Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:45 am
I see those two day deadlines approaching for multiple people though. Prod dodging here we come.
If we get a bit closer to the deadline and still don't have a proper wagon going then I'd be totally on board with this plan. Assuming enough other people are on board as well.In post 274, Creature wrote:Bah, I'll reveal what was my strategy:
We lynch the most unreadable players D1 and D2, so at LyLo we have players that we can read and go like "I'm pretty confident that guy is town, no paranoia" or "well, he's playing like he does as scum, so must be scum"
I'm not sure about this. Seems like you are just saying you are too lazy to actually scumhunt and you are just saying "let's just misslynch a bunch of people"In post 274, Creature wrote:Bah, I'll reveal what was my strategy:
We lynch the most unreadable players D1 and D2, so at LyLo we have players that we can read and go like "I'm pretty confident that guy is town, no paranoia" or "well, he's playing like he does as scum, so must be scum"
You agreeing with him isn't giving me good vibes.In post 277, Börk Börk wrote:If we get a bit closer to the deadline and still don't have a proper wagon going then I'd be totally on board with this plan. Assuming enough other people are on board as well.In post 274, Creature wrote:Bah, I'll reveal what was my strategy:
We lynch the most unreadable players D1 and D2, so at LyLo we have players that we can read and go like "I'm pretty confident that guy is town, no paranoia" or "well, he's playing like he does as scum, so must be scum"
Whatever you say I don't like the way you think. Also didn't you say that we should start lynching scum from now? Or is my mind flipping on me.In post 281, Creature wrote:If we lynch someone more readable that turns out to be scum, we'll still have to find scum between other less readable players.
But if we lynch someone hard to read, then we could have a LyLo with players that are more easy to read (aka more easier LyLo).
I don't belive that scum would be one of those unreadable players. Scum try to fit in with town. We should look for people who try too hard to be town. And for me one of those poeple are you.In post 284, Creature wrote:I most likely mean't "it's fine if we lynch scum now".
Maybe while we go for less readable players we might find one scum.
Then your tactic is even more useless.In post 288, Creature wrote:So far no player looks really unreadable.
All that's good an all, but in the process of you "eliminating" "unreadable" player, you might get town in an unwinable situation.In post 289, Creature wrote:I think your dilemma is scumhunt than townhunt. Though, mine is townhunt then PoE, "unreadable" players make it harder as I can't be confident enough to strong townread them.
Tonally, her posts looked faked. Additionally, all her content is either repetition of other things, with no opinions added, or otherwise scummy (threatening to put me on her "scum list" for reading her as scum). She seems to be avoiding giving an opinion on things.In post 269, keyenpeydee wrote:I do not see any reason why Indigo is scum.
Lynch the least townie players? This plan is certainly worthy of the several posts you have devoted to it /sIn post 294, Creature wrote:It's like if your reads are like:
Player A - Yourself
Player B - Very readable player and pretty town
Player C - Also readable and town
Player D - Looking town though already shined as scum
Player E - Looking town but then you remember he fooled you as scum lot of times
Player F - Player you're null on
Player G - Player you're null on but you know you'll eventually sort him
That where the holes in your theory start to crack.In post 297, Creature wrote:but then you look at Player E and wonders "shit is he fooling me again and Player G is actually just a town that can't post right now?"