Mafiascum.net

In post 324, Alisae wrote:Hey! I'm sorry!

And I don't like that mindset you have Grey. You mentioning Lynchbaits really comes off as self-conscious.

I suggest you find another victim, because this player list isn't going to mislynch me.

Oh yeah @Garmr

So it's a really common thing that I've seen for scum to do to bring up how their buddy is scum then start addressing someone lynchbaity and vote them. I've heard it expressed as 'FoS a buddy and lynch a townie' although I heard that from MoI who was using it horribly inappropriately and nearly lost me that game so I'd rather use a different word for it. At any rate it felt like he was trying to play lip service to considering that wagon while continuing to try to lynch town.

I don't want you to be sorry I want an in depth explanation of why you thought it was scummy that I was still voting Firebringer.

In post 326, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't want you to be sorry I want an in depth explanation of why you thought it was scummy that I was still voting Firebringer.

Okay. It's scummy that you were voting Fire because I don't see how it makes logical sense to be voting a townread.
Also that vote could have probably been in RVS in which case, mybad.

In post 327, Alisae wrote:

In post 326, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't want you to be sorry I want an in depth explanation of why you thought it was scummy that I was still voting Firebringer.

Okay. It's scummy that you were voting Fire because I don't see how it makes logical sense to be voting a townread.
Also that vote could have probably been in RVS in which case, mybad.

Okay, so it's illogical. Why is it . Why would be apt to be voting Firebringer for a reason that would not?

In post 328, RadiantCowbells wrote:

In post 327, Alisae wrote:

In post 326, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't want you to be sorry I want an in depth explanation of why you thought it was scummy that I was still voting Firebringer.

Okay. It's scummy that you were voting Fire because I don't see how it makes logical sense to be voting a townread.
Also that vote could have probably been in RVS in which case, mybad.

Okay, so it's illogical. Why is it

SCUMMY

. Why would

SCUM

be apt to be voting Firebringer for a reason that

TOWN

would not?

It's scummy because it's something I don't see town doing.
I don't see town voting their top townread.

I find it really weird that you remembered that my vote was on Firebringer but claim to not realize that the vote happened in an early stage of the game nor that it wasn't serious nor that my vote changed.

I can believe that you forgot that my vote changed but that just makes this feel like you fishing for reasons to vote someone.

In post 329, Alisae wrote:It's scummy because it's something I don't see town doing.
I don't see town voting their top townread.

I'm pretty sure I'm not the only person that does things to bait reactions.

RC could probably write a doctoral thesis on it.

In post 330, RadiantCowbells wrote:I find it really weird that you remembered that my vote was on Firebringer but claim to not realize that the vote happened in an early stage of the game nor that it wasn't serious nor that my vote changed.

I can believe that you forgot that my vote changed but that just makes this feel like you fishing for reasons to vote someone.

To be fair I did sorta just look at the most recent VC.

In post 331, -Grey- wrote:

In post 329, Alisae wrote:It's scummy because it's something I don't see town doing.
I don't see town voting their top townread.

I'm pretty sure I'm not the only person that does things to bait reactions.

RC could probably write a doctoral thesis on it.

Why does this come off as buddying RC?

In post 330, RadiantCowbells wrote:I can believe that you forgot that my vote changed

but that just makes this feel like you fishing for reasons to vote someone.

Look at the way he's been poking me lately, too. You ain't special!

In post 332, Alisae wrote:Why does this come off as buddying RC?

Oh, I totally am.

In post 333, -Grey- wrote:

In post 330, RadiantCowbells wrote:I can believe that you forgot that my vote changed

but that just makes this feel like you fishing for reasons to vote someone.

Look at the way he's been poking me lately, too. You ain't special!

Difference is I haven't voted you.

Why does this come off as buddying RC?

Umm, because it is buddying. It's actually making me pretty uncomfortable, not necessarily because I think Grey's scum but because I just don't like it.

In post 335, Alisae wrote:

In post 333, -Grey- wrote:

In post 330, RadiantCowbells wrote:I can believe that you forgot that my vote changed

but that just makes this feel like you fishing for reasons to vote someone.

Look at the way he's been poking me lately, too. You ain't special!

Difference is I haven't voted you.

It's called laying groundwork.

Shit or get off the pot.

There we go, that's the Grey I know!

In post 326, RadiantCowbells wrote:Oh yeah @Garmr

So it's a really common thing that I've seen for scum to do to bring up how their buddy is scum then start addressing someone lynchbaity and vote them. I've heard it expressed as 'FoS a buddy and lynch a townie' although I heard that from MoI who was using it horribly inappropriately and nearly lost me that game so I'd rather use a different word for it. At any rate it felt like he was trying to play lip service to considering that wagon while continuing to try to lynch town.

I don't want you to be sorry I want an in depth explanation of why you thought it was scummy that I was still voting Firebringer.

I can accept that as a possibility but that alone isn't really making me think obvious scum. I will keep it in mind through.

In post 336, RadiantCowbells wrote:

Why does this come off as buddying RC?

Umm, because it is buddying. It's actually making me pretty uncomfortable, not necessarily because I think Grey's scum but because I just don't like it.

Hey, you took a familiar tone with me first.

In post 338, Alisae wrote:There we go, that's the Grey I know!

Did you like how I appeased you there, buddy?

In post 341, -Grey- wrote:

In post 338, Alisae wrote:There we go, that's the Grey I know!

Did you like how I appeased you there, buddy?

Okay, you're driving me crazy with your tone differences.
Why are you trying to get me to vote you?

In post 340, -Grey- wrote:

In post 336, RadiantCowbells wrote:

Why does this come off as buddying RC?

Umm, because it is buddying. It's actually making me pretty uncomfortable, not necessarily because I think Grey's scum but because I just don't like it.

Hey, you took a familiar tone with me first.

I did but that's not the same as making post after post glorifying the legendary RC and his multifaceted achievements. I do like your pepto vote but can you vote anotora with us for now?

In post 342, Alisae wrote:

In post 341, -Grey- wrote:

In post 338, Alisae wrote:There we go, that's the Grey I know!

Did you like how I appeased you there, buddy?

Okay, you're driving me crazy with your tone differences.
Why are you trying to get me to vote you?

Why would scum try to get you to vote them?

In post 344, -Grey- wrote:

In post 342, Alisae wrote:

In post 341, -Grey- wrote:

In post 338, Alisae wrote:There we go, that's the Grey I know!

Did you like how I appeased you there, buddy?

Okay, you're driving me crazy with your tone differences.
Why are you trying to get me to vote you?

Why would scum try to get you to vote them?

Why would scum say "Why would scum do x?"

In post 343, RadiantCowbells wrote:

In post 340, -Grey- wrote:

In post 336, RadiantCowbells wrote:

Why does this come off as buddying RC?

Umm, because it is buddying. It's actually making me pretty uncomfortable, not necessarily because I think Grey's scum but because I just don't like it.

Hey, you took a familiar tone with me first.

I did but that's not the same as making post after post glorifying the legendary RC and his multifaceted achievements. I do like your pepto vote but can you vote anotora with us for now?

I figure scummies are given for a reason. Reaction fishing and manipulation go hand in hand. Seems logical to me. *shrug*

VOTE: Anotora

In post 345, Alisae wrote:

In post 344, -Grey- wrote:

In post 342, Alisae wrote:

In post 341, -Grey- wrote:

In post 338, Alisae wrote:There we go, that's the Grey I know!

Did you like how I appeased you there, buddy?

Okay, you're driving me crazy with your tone differences.
Why are you trying to get me to vote you?

Why would scum try to get you to vote them?

Why would scum say "Why would scum do x?"

Yes, why would they?

In post 295, RadiantCowbells wrote:

In post 294, Pepchoninga wrote:Kinda don't understand what you meant by waffy, but I guess you thought my arguments were shit. I understand, it was just what popped in my head first and since people were very keen on the guy and I hadn't really gathered a good opinion troughout reading his post on the way I desided to reread his ISO and others cases to make a statement on the situation.

No, not shit. It's that they lacked direction and you didn't have a clear thought process and that's very common for scum.

Honestly I would argue with you on that. I might of gotten some of my thoughts confused but what I was thinking was said very loud and clear. Having read Ano's ISO I have a slight SR on him.

@Rc I made a short summary of frozen angel before.

Do you think she is scum this game?