Page 24 of 54
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 4:37 pm
by Azral
The town ponders the use of minimalism as a narrative device in game posts.
No idea what anyone would like about that zefiend post.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 6:50 pm
by ɀefiend
Maybe because I'm one of the few people who have attempted to offer analysis instead of just active lurking, bickering, delivering one-liner unsubstantiated reads, being vague, or showing apathy for solving the game?
That's a rhetorical question by the way.
I noticed a few people had questions for me so I'm gonna read up now.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:26 pm
by Azral
Maybe.
I have a conception in my head of how you might play out the rest of the day as town vs mafia and I'm ready for either.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:27 pm
by McMenno
In post 569, Davsto wrote:Oh wow, an entire vote? Man, that completely erases any concerns about you not doing anything, crikey! And your entire reasoning, calling it a christmas miracle and nothing else, the true hallmark of someone contributing thoroughly to the game!
thanks
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:40 pm
by KainTepes
Maybe because I'm one of the few people who have attempted to offer analysis instead of just active lurking, bickering, delivering one-liner unsubstantiated reads, being vague, or showing apathy for solving the game?
That's a rhetorical question by the way.
I noticed a few people had questions for me so I'm gonna read up now.
this is a little UNKIND,,
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:43 pm
by Aristophanes
Kain, was most of that supposed to be a quote and how to did you Ness that up!?
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:30 am
by FrankJaeger
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 2:55 am
by lane0168
In post 438, FrankJaeger wrote:To expand a bit on my lane read-
A quick ISO shows a fair amount of fence sitting. Stuff like "it could be this, but it could be this".
Pushing dreal over the questionnairrie thing like he did seemed forced but meh idk its D1.
He also talks about his own actions a little more than needed. Like hes subtly saying " i did this and thats town"
Hurry up Frank. You need to answer for this. I questioned and said I didn't understand why he was so against it. But the questionnaire has virtually nothing to do with my push. And I'm pretty sure you won't find any fence sitting, but that's funny you're fence sitting in the very next paragraph... And where, anywhere did i insinuate "I did this and that's town"?
Those entire post is total bull shit. And I'm looking forward to him providing any sort of basis for it
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:04 am
by lane0168
In post 400, lane0168 wrote: In post 376, Narna wrote: In post 274, lane0168 wrote: In post 240, Narna wrote: In post 238, ɀefiend wrote: In post 234, Narna wrote:Lane's question to Dreal seems like phony busywork.
VOTE: Lane
Even though it might have been the first non-RVS post made in the game? Someone's gotta get the ball rolling right?
I'm trying to get the ball rolling. Lane didn't really engage rvs at all, and he enters the game trying to break rvs by questioning something that didn't seem alignment indicative to me. Dreal's bit on Frank, and KT's question seem like more genuine attempts to break rvs here.
What is busy about it? You're quick on that I think. One post asking a legitimate question. Can you think of any reasons someone might accidentally pay more attention to votes on one person as opposed to another? You say I enter trying to break rvs. How well do you think town does if rvs never ends? I engaged rvs. I voted mcmenno. Then I saw something that interested me. Why don't you go look at the posts before and after my question, then tell me when rvs ended. Your accusation doesn't make sense on many levels. You might even call it busy work.
Who else is on your suspicion list that didn't really engage in rvs? Are kt and dreal on your list for trying to break rvs? Like you said I was doing?
Both of those votes that Dreal questioned were naked votes, and it seemed pretty apparent he was trying to get more than that out of people. The mcmenno association seems like a safe misrep to get a response and seem like you're scumhunting. The rvs thing was poorly thought out, and pretending to scumhunt fits better than "breaking rvs" considering KT and Dreal's serious posting was just before yours.
My bad there, but the point is still pretty much that the question falsely associates Dreal with Mcmenno.
I wasn't a fan of Snarky's "hurr modvote" or Frank's first joke from rvs. I mentioned that KT and Dreal's attempts at breaking rvs seemed genuine in the post you quoted.
The bolded, can you tell me how it falsely associates dreal with mcmenno? That may be true, but how can you know that our even imply that? There is only one way you could even imply that this early in the game. Town doesn't know. Scum know
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:05 am
by lane0168
And dreal still hasn't explained how his read on davsto went from town to scum in a matter of 1 post
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:15 am
by Aristophanes
In post 584, lane0168 wrote:And dreal still hasn't explained how his read on davsto went from town to scum in a matter of 1 post
It's because he's scum. JS.
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:58 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 335, KainTepes wrote:THANJK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!
Snarky what si your answer to the question DO YOU PREFER TO PLAY AS TOWN OR SCUM OR 3P??
I said 3p because I have little experience as the alignment
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:59 am
by Gamma Emerald
I see why dreal is being voted
anyone yall feel should be trusted?
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 5:00 am
by Davsto
In post 584, lane0168 wrote:And dreal still hasn't explained how his read on davsto went from town to scum in a matter of 1 post
dreal has not explained most of his actions and has largely relied on AtE for the vast majority of points he attempts to push - that is, he makes one point and then pushes it over and over, then just repeats it louder if someone counters it.
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 6:53 am
by Desperado
OK,
489 is two days old and absolutely nothing has changed. We have five days.
@ Azral, KainTepes, zefriend, dreal, Gamma:
Why aren't you voting one of dreal/lane/davsto? Your wagon/non vote is doing nothing but you also aren't doing anything to diffuse the leading wagons.
@ Davsto, lane
Seriously, stop voting dreal. Look elsewhere.
@ Narna
Your lane vote blows and you've offered two alternatives "if lane doesn't have any takers." Well, we're here.
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 6:59 am
by Davsto
"Stop voting someone who you think is scum and who also is the largest wagon"? Ha, nope. I'm keeping putting on the pressure and hoping that more people vote him rather than wasting their votes on the
literally 5 one-vote
vanity wagons. You know, like yours on Menno? It's not scummy, just painfully unproductive.
It's silly to go around pushing for a final wagon to occur so we don't get a nolynch, while your vote is parked on a player on which you're the only vote.
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:08 am
by lane0168
In post 589, Desperado wrote:OK,
489 is two days old and absolutely nothing has changed. We have five days.
@ Azral, KainTepes, zefriend, dreal, Gamma:
Why aren't you voting one of dreal/lane/davsto? Your wagon/non vote is doing nothing but you also aren't doing anything to diffuse the leading wagons.
@ Davsto, lane
Seriously, stop voting dreal. Look elsewhere.
@ Narna
Your lane vote blows and you've offered two alternatives "if lane doesn't have any takers." Well, we're here.
"why aren't you guys voting dreal lane or davsto"
"why are you guys voting dreal"
... Did you just suggest dreal as a viable wagon? And then ask why we're voting there? Cause that's weird.
What's id lynch Frank for his bs case on me. And I'd vote Narna if it was worth it.
But I'm staying in dreal, because I'm not voting davsto, and I'm not voting myself. Like you said. 5 days
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:08 am
by Desperado
I've given my reasons for not voting the leading wagons and for why McMenno is scum and I'm not willing to let it go. Dreal's been at 3 votes for over a week. It's not happening and you aren't pressuring him.
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:09 am
by Desperado
In post 591, lane0168 wrote:... Did you just suggest dreal as a viable wagon? And then ask why we're voting there? Cause that's weird.
No, I'm asking the 5 people who aren't voting one of the leading wagons why they aren't voting the leading wagons.
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:11 am
by Davsto
In post 592, Desperado wrote:I've given my reasons for not voting the leading wagons and for why McMenno is scum and I'm not willing to let it go. Dreal's been at 3 votes for over a week. It's not happening and you aren't pressuring him.
So you don't think
any
of dreal, lane, I, zefiend, Azral or Aristophanes are scum? And you're too stubborn to push a lynch which at least has a good chance of flipping scum and instead will push a lynch that you're certain is scum but is unlikely to flip?
McMenno is scummy as hell, but he can flip any day and is incredibly unlikely to survive to endgame. Dreal, not so much, and there's a risk that if I were to die that his lynch wouldn't be pushed as much as it needs to be. My vote is staying.
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:12 am
by Desperado
In post 594, Davsto wrote:So you don't think any of dreal, lane, I, zefiend, Azral or Aristophanes are scum? And you're too stubborn to push a lynch which at least has a good chance of flipping scum and instead will push a lynch that you're certain is scum but is unlikely to flip?
I could vote Azral, but I don't feel compelled to switch my vote right now, especially if the leading wagons disperse as I anticipate they will, which will obviously change the voting landscape.
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 7:30 am
by lane0168
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:27 pm
by Azral
Ok Desp. I'll back you on this.
VOTE: McMemmo
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:27 pm
by Azral
I agree that none of the top 3 wagons are any good.
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 5:27 pm
by xyzzy
you have reached the bottom of page 24.