Mafiascum.net

In post 248, Indigo wrote:

In post 242, Vijarada wrote:Basically I think Indigo is a scum because her entire activity is making points that others already made, voting for the newest player after selectively picking one of his posts, and unabashedly pressuring me for daring to vote for her. Nowhere is there any genuine scumhunting in any way.

Yeah, im not the easiest person to get along with and i come across quite scummy but i know my alignment and others will too if i flip and i rather you not be on the wrong side of the flip if you are town. If this is a TvT thing you have going on with me then maybe consider stopping it. Ill scumhunt when i find something i dont like. All in due time, rome wasnt built in a day.

I like this post. Town should be reasonable and this seems like that. Tho it could be scum trying to get out of a bad situation.

In post 249, Vijarada wrote:

In post 246, Pepchoninga wrote:I'm nit posting reads, does this make me scum?

yeah i have you as a clear scumread. strange that you've decided to defend indigo very hard, but obviously looking for interactions at this stage gets us nowhere.

Lol.

Ain't defending anyone pall. Tho his last post is more reasonable then your "scumhunting with no goal" has been.

You basically said that if aren't giving shitty reads early game, we are scum. And you couldn't be more wrong imo. I belive that scum are more likely to give reads early game and only modify them later on, since when if they make reads later on when we are in a deeper discussion they seem fake and is a very easy way to get a scumslip.

It isn't just about giving shitty reads or not. It's about not providing any content or discussion or whatever. All indigo has said is scummy and contributes little. With you on the other hand, you provide content and then hedge by saying "well he could be scum!". You're talking about things you like or don't theory wise but give no impression of trying to find scu., and when you do say something you make sure you dont commit.

In post 252, Vijarada wrote:It isn't just about giving shitty reads or not. It's about not providing any content or discussion or whatever. All indigo has said is scummy and contributes little. With you on the other hand, you provide content and then hedge by saying "well he could be scum!". You're talking about things you like or don't theory wise but give no impression of trying to find scu., and when you do say something you make sure you dont commit.

Excuse me for not rushing into reads and avoiding FOSing everyone. Lets all do stuff at our own pace and everything will be proper tidy.

In post 252, Vijarada wrote:It isn't just about giving shitty reads or not. It's about not providing any content or discussion or whatever. All indigo has said is scummy and contributes little. With you on the other hand, you provide content and then hedge by saying "well he could be scum!". You're talking about things you like or don't theory wise but give no impression of trying to find scu., and when you do say something you make sure you dont commit.

I will agree about Indigo, but Creature hasn't said anything that provides content too.

And yes, committing to one thing so early on is something that isn't good, because the chances of us getting into too much TvT situation is bigger, and we don't get anything if people just start to tunnel themselves for nothing. This is what scum want us to do. That's why I get into conversations, see how poeple think and react, form opinions and strike when I have a good enough picture of everybody (as good as it can be day 1) and have some SRs.

In post 254, Indigo wrote:

In post 252, Vijarada wrote:It isn't just about giving shitty reads or not. It's about not providing any content or discussion or whatever. All indigo has said is scummy and contributes little. With you on the other hand, you provide content and then hedge by saying "well he could be scum!". You're talking about things you like or don't theory wise but give no impression of trying to find scu., and when you do say something you make sure you dont commit.

Excuse me for not rushing into reads and avoiding FOSing everyone. Lets all do stuff at our own pace and everything will be proper tidy.

Are you my alt?

In post 256, Pepchoninga wrote:

In post 254, Indigo wrote:

In post 252, Vijarada wrote:It isn't just about giving shitty reads or not. It's about not providing any content or discussion or whatever. All indigo has said is scummy and contributes little. With you on the other hand, you provide content and then hedge by saying "well he could be scum!". You're talking about things you like or don't theory wise but give no impression of trying to find scu., and when you do say something you make sure you dont commit.

Excuse me for not rushing into reads and avoiding FOSing everyone. Lets all do stuff at our own pace and everything will be proper tidy.

Are you my alt?

You caught me! Might as well switch back to my Pepchoninga main account and let this alt lurk for the rest of the game.

In post 257, Indigo wrote:

In post 256, Pepchoninga wrote:

In post 254, Indigo wrote:

In post 252, Vijarada wrote:It isn't just about giving shitty reads or not. It's about not providing any content or discussion or whatever. All indigo has said is scummy and contributes little. With you on the other hand, you provide content and then hedge by saying "well he could be scum!". You're talking about things you like or don't theory wise but give no impression of trying to find scu., and when you do say something you make sure you dont commit.

Excuse me for not rushing into reads and avoiding FOSing everyone. Lets all do stuff at our own pace and everything will be proper tidy.

Are you my alt?

You caught me! Might as well switch back to my Pepchoninga main account and let this alt lurk for the rest of the game.

Fucking brilliant! Now who the hell are you

P.S. My gramma is better.

I am Indigo, child of wonder.

In post 259, Indigo wrote:I am Indigo, child of wonder.

That you are..

What do Chickens say when they fucking hate someone?

Bork Bork Bork Bork

I might try to analyze this Indigo thingy tho instead of defending myself to a (I won't say anything rude because I'm too good to offend someone) person.

In post 261, keyenpeydee wrote:What do Chickens say when they fucking hate someone?

Bork Bork Bork Bork

That was good.

In post 262, keyenpeydee wrote:I might try to analyze this Indigo thingy tho instead of defending myself to a (I won't say anything rude because I'm too good to offend someone) person.

Key, could you analyze Creature ISO too?

This thread is inactive for 1 day right now.

Good to know.

In post 265, keyenpeydee wrote:This thread is inactive for 1 day right now.

@Vij, Can you summarize your case on Indigo and why he's scummy?

I do not see any reason why Indigo is scum.

Also, I do not have any solid reads aside from Pep who's my town read. the rest are null. Vij is leaning town so as Bork (Even I dislike her).

This game goes nowhere. Has it happened for a game to be closed? Cuz I don't see people having an interest for it.

Honestly I belive for now Creature seems the scummiest to me.

Keyen, I would be more than happy to figuratively shake hands right now and be more civil towards you for the remainder of this game. Deal?

To be totally honest, I don't think this is a case of lack of interest. I'm interested enough in this game, but I don't really have much else to say. I feel like doing a full analysis of everyone at this stage would be pointless, not to mention tl;dr; trying to convince people to move their votes would be pointless because I've already laid out my reasoning, and telling people to move their votes for the sake of it isn't really my style; and re-reading the game from scratch only to end up either repeating stuff others have already said or only making one or two very minor new points is... you guessed it... pointless.

I think we just need increased activity from a few more people and a more convincing bunch of wagons, and then we'll get going. Day one isn't really the most amazing part of a game.

Bah, I'll reveal what was my strategy:

We lynch the most unreadable players D1 and D2, so at LyLo we have players that we can read and go like "I'm pretty confident that guy is town, no paranoia" or "well, he's playing like he does as scum, so must be scum"