?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:57 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 220, Medea the Alien wrote:Still Cabd.

I'm letting Penguin live her own mafia life; Tammy. It's not my place to get in between you and her; and I have no designs on yelling at you; and turning this thread into a slag heap of emotions. You won't have to worry about our slot for long anyways.

I don't think scum has daytalk (KBW is very oldschool from a brief mod meta flipthru); Persivul gets town points for noticing the crossover though. It is possible that the thread was open during the confirmation stage; so theory less likely but not impossible.
Yeah
Scum usually has pregame talk

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:59 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 226, Randomnamechange wrote:
In post 222, Persivul wrote:
In post 207, Reflektor wrote:I think Fate needs to start playing mafia.
Randomidget too. He was on site yesterday but didn't bother posting here.
pfft totes didnt forget i was in this game dont be ridiculous

scum is fate, indigo, reflektor and shadonra

VOTE: fate
Are these gut reads or what?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:43 pm
by Medea the Alien
Catching up from page three, but wanted to post this thought so it doesn't get lost (in the likely incoming wall): Tammy asked me if I had any ideas on what to do in this setup. One thought (that Cabd says hasn't been brought up) is that at the start of each non-Day One phase, every player starts their posts with a fake cop and gunsmith result, like so:

Results:
Cop: Keybladewielder: not guilty
Gunsmith: Neo: has a gun (or two) (or dozen)


This means that if those roles die later on (post-Day Two), we know what their investigative results are from beyond the grave. Also might be useful for dealing with scum counterclaims, as they have members to burn on that stuff. That's how I would suggest taking advantage of the heavy investigative mechanic.

(Hadn't thought about it specifically before Tammy's challenge, so feel free to punch holes in this suggestion, but if people like the idea we should decide to do so before the end of this day phase so we're not stumbling around leaving the investigatives exposed on Day Two.)

--PA

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:47 pm
by Gamma Emerald
So a hypo claim?
We need to make sure everyone (or at least a large pool) participates, and doesn't just do low effort hypos (like only giving on form of result per investigation).
I've also been told claiming hypo guilties is apparently bad. Is that true?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:58 pm
by Lil Uzi Vert
Not a fan of hypoclaiming, especially with the presence of a roleblocker.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:01 pm
by Medea the Alien
...that's the succinct name for it. :blowing off the rust:

Right, everyone would need to buy in and mix up the claimed results in terms of [not] guilty and [does not] have a gun so any real results don't stick out like a sore thumb. I guess the big issue is if scum can narrow down the actual PRs from this, but everyone is going to have minimum of one 'guess'/random result, so unless we get way unlucky and there are only a couple accurate results in the pool...

Other issue I'm seeing is if the scum get lucky and roll the dice on using a roleblock shot and hit an investigative, but that assumes they use a shot early on and leave that PR in a pickle. But given the 9:4 set-up we might just need to take some chances.

Alternative to all of that is to wait until Day Three and post two days' worth of results at a time, giving more wiggle room to the investigatives. Of course the doom and gloom outlook says we might have lost by then, so.

I don't think hypo-guilties are bad, but it's been a while and I might be overlooking something? As long as they aren't treated as legit until a flip.

--PA

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:11 pm
by Aj The Epic
In post 166, Aj The Epic wrote:[..other words...] In this game in particular I don't see much benefit to coordinating actions until the scum RB is gone.
Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Not a fan of hypoclaiming, especially with the presence of a roleblocker.
...

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:45 pm
by Indigo
Ill post intent to take to take part if that's the overall consensus.