Page 36 of 107

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 8:40 pm
by Superhans
Yup, that would have been my choice. Kop has been far less prolific with his posting too. Hope this is just his work schedule not a deliberate decision.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 1:48 am
by Kop
In post 873, Superhans wrote:@Dunnstral
Why are you so sure TB is Town? I think the logic behind his wagon is convincing.

@Gamma
is redundant. Just under half the playerbase is on you. If you could kill one of the following players who would it be? + Why?
K O P
R E A L O
S U P E R H A N S
D U N N S T R A L
This is twice I've seen you ask this question, what are you aiming to achieve?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:07 am
by Superhans
It's a way to ask for reads. Y do you ask?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:13 am
by Kop
In post 877, Superhans wrote:It's a way to ask for reads. Y do you ask?
I see a lot of questions that are the same, I was just wondering what you were aiming to achieve.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:24 am
by Superhans
2 =\= lots of.

U trying to discredit me m8y ;)

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:39 am
by Realeo
I am obese. People said obese people are 2 people in 1, thus I have 2 votes.

VOTE: Gamma
VOTE: ThinkBig

really sold me and it runs with my psychological reasoning.

So many to choose from.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:42 am
by Realeo
Although there is one plot hole in your reasoning, Desperado.

How does, ThinkBig exactly catch the signal "So you're traitor, AntiHuman? Sorry. I would back off."

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:16 am
by Desperado
In post 881, Realeo wrote:Although there is one plot hole in your reasoning, Desperado.

How does, ThinkBig exactly catch the signal "So you're traitor, AntiHuman? Sorry. I would back off."
If someone replaced in to a game and immediately started creating a completely bullshit case against me as scum, and then a couple pages later was like "LOL just kidding, that was made up just to prove that you could do that against anyone and at least it got a bunch of reactions! hahaha" I think I would get the point and back off.

Don't you?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:33 am
by Realeo
Sorry. Occam Razor.

VOTE: Gamma

I mean, I like the case. TB is my second scum. Both him and GE matches my psychological framework.

But to be honest, Desperado, no I don't?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:34 am
by Superhans
L1 I think, please b careful.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 6:35 am
by Desperado
In post 864, grapes wrote:
DAY 2 VC 002


Gamma Emerald ( 4 ) -
(Kop, Realeo, Superhans, Dunnstral)
ThinkBig ( 4 ) -
(Desperado, Gamma Emerald, Alisae, davesaz)
Realeo ( 1 ) -
(algebra)

Not Voting ( 1 ) -
(ThinkBig)

Six to lynch.
(expired on 2017-01-21 05:24:02) remain until deadline.
No, this VC is still correct the order on Gamma is just different now. ThinkBig was actually at L1 for a bit.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:20 pm
by Alisae
Occam's Razor is fucking disgusting.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:25 pm
by Realeo
In post 886, Alisae wrote:Occam's Razor is fucking disgusting.
Occam's Razor helps you stay on the ground.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:36 pm
by Alisae
In post 887, Realeo wrote:
In post 886, Alisae wrote:Occam's Razor is fucking disgusting.
Occam's Razor helps you stay on the ground.
Scum can bait you into thinking that Occam's Razor is the way to go when really it's the quite opposite.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:39 pm
by Gamma Emerald
I think this is necessary for proper flow of the game. It seems I have a fuckton of votes parked on me rn.
I am a goon cop. I checked Realeo last night, that's why I wasn't really with the Realeo wagon at the start of today.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:39 pm
by Gamma Emerald
btw Realeo is NOT A GOON

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:39 pm
by Alisae
I don't believe your claim. Sorry Gamma.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:43 pm
by Dunnstral
UNVOTE:

So why are you parked on TB?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:43 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 891, Alisae wrote:I don't believe your claim. Sorry Gamma.
Are you counter claiming?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:44 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 892, Dunnstral wrote:UNVOTE:

So why are you parked on TB?
Because the fact he was SRing someone for buddying his SR was scummy
scum don't buddy each other

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:45 pm
by Realeo
VOTE: TB

That explains the unusual logic, Gam.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:45 pm
by Alisae
In post 893, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 891, Alisae wrote:I don't believe your claim. Sorry Gamma.
Are you counter claiming?
No I'm not counterclaiming otherwise I would have hammered.
It's just I really don't like the timing of the claim.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:46 pm
by Alisae
Like he was really sus up to it but just comes off as wierd to me.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:48 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Alisae I've claimed in similar circumstances before.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:48 pm
by Alisae
Eh, I guess I'll let it slide for now...