Page 28 of 128

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 11:59 am
by Nachomamma8
In post 672, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Nacho needs to explain his apparent post restriction (lets entertain the fact it's real :roll:) and any consequences because he failed to roll an f or r in a few posts.
No consequences yet.
Is therrrrre a rrrrreason you think that I'm ffffaking this post rrrrestrrrriction?

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:08 pm
by Nahdia
In post 673, pirate mollie wrote:And RC is right, nahdia is using buzzwords to pad their game.
The fuck does this even mean?

PZ's recent posts are sort of awkward but there's nothing actually scum-indicative that I see. Not liking SAD's attack on Zito, feels a bit opportunistic or whatever. But on the other hand I really really liked from SAD for whatever reason so I'm leaning town on his slot atm.

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:11 pm
by SpyreX
In post 661, Kagami wrote:
In post 655, SpyreX wrote:
In post 652, Kagami wrote:Don't worry, because Mollie used meta in 91, nobody will understand the hate on you for all those undertones.
Like i know this is english

But when i try to parse it i keep getting a series of whirs and oddly enough fart noises
That was me attempting to point out how ridiculous your explanation of was.
More clicks and whirs

Unless you're pretending what i said there isn't reference to sads nahdia 'meta' which proves my point

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:12 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 677, SpyreX wrote:More clicks and whirs
What are you trying to say

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:17 pm
by Kagami
He's trying to say that he thinks it's justified to dismiss a set of reasons for someone being scum due to the "meta undertones" underlying one of those reasons, and has taken the approach of hand-waving criticism of that, possibly because someone in his PT has told him that I lack presence and can be happily ignored.

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:19 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 679, Kagami wrote:possibly because someone in his PT has told him that I lack presence and can be happily ignored.
Really? And who would say that?

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:19 pm
by SpyreX
No i said the nahdia hate was nonsensical and based on some meta bullshit

Which it is

I'm glad you think I'd need a team plotting to figure that out and to figure out you're a non entity

Even out here in the bush we can skin a carcass

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:20 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 10, drealmerz7 wrote:Dunnstral already fishing and he thinks he's slick

btw, I have a small d

you have a big D
If you thought that Dunnstrrrral was ffffishing, then why didn't you prrrress him about it? It's something that you ffffelt strrrrongly enough about wherrrrre you brrrrought it up multiple times, so why didn't that botherrrr everrrrr trrrranslate into suspicion?
In post 81, drealmerz7 wrote:x10 when it is nacho
Why does me claiming that I have a post rrrrrestrrrriction mean that I am a better lynch? Ifffff yourrr answerrr looks anything like "you'rrrrre sneaky", then what gain would faking a post rrrrrestrrriction brrrrring me?
In post 257, drealmerz7 wrote:First, ^ this comes off majorly awkward to me, in a scummyway too. but that is not the main issue for me

the main issue is that, why are you not inclined to think they'd bring it up in 2 places? your stance is that scum wouldn't bother, but why would town bother? If I see something I think could be a soft or crumb, the last thing I do is bring it up and talk about it, that is, really scummy, so the defense of the action is scummy to me too.
This is you talking about why you fffffind Dunnstrrrrral's earrrrly rrrrroleffffishing scummy. If you fffffound it scummy, why didn't you act on it at all?
In post 395, drealmerz7 wrote:I have a little experience with nacho and I am much more inclined to think he made it up than not. Last game I was with him in he fakeclaimed something like a ticking-bomb in his first post to setup a D3 (or was it 4?) lynch on himself saying if we didn't kill him before that we were in trouble sort of shit (he was jester.) details are shakey, ask him for more
What does me lying as a jesterrrr last game have to do with this game?
As for missing post rrrrrestrrrrictions, I assume that Ffffffate is being lenient because rrrrrememberrrring to do all of this weirrrrrd shit to my letterrrrrrs while typing is diffffffffficult; at firrrrrst I assumed that he was missing them, but I doubt this is the case since everrrrrrryone has been so helpfffffful in pointing out wherrrrre I've missed them. Ifffff you'rrrrrre prrrrraying fffffor me to get modkilled, don't worry, I'm surrrrrre it'll come eventually.
In post 400, drealmerz7 wrote:but seriously nacho is probably scum and he's broken and crying in a corner that he rolled scum for this game that's why he's not around

he's been rolling scum tons and with how this game is set he'd be way more in it
This is the strrrrrong meta rrrrrrread that you have on me?
This seems a bit shallow when you don't know whetherrrrrr I've been rrrrolling scum orrrrr town a lot and when you've played a total of two games with me.

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:22 pm
by SpyreX
Nacho i beg of you please no pr discussion i need sanity

Give me the lifeline

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:23 pm
by pirate mollie
In post 665, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 607, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 604, pirate mollie wrote:I feel like I am not being incredibly unreasonable for wanting the vast majority of the game lynched.
Hi madam do you have a moment to talk about scum Zito?
I am sorry sad, I didn't mean to ignore you. I am not sold on a scum!zito have you looked at dreamz?

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:24 pm
by Dunnstral
hi mollie

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:24 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 683, SpyreX wrote:Nacho i beg of you please no pr discussion i need sanity

Give me the lifeline
Affffter thrrrree difffffffffferrrrrent people brrrrrought it up therrrrrre wasn't everrrr a way I was getting out without addrrrrrressing it in one ffffforrrrrm orrrrrr anotherrrr.

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:25 pm
by SpyreX
I know i know i just can't you understand

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:26 pm
by Fate
NO BETTER YOU THAN THE YOU THAT YOU ARE

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:27 pm
by SpyreX
I belive in the me that believes in you fate

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:27 pm
by Dunnstral
Hey guys, can we do this?

VOTE: Kagami

As amusing as that fake paranoia was, I'm not sure I like robotic scum Kagami as much as your town play

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:29 pm
by SpyreX
It can go in the list. Camn today

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:33 pm
by pirate mollie
In post 676, Nahdia wrote:
In post 673, pirate mollie wrote:And RC is right, nahdia is using buzzwords to pad their game.
The fuck does this even mean?

PZ's recent posts are sort of
awkward
but there's nothing actually scum-indicative that I see. Not liking SAD's attack on Zito, feels a bit
opportunistic
or whatever. But on the other hand I really really liked from SAD for whatever reason so I'm leaning town on his slot atm.
I mean it exactly what the fuck I said it means I am pretty sure that I was pretty clear.

the bold are generic buzzwords that you are using with zero thought behind I mean really how the fuck was was sad's vote opportunistic on zito, I mean how many votes does he have, like 1. in no universe does that = opportunistic.

also this whole high and mighty "I am too cool 4 u to play this game" is getting old. rc might back off after you called him a dick but that crap doesn't work on me.

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:34 pm
by Dunnstral
Hey mollie, what are your thoughts if you give Kagami a short lookover?

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:35 pm
by pirate mollie
In post 681, SpyreX wrote:No i said the nahdia hate was nonsensical and based on some meta bullshit

Which it is

I'm glad you think I'd need a team plotting to figure that out and to figure out you're a non entity

Even out here in the bush we can skin a carcass
can you plz try to stop pissing every1 off for 5 minutes and be helpful

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:37 pm
by pirate mollie
In post 685, Dunnstral wrote:hi mollie
hi dunn

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:39 pm
by pirate mollie
In post 693, Dunnstral wrote:Hey mollie, what are your thoughts if you give Kagami a short lookover?
how about you give dreamz a lookover cos that is who I am pushing

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:40 pm
by SpyreX
In post 694, pirate mollie wrote:
In post 681, SpyreX wrote:No i said the nahdia hate was nonsensical and based on some meta bullshit

Which it is

I'm glad you think I'd need a team plotting to figure that out and to figure out you're a non entity

Even out here in the bush we can skin a carcass
can you plz try to stop pissing every1 off for 5 minutes and be helpful
Give me camns head on a plate and yep.

Otherwise pretty sure you were on the little fanclub of well spyrex just isn't here

I am now

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:41 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 696, pirate mollie wrote:
In post 693, Dunnstral wrote:Hey mollie, what are your thoughts if you give Kagami a short lookover?
how about you give dreamz a lookover cos that is who I am pushing
I'm not gonna let drealmerz get lynched

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:43 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 19, Dunnstral wrote:@drealmerz take notes, not even beating around the bush on the soft
I'd prrrrrrobably fffffeel good about the sofffffft ifffff I knew what it actually rrrrrrefffffferrrrring to anything, but it isn't.

Dunn's contrrrrributions in the middle fffffeel underrrrrwhelming, lacking. People who arrrrrrre townrrrrrreading drrrrealmerrrr rrrrright now seem to be doing so fffffforrrrr style rrrrrreasons (the "he just says things difffffferrrrrent than how scum would" bit strrrrrrikes me as just that), his vote on Infinity for voting Staeg was lame and easy and his vote on SAD for ???? rrrrrrreasons is in a similar tier.

His interrraction with Nahdia earrrrrlierrrr that I hightlighted beffffforrrrre I'll brrrrring up again:
In post 227, Dunnstral wrote:back off nahdia
In post 238, Dunnstral wrote:Why did you vote me nahdia?
In post 259, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Nahdia
In post 283, Dunnstral wrote:Get off me now
In post 285, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 277, Nahdia wrote:It's like when One Direction sings about that girl and they say "I don't know what it is, but you've got that one thing". Dunnstral has that one thing, just like that girl. Except, instead of making him a desirable chick for a group of British boy band singers, it makes him scummy.
Well said


Sig worthy in fact........
In post 286, Dunnstral wrote:ok

UNVOTE: nahdia
It seems lazy to the point of being disingenuous; I guess I could be completely offffff with rrrrrreading the "get offffff me" bits as sofffffftclaims sprrrrrung way too earrrrrrly to be rrrrrreal, but iffffff this is all he has to say in rrrrrrresponse to herrrrrr suspicion on him, I don't see why he botherrrred in the ffffffirrrrrst place.

But, the main rrrrreason I'm botherrrred is just because therrrre's nothing therrrrrre; no town rrrrrreads ffffffrrrrrom the slot that I fffffind insightffffful, no scum rrrrrreads that have conviction, and nothing that looks like an attempt at it. Even the strrrrrongest stances he has don't rrrrrreally have anything behind them; look at the drrrrrrrealmerrrr rrrrread he's exprrrrrressed multiple times and how he interrrrracts with mollie about it; there's no rrrrreal attempt to convince herrrrr or sell herrrr, he just goes "Drrrrealmerrrr is town!" and leaves it therrrre.