Open 661: Pick Your Poison [Game Over]

[-Grey-]

Nah, I stepped away from the game man. I flew to close to the sun and I crashed.

The guy you're replacing was really town, do try not to fuck that up.

[Formerfish]

No worries, I can't not be what I am. Eminem taught me that years ago.

And I may be posting bullshitting with you guys because I am a lonely sad person, but I am also reading.

[-Grey-]

Right, they said the argument could be either TvT or TvS, but their most recent post seems to discount the possibility of TvT.

Just based on the ISO of the two, I lean more towards svt than tvt. In the event real flips town (which I would be surprised) then the next most probable scenario is Vedith/cheesy. The interaction between cheesy and Vedith seemed like scum buddies trying to distance.

Since you'd be surprised if I flip town, and suspect my slot's interaction with Vedith is SvT, that tells me that you townread Vedith.

This doesn't jibe with your assertion that Vedith and Cheesy look like distancing scum. If you honestly felt that way, you'd be voting one of them and calling me town.

VOTE: ThinkBig

Logical inconsistencies are indicative of fabricated reads.

More ThinkBig votes, please.

[LicketyQuickety]

Right, they said the argument could be either TvT or TvS, but their most recent post seems to discount the possibility of TvT.

Just based on the ISO of the two, I lean more towards svt than tvt. In the event real flips town (which I would be surprised) then the next most probable scenario is Vedith/cheesy. The interaction between cheesy and Vedith seemed like scum buddies trying to distance.

Since you'd be surprised if I flip town, and suspect my slot's interaction with Vedith is SvT, that tells me that you townread Vedith.

This doesn't jibe with your assertion that Vedith and Cheesy look like distancing scum. If you honestly felt that way, you'd be voting one of them and calling me town.

VOTE: ThinkBig

Logical inconsistencies are indicative of fabricated reads.

That is complete and utter bullshit!

[-Grey-]

That is complete and utter bullshit!

I was wondering when you'd get around to clarifying your previous response to my case.

Do go on, explain how it's bullshit. I'm all ears.

[Vaxkiller]

@LQ, waht policy did snarky break?

For anyone that doesn't know me, I Hate policy lynches. I would have a PL against PL's if I could.

[Vaxkiller]

What would have made this even better is if realeos replacement fought with Vedith's replacement.

[-Grey-]

What would have made this even better is if realeos replacement fought with Vedith's replacement.

Sorry bruh, not happening. I daycopped Titus and she's inno.

[LicketyQuickety]

That is complete and utter bullshit!

I was wondering when you'd get around to clarifying your previous response to my case.

Do go on, explain how it's bullshit. I'm all ears.

Some people make

apparent] inconsistencies and that has nothing to do with a fabricated read or not. And for the record I am not necessarily questioning the conclusion of your read but the reasoning behind it and you overall general philosophy of the way to get reads. I am challenging you on your reliability to get reads based on Occam's Razor rather than giving hint to subtleties the game offers in psychology. Your read on TB has nothing to do with my comment.

Such a simple and straightforward use of logic to judge the game is demonstrative that you have no idea how to figure things out for yourself. This is not a black and white game - there are few if any tells that work every time. This game is about reading motive and not judging opinions as they lay. To neglect the intermingling of use of language and intentions is a grave neglect to the subtlety of this game IMO.

[LicketyQuickety]

That is complete and utter bullshit!

I was wondering when you'd get around to clarifying your previous response to my case.

Do go on, explain how it's bullshit. I'm all ears.

Some people make

apparent

inconsistencies and that has nothing to do with a fabricated read or not. And for the record I am not necessarily questioning the conclusion of your read but the reasoning behind it and you overall general philosophy of the way to get reads. I am challenging you on your reliability to get reads based on Occam's Razor rather than giving hint to subtleties the game offers in psychology. Your read on TB has nothing to do with my comment.

Such a simple and straightforward use of logic to judge the game is demonstrative that you have no idea how to figure things out for yourself. This is not a black and white game - there are few if any tells that work every time. This game is about reading motive and not judging opinions as they lay. To neglect the intermingling of use of language and intentions is a grave neglect to the subtlety of this game IMO.

EBWOP

[Formerfish]

There's this great movie called Equilibrium...

LOL
I get it

I don't know if it is important that I dont understand.

[Gamma Emerald]

What would have made this even better is if realeos replacement fought with Vedith's replacement.

Sorry bruh, not happening. I daycopped Titus and she's inno.

Are you Mason buddies?

[ThinkBig]

There's this great movie called Equilibrium...

LOL
I get it

I don't know if it is important that I dont understand.

It was a game that I played in with PP.

[Gamma Emerald]

There's this great movie called Equilibrium...

LOL
I get it

I don't know if it is important that I dont understand.

Look at PP's egosearch. You'll see it.

[-Grey-]

Nothing in that post compels me to recalibrate my read on ThinkBig.

His convoluted logic doesn't come from a town mindset, it comes from scum trying to sound town.

[LicketyQuickety]

@LQ, waht policy did snarky break?

For anyone that doesn't know me, I Hate policy lynches. I would have a PL against PL's if I could.

Because:

1) he is not active
2) his content is sub-par
3) he never takes risks
4) he has not demonstrated that he can be read.

[LicketyQuickety]

Nothing in that post compels me to recalibrate my read on ThinkBig.

His convoluted logic doesn't come from a town mindset, it comes from scum trying to sound town.

Then why didn't you say THAT in the first place?

[-Grey-]

What would have made this even better is if realeos replacement fought with Vedith's replacement.

Sorry bruh, not happening. I daycopped Titus and she's inno.

Are you Mason buddies?

Sure.

PyP is an open setup that includes Masons as a possibility and that's exactly what Titus and I are after our predecessors spent the whole day at war with each other.

That totally makes sense.

[Vaxkiller]

Sooooo should I not be asking my magic 8 ball who is scum?

I'm just kidding, I try hard, but sometimes I wonder if I would be better off flipping coins.

I'm not feeling the think big wagon. I swear if seen him play in another game pretty similarly... but then again I have to check and see what he flipped!

I'll get back on that tomorrow.

[-Grey-]

Nothing in that post compels me to recalibrate my read on ThinkBig.

His convoluted logic doesn't come from a town mindset, it comes from scum trying to sound town.

Then why didn't you say THAT in the first place?

I did.

[Gamma Emerald]

What would have made this even better is if realeos replacement fought with Vedith's replacement.

Sorry bruh, not happening. I daycopped Titus and she's inno.

Are you Mason buddies?

Sure.

PyP is an open setup that includes Masons as a possibility and that's exactly what Titus and I are after our predecessors spent the whole day at war with each other.

That totally makes sense.

TIL Grey has no sense of humor.

[-Grey-]

What would have made this even better is if realeos replacement fought with Vedith's replacement.

Sorry bruh, not happening. I daycopped Titus and she's inno.

Are you Mason buddies?

Sure.

PyP is an open setup that includes Masons as a possibility and that's exactly what Titus and I are after our predecessors spent the whole day at war with each other.

That totally makes sense.

TIL Grey has no sense of humor.

Til Gamma understands sarcasm.

[Gamma Emerald]

It's true I do have trouble understanding sarcasm.

[Vaxkiller]

@LQ, waht policy did snarky break?

For anyone that doesn't know me, I Hate policy lynches. I would have a PL against PL's if I could.

Because:

1) he is not active
2) his content is sub-par
3) he never takes risks
4) he has not demonstrated that he can be read.

OH! Well that's not a PL, that more of reasons why he could be scummy. That's not a PL in my opinion.

I'm curious.
What do you think of me?

[LicketyQuickety]

@LQ, waht policy did snarky break?

For anyone that doesn't know me, I Hate policy lynches. I would have a PL against PL's if I could.

Because:

1) he is not active
2) his content is sub-par
3) he never takes risks
4) he has not demonstrated that he can be read.

OH! Well that's not a PL, that more of reasons why he could be scummy. That's not a PL in my opinion.

I'm curious.
What do you think of me?

I'm waiting to read you, since you will likely be around for some time. I may or may not be around, I'm not sure at this point.

SS is like that in EVERY game. That is why it is a PL.