I think you started this conversation about tacos to derail us from the target. Or you have a few screws loose in there. Which is it? Are you scum or an idiot like me?
If you genuinely think I'm trying to distract you from a target, why are you not voting me? That's a strong scumtell for this early in the game, but you aren't following it? Why?
In post 32, rb wrote:If you genuinely think I'm trying to distract you from a target, why are you not voting me? That's a strong scumtell for this early in the game, but you aren't following it? Why?
How would this look to you: "Hey! RB! Are you scum or an idiot like me? Well, it doesn't matter (Votetag)."
I also thought you were at L-2 at the time(maybe the mod counted it regardless?), so me not bringing someone to L-1 should be NAI. SO your premise for me being scum is wrong, thus your seriousness about me getting lynched is ridiculous.
And i also said before that we don't have tacos here, so i don't have an opinion about them.
Btw 28 Was supposed to let me see what kind of person you are, but your disregarding half of my post to call me scum gives me scummy vibes.
Seems like rb is trying too hard. Not sure that makes him scum, I have played like that as town when I was bored, but it's the only notable thing about the game so far.
Anyone have thoughts about the unique BASTARD mechanic of this game? IMO, we should just lynch any cop guilty, period. 66% chance of hitting real scum, and if we let a scum escape because they "might be the death miller" we just screwed ourselves out of a win. I'll say it right now: if a cop gets a guilty on me, you lynch me, it's just the correct play.
if youre the death miller letting yourself be lynched is fuckin stupid, you know youre town so any lynch is prefereable to yours
cop should be tryin to townhunt anyway
Reflect on yourself in the heat of passion to reveal what the cold eye of logic sees not.
In post 36, Road Kamelot wrote:
if youre the death miller letting yourself be lynched is fuckin stupid, you know youre town so any lynch is prefereable to yours
cop should be tryin to townhunt anyway
I brought up setup spec because it's a bastard setup, which means a lot of usual meta strategies are going to fail. Also, I have no strong reads and I want to get discussion going somehow.
You are twisting what I said. I said town should lynch the death miller, I didn't say the death miller should just give up. The death miller doesn't even know if he/she is the death miller, so... yeah there is that.
Your point is kinda stupid besides, like you think caught scum us going to just let themselves get lynched?
In post 38, karnos wrote:I brought up setup spec because it's a bastard setup, which means a lot of usual meta strategies are going to fail. Also, I have no strong reads and I want to get discussion going somehow.
When did i call u out for bringing up setup spec or not having strong reads
i didnt even mention that whyre you defendin against accusations that havent happened yet ;;;;)
Reflect on yourself in the heat of passion to reveal what the cold eye of logic sees not.
I get the feeling that rb was using dumb off-topic posts as a way to provoke some kind of reaction. I noticed that as soon as he felt he had a lead with Charloux, his grammar suddenly improved drastically and his arguments started making sense. This seems like a town-motivated way to try to get the ball moving and discussion going.
In post 35, karnos wrote:I'll say it right now: if a cop gets a guilty on me, you lynch me, it's just the correct play.
this is a lynchable post, regardless of your alignment this was a bad thing to say
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 38, karnos wrote:I brought up setup spec because it's a bastard setup, which means a lot of usual meta strategies are going to fail. Also, I have no strong reads and I want to get discussion going somehow.
When did i call u out for bringing up setup spec or not having strong reads
i didnt even mention that whyre you defendin against accusations that havent happened yet ;;;;)
Has anyone played with RK before? Does she always post like this? Kinda reminds me of killthestory, but spammier and less rational.
I'm just trying to figure out if she is being scummy, or if this is her typical play.
In post 35, karnos wrote:I'll say it right now: if a cop gets a guilty on me, you lynch me, it's just the correct play.
this is a lynchable post, regardless of your alignment this was a bad thing to say
Care to explain your logic? A guilty is 66% likely to be a true scum. You lynch that every fucking time, it's much better odds than anything else in the game.