Page 76 of 107

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:02 pm
by Realeo
Like everyone disagree at something right?

Dunn thinks daveaz is scum.
SuperHans thinks Desperado is scum.
I think TB is scum.

Does TB has nothing to say? Does he only repeat what the mood syas?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:03 pm
by Realeo
In post 1872, davesaz wrote:What did you expect to get feedback from?
ANd what the hell is this? When you make a read, you just shut your ear and don't care what people say?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:08 pm
by Realeo
Do I need to make another pyramid quote to get people feedback?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:10 pm
by Realeo
In post 1750, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 1741, Realeo wrote:How do you ISO SuperHans *250*posts in 2 minutes?
Stop throwing shades. It doesn't take that long to skim through an ISO.
In post 1755, Realeo wrote:
250 posts in 2 minute is 2 posts/ second


Is that biologically possible?
Like, I don't see a reason for town to lie unless it's a gambit.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:10 pm
by Realeo
And ThinkBig is now dodging SuperHans question again the moment SuperHans is too busy with Desperado.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:22 pm
by Realeo
@davesaz
For your , I think I can create any narrative that I want to that conversation.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:23 pm
by Realeo
Judging by the fact he still sticks with Desperado, methink SuperHans is town.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:24 pm
by Realeo
In post 1849, Dunnstral wrote:I also think tb is towny
Lying is town action?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:43 pm
by davesaz
In post 1877, Realeo wrote:Do I need to make another pyramid quote to get people feedback?
On my old site, posting more that twice in a row would get you banned. At a minimum what it will get you from me is ignored. I hope not to have to make this point again.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 6:04 pm
by davesaz
In post 1880, Realeo wrote:
@davesaz
For your , I think I can create any narrative that I want to that conversation.
I would have thought you would like the narrative I put to it, since it matched your agenda. Did I misinterpret your reads?

Clarification on my previous post -- too many *consecutive posts without a change in subject* bother me. I don't mind multiple posts on different subjects, and I find myself doing that when I want to answer multiple points without multi-quoting and making a massive wall.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 6:07 pm
by davesaz
In post 1861, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1853, davesaz wrote:
In post 1850, Dunnstral wrote:I also don't see what you guys are seeing about dave
I'd be a lot more comfortable reading you if I could be confident you understand the concept of honest posting and could recognize it when you see it.
huh?
What do you actually think about me, and why?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 6:17 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 1882, Realeo wrote:
In post 1849, Dunnstral wrote:I also think tb is towny
Lying is town action?
:roll:

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 6:19 pm
by Dunnstral
I think you're mafia. Posts like this:
In post 1411, davesaz wrote:VT/

Dunn might be scum who realized I've got his partner dead in my sights.
While talking about kop when it didn't make sense (and we know he was town now)

along with the defensiveness that followed that

Do I need to go over your iso for you to understand why you're scummy?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 6:50 pm
by davesaz
In post 1424, davesaz wrote:Despite my otherwise head on playstyle, I do occasionally make tongue in cheek comments and employ sarcasm.

I fail to understand why people scumread it. My town play is so obvious it borders on being illegal.
All you have to do is accept that (aside from rare jokes and the occasional reaction test) I honestly believe everything I type.
I'm never afraid to be wrong, I'm never afraid to not know the right answer (more often, not have an answer at all).

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 6:54 pm
by davesaz
You (and that's personally you) lose games (specifically ones where you scumread me) because you expect people to act evasively so much that you can't recognize when they are not being evasive.
There is no conceivable scum motivation in anything I've posted this game. Of course not given I'm town, but any attempt to force read this as scummy has to come from either stupidity or scumminess.
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt instead of power lynching you. I suggest you use that opportunity to up your game.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:15 pm
by Realeo
In post 1886, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1882, Realeo wrote:
In post 1849, Dunnstral wrote:I also think tb is towny
Lying is town action?
:roll:
You are speculating tb is gambiting?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:21 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 1889, davesaz wrote:You (and that's personally you) lose games (specifically ones where you scumread me) because you expect people to act evasively so much that you can't recognize when they are not being evasive.
...I don't

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:22 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 1890, Realeo wrote:
In post 1886, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1882, Realeo wrote:
In post 1849, Dunnstral wrote:I also think tb is towny
Lying is town action?
:roll:
You are speculating tb is gambiting?
No, I'm speculating you're making something out of nothing

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:46 pm
by Superhans
@Realo,
Do you think TB's chronic lack of content and originality is necessarily scum? What else do you base your scum read on?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:47 pm
by Superhans
I think that TBs playstyles is difficult to evaluate, as his low effort low content posts ooze scum.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:50 pm
by Superhans
In post 1748, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 1720, Superhans wrote:@ThinkBig
Hit me up with some game threads when you played Town, and some games you played scum.
Scum Games

Micro 672 (Hydra with Pine)
Open 661

These are my only scum games.

Town Games


Micro 657
Micro 663
Mini Normal 1862 (one of my better games. Replaced late into the game)

All my other games are on my Wiki page.
As town he has been lynched D1 before. Idk y but I'd be hesitant to assume not defending himself makes him scum.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:36 pm
by Superhans
In post 1889, davesaz wrote: [...]
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt instead of power lynching you. I suggest you use that opportunity to up your game.
Lol I can see scum motivation in this post. Threatening Dunnstral for making a case on you. Id like to see you to go ahead and tell me
how
you'd power lynch Dunnstral.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:42 pm
by Realeo
In post 1893, Superhans wrote:@Realo,
Do you think TB's chronic lack of content and originality is necessarily scum? What else do you base your scum read on?
His lying. There is a legitimate excuse for that 250 posts/2 minutes...I can think one legit, but he just say "Stop throwing shade."

So he didn't deny the 250 posts/2 minutes.

And I ask if it's biologically possible.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:43 pm
by Realeo
In post 1896, Superhans wrote:
In post 1889, davesaz wrote: [...]
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt instead of power lynching you. I suggest you use that opportunity to up your game.
Lol I can see scum motivation in this post. Threatening Dunnstral for making a case on you. Id like to see you to go ahead and tell me
how
you'd power lynch Dunnstral.
Enlight me.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:46 pm
by Realeo
Someone.

Explain to me in plain English..

Why
consistently
avoiding question is towny?

The keyword is avoding. Not "small content". Avoiding.