Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 8:29 am
Best guess, Kop hasn't read and unvoted in response to the prod.
Who said this?In post 374, davesaz wrote:Posted around 12:15.Posted around 2:19. (2 hours later)I think this looks like a player who arrived just after a VC and did catchup by iso of the players on the biggest wagon. The 2 hour gap shows that there was plenty of time to do that.In post 329, Antihuman wrote:Lol everybody who's sheeping the Gamma wagon "cause he posts fluff" should take a good fucking look at ThinkingBig
The catchup post has a lot more detail than I'd expect from scum trying to pick someone at random to push toderail a wagon on a buddy.
Not sure why y'all are reading it that way. I'm open to being convinced. Is there something wrong with the points in 329?
The fact that you haven't specifically said, what this bounce that makes you town read him, is?In post 327, algebra wrote:What's vague about it?
Anyone who lynches scum will be town read, if the whole leading up to, shows that it's town lynching scum, rather than strong confidence that one is going to flip scum, i.e bussing.In post 331, Antihuman wrote:It's only logical to townread people who lynched scum
1). I understand your point how it's easily manipulated, but some people have different playstyles early game. Some prefer RVS, some prefer RQS. It's NAI to me personally.In post 340, Antihuman wrote:@Gamma
1. RQS sucks because answers are easily manipulated and tailored to players
2. Dunn didn't look concerned with his 'wagon' at all. I wouldn't even call it a wagon
3. If it's TB's playstyle then he can easily incorporate it in his scumplay, especially that he's been encouraged by people being thankful. It's nai at best but I still don't like it
4. If I was going for a low hanging fruit, I would've just jumped on your wagon
Pedit this is a towny reaction. People should unvote gamma
I normally laugh this off, but you've managed to get a few reactions, even though it actually shouldn't.In post 341, Antihuman wrote:I'm tunnelling you cause I'm a daycop with a guilty on you
Unfortunately, he seemed to get one from you. You can't deny that he did, because you wouldn't have quoted him, to put him right.In post 342, ThinkBig wrote:Daycops are impossible in this setup. If you're looking to get a reaction out of me, you're not getting one. Sorry!In post 341, Antihuman wrote:I'm tunnelling you cause I'm a daycop with a guilty on you
What made you change from gamma to AH? Have you gone off Realeo?In post 364, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:@Desperado - Yeah, looked like really bad reasoning to me which is why I'm asking him questions. Didn't see anything specific about Thinkbig that would have made AH pick him off the Gamma wagon which makes me think his motivation there was to derail the Gamma wagon, rather than to find scum on it. I guess your vote makes sense, and I was going to vote AH when I read his TB case and looked into the votes on Gamma, but then I saw you vote AH and that steadies my hand a bit because your vote was naked and had just swapped from the leading (but losing traction) Gamma wagon onto the rapidly growing AH wagon. Anyways, as I write this post I realize there's better reason to vote for him being scummy than there is to not vote him because his wagon is moving fast.
VOTE: Antihuman
In post 352, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:AH what's your opinion on Gamma's vote on Desperado, and Desperado's sudden swap from voting Gamma to you?
Desperado, you switched from voting Gamma to voting the player defending Gamma pretty abruptly, can you further explain both of those votes because right now it looks like you're getting onto easy wagons
VOTE: Desperado
Why does Desperados vote steady your hand because it was naked?In post 364, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:@Desperado - Yeah, looked like really bad reasoning to me which is why I'm asking him questions. Didn't see anything specific about Thinkbig that would have made AH pick him off the Gamma wagon which makes me think his motivation there was to derail the Gamma wagon, rather than to find scum on it. I guess your vote makes sense, and I was going to vote AH when I read his TB case and looked into the votes on Gamma, but then I saw you vote AH and that steadies my hand a bit because your vote was naked and had just swapped from the leading (but losing traction) Gamma wagon onto the rapidly growing AH wagon. Anyways, as I write this post I realize there's better reason to vote for him being scummy than there is to not vote him because his wagon is moving fast.
VOTE: Antihuman
Not sure TBH. Possibly because I was the one that got the wagon moving. In any case, the wagon and my vote did exactly what I wanted it to do.In post 381, Superhans wrote:@ThinkBig
Out of 4 players on the Gammagon:
K O P
D E S P E R A D O
R E A L O
T H I N K B I G
S U P E R H A N S
¿Why Did He Go After You?
Excuses!!In post 382, Antihuman wrote:I do admit my case on TB may have been a bit overblown[/quote
You no say?
I've seen few interesting reactions, gonna elaborate tomorrow (this is the part where TB should shout: excuses!).
uh, don't?In post 382, Antihuman wrote:I do admit my case on TB may have been a bit overblown
ssbm and Desperado stand out to me as scummy on your wagon.In post 371, grapes wrote:Antihuman ( 4 ) - (Gamma Emerald, ThinkBig, Desperado, ssbm_Kyouko)
It's towny in my eyes cause I wager scum would be satisfied with having heat taken off them and just waited out the storm instead of making such a fierce push and risking backlash.
In post 347, Superhans wrote: Perhaps u shouldn't be tunneling if u have to resort to this sloppy and lazy trap.
This makes me question whether his reactions are genuine and original but I'm biased so you tell me.In post 349, ThinkBig wrote: When you actually have a guilty result on someone and don't have to resort to dirty tricks and traps.
I found his reasons weak, obviously. Need some time to judge whether his wagon hopping is AI or just playstyle.In post 352, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:AH what's your opinion on Gamma's vote on Desperado, and Desperado's sudden swap from voting Gamma to you?
That's actually pretty interesting. The question is what we get from comparing two completely different reactions: assuming scum!Gamma's being chainsawed by his partner/assuming Gamma's town who got cleared thanks to my input.In post 357, Realeo wrote:I can relate to the people who are getting town vibe from Gamma.
But I cannot relate to the people who are moving that extreme to the spectrum of "scum lean" -> "town lean"
I fail to see why'd you feel good about this. Isn't that clear opportunism?In post 364, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:@Desperado I saw you vote AH and that steadies my hand a bit because your vote was naked and had just swapped from the leading (but losing traction) Gamma wagon onto the rapidly growing AH wagon.
Well, she obviously thinks I'm scum with Gamma, which is rubbish. If I was scum, I'd be bussing the shit outta Gamma instead of painting a target on my back.In post 365, Superhans wrote:@ssbm
U ask him questions but vote him before he's had a chance to respond...
Also who do u think is AHs scum buddy?
What's your basis for judging the proper level of my self-confidence? We don't have history together.In post 369, Desperado wrote:We're reading Antihuman completely differently. I see confidence where it doesn't belong, not awkwardness.In post 361, Realeo wrote:My current stand is that Antihuman is like Superhans,awkward. Awkwardness is not explicitly a tell. =/
In the context of this game I felt like you were projecting overconfidence in your read.In post 388, Antihuman wrote:What's your basis for judging the proper level of my self-confidence? We don't have history together.
Apparently it's something he does every game so whateverIn post 393, Desperado wrote:What was scumThink doing with the RQS? You dismiss it as useless RQS bullshit, which is something I don't understand.
No, not for meIn post 394, Realeo wrote:Can I safely assume that those who vote AntiHuman thinks ThinkBig is town?
But I explained it...In post 389, Desperado wrote:Why are you convinced there's scum on a four man wagon on a town lean?
But I explained this tooAntihuman wrote:^this is a good observation. I'm not exactly sure what's the basis for Dunn's townread on me, apart from the fact he does townread me.
I wouldn't call that an explanationIn post 384, Dunnstral wrote: Your case was fine, pushing someone is fine