Page 4 of 107

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:40 pm
by Dunnstral
You fabricated that option. You're acting like it's either or between the two. I'm borderline arguing semantics here but you realize he was in no way limited in what he could do, right?

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:42 pm
by Realeo
You're acting like it's either or between the two
There's a 3rd option on creating conversation?

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:44 pm
by Dunnstral
There's infinite options. In fact he didn't need to start up conversation at all. You're playing dumb or I'm overestimating you

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:50 pm
by Realeo
But he did start up the conversation.

So ThinkBig starts with infinity decision, correct?

Code: Select all

ThinkBig -> ∞


He can post meme, he can naked vote. He can post Youtube Video

But he decided to initiate talking...

Code: Select all

ThinkBig -> Initiate talking -> ?


The ? is 2 options

[A] Accuse
RQS

I'm townreading him NOT because he start initiation. I townread him because he decided to start the initiation with RQS instead of accusation.

If you can provide the third way, englight me.

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:53 pm
by Realeo
I realize I didn't make it clear on the first post.

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:54 pm
by Dunnstral
You're acting like the only things he coul dpossibly talk about are RQS and accusing the wagon (a scenario you made up)

You can't be that dense

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:55 pm
by Gamma Emerald
I can guess at least 1 scenario
Not telling though

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:57 pm
by Dunnstral
Gamma it almost sounds like you're buying into this.

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:57 pm
by Gamma Emerald
I'm not

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:58 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 70, Realeo wrote:If it was RQS from the get go, I will discard it. However, we are RVS at the beginning, not RQS. The option to initiate RQS after RVS is interesting. I see that as a good intention, especially the question is mafia related.
This isn't real gamesolving, and actually hurts the town rather than help it.

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:06 pm
by Realeo
What can ThinkBig could say? He's a straight forward player, a get-to-the-business, not Transcend. If we're talking about Transcend, oh Hallejuah. I'm an idiot for making that argument.

I mean, I see your merit, but for
first impression read
, I feel good. I feel it's ok to be naive at the beginning.

For an actual read later, in the game, I won't be that dense. It would be more analytical. I set a standard for my read, but not from get go. Not from get go.

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:07 pm
by Realeo
You seem frustrated, Dunn? That's quite early to be frustrated.

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:10 pm
by Realeo
I found it interesting that you actually rebuttal my read instead of "stahp" of "You're an idiot"

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:11 pm
by Dunnstral
I'm just a mad person it would seem

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:11 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 87, Realeo wrote:I found it interesting that you actually rebuttal my read instead of "stahp" of "You're an idiot"
Translation: It's interesting that I engaged your points instead of just denying everything

Yeah I'm trying to move away from that.

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:15 pm
by Realeo
It's quite early in the game. I have seen frustated Dunn a lot but not this early.

In the old days, we just chill out, but when we get to mid-game, we became a serious analyst.

I'm just surprised that I triggered you THIS early. My, I must be that bad.

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:19 pm
by Dunnstral
Are you implying something?

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:20 pm
by Dunnstral
VOTE: Gamma Emerald

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:23 pm
by Realeo
Dunnstral wrote:Are you implying something?
At the beginning, I thought you are scum!Dunn trying to pocket me. Given the quite early confrontation, I only have town!Dunn meta and my meta of town!Dunn frustrated is not this early so....However, I have considered it as NAI (since you mentioned "I'm overestimating you", so I thought it's just play style confrontation, not over eager scum) and I'm just being paranoid.

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:24 pm
by Gamma Emerald
I want to trap people with a certain post, see if anyone tries to pull shit on me

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:26 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 93, Realeo wrote:trying to pocket me
Yeah definitely trying to pocket you, that's what happened in that exchange.

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:28 pm
by Realeo
In post 94, Gamma Emerald wrote:I want to trap people with a certain post, see if anyone tries to pull shit on me
Assuming the trap is already deployed, that's quite early to trap someone, isn't it?

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:29 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 94, Gamma Emerald wrote:I want to trap people with a certain post, see if anyone tries to pull shit on me
is it this one where you randomly announce that before anyone's done it?

Because that doesn't help you trap anyone. It's fishing for town cred.

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:29 pm
by Dunnstral
No seriously Realeo - where am I pocketing you? How?

Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:35 pm
by Realeo
In post 98, Dunnstral wrote:No seriously Realeo - where am I pocketing you? How?
My mind was like this. I didn't expect to have a serious exchange with Dunn this early, so I asked my self, "Why would Dunn try to exchange me?" I thought he tried to rebuttal me, establish "Dunnstral the town who tried to solve the game" etc. etc. Learning from my other games where (the impression of the people is) I am the one who tries to solve the game, it would be nice for scum!Dunn to buddy me and set the impression from get go.

When it was obvious that it's a play style confrontation, my mind "Oh, Ok. False alarm."