Postie feels like she is WKing SS and that makes my scumdar ping something fierce
VOTE: Postie
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:15 am
by Postie
In post 248, RachMarie wrote:It IS possible for a scum double voter and I think I was in ONE game where there was one, but generally double voters are town.
Modding meta does not apply to RC games.
In post 250, RachMarie wrote:Postie feels like she is WKing SS and that makes my scumdar ping something fierce
VOTE: Postie
I get scumread for whiteknighting every single game.
In post 248, RachMarie wrote:It IS possible for a scum double voter and I think I was in ONE game where there was one, but generally double voters are town.
Modding meta does not apply to RC games.
In post 250, RachMarie wrote:Postie feels like she is WKing SS and that makes my scumdar ping something fierce
VOTE: Postie
I get scumread for whiteknighting every single game.
*immediately waits for a wave of scum suicide bombers*
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:17 am
by The DEO
Here's Davsto. You can read the ISO after that point too.
In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
-townpoints for only responding to this part, btw.
Minus townpoints for only responding to the part that explained why you thought I was scum - the answer to the question I asked btw - rather than the bit explaining why RadiantCowbells is town. Riiiiight.
In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
Let's see if that's the case here!
What do you think of my proposed town perspective for his vote on Titus in comparison with your reasoning? Which is more likely?
Cowbells isn't scared of a Titus tunnel on him. He has faced a full-on Titus tunnel before and come out unscathed (and his replacement proceeded to win the game for our scumteam btw).
He only came out unscathed by causing massive amounts of drama, painting my read as just sour grapes and making sure everyone ignored me after I wasn't playing.
Still came out unscathed after a full-on Titus tunnel, point still stands. RadiantCowbells trust in his ability enough to not be scared.
In post 433, Titus wrote:You open by stating a statement you know isn't true (implied Titus is always scum) then buddying while ignoring me.
Man, scumreading me for making jokes. Wish that was the first time I'd seen this.
Again, show the buddying. Also, considering I've replied to at least one of your posts (even if it wasn't regarding your wagon on me) isn't ignoring you. Also, it seems awfully demanding for you to expect me to constantly talk to you even if you're not directly addressing me when there are a good 18 players.
In post 419, Grib wrote:And boasting about being undefeated scum also feels like something town would do, because. They don't care about looking bad for bragging about how great they are at being scum (as that could prompt other people to doubt their townread on them in this game).
RadiantCowbells always brags about their play. It's hardly alignment indicative.
In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
-townpoints for only responding to this part, btw.
Minus townpoints for only responding to the part that explained why you thought I was scum - the answer to the question I asked btw - rather than the bit explaining why RadiantCowbells is town. Riiiiight.
In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
Let's see if that's the case here!
What do you think of my proposed town perspective for his vote on Titus in comparison with your reasoning? Which is more likely?
Cowbells isn't scared of a Titus tunnel on him. He has faced a full-on Titus tunnel before and come out unscathed (and his replacement proceeded to win the game for our scumteam btw).
He only came out unscathed by causing massive amounts of drama, painting my read as just sour grapes and making sure everyone ignored me after I wasn't playing.
Still came out unscathed after a full-on Titus tunnel, point still stands. RadiantCowbells trust in his ability enough to not be scared.
In post 433, Titus wrote:You open by stating a statement you know isn't true (implied Titus is always scum) then buddying while ignoring me.
Man, scumreading me for making jokes. Wish that was the first time I'd seen this.
Again, show the buddying. Also, considering I've replied to at least one of your posts (even if it wasn't regarding your wagon on me) isn't ignoring you. Also, it seems awfully demanding for you to expect me to constantly talk to you even if you're not directly addressing me when there are a good 18 players.
In post 419, Grib wrote:And boasting about being undefeated scum also feels like something town would do, because. They don't care about looking bad for bragging about how great they are at being scum (as that could prompt other people to doubt their townread on them in this game).
RadiantCowbells always brags about their play. It's hardly alignment indicative.
Still don't see it. I mean, I see the thing about the joke, but I don't think it's fair to say that complaining about being scumread for a joke is alignment indicative because one person has done it before as scum.
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:25 am
by Shadow_step
GE ignoring my posts. Classic
Stop playing so many games so you can actually play well somewhere JC
In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
-townpoints for only responding to this part, btw.
Minus townpoints for only responding to the part that explained why you thought I was scum - the answer to the question I asked btw - rather than the bit explaining why RadiantCowbells is town. Riiiiight.
In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
Let's see if that's the case here!
What do you think of my proposed town perspective for his vote on Titus in comparison with your reasoning? Which is more likely?
Cowbells isn't scared of a Titus tunnel on him. He has faced a full-on Titus tunnel before and come out unscathed (and his replacement proceeded to win the game for our scumteam btw).
He only came out unscathed by causing massive amounts of drama, painting my read as just sour grapes and making sure everyone ignored me after I wasn't playing.
Still came out unscathed after a full-on Titus tunnel, point still stands. RadiantCowbells trust in his ability enough to not be scared.
In post 433, Titus wrote:You open by stating a statement you know isn't true (implied Titus is always scum) then buddying while ignoring me.
Man, scumreading me for making jokes. Wish that was the first time I'd seen this.
Again, show the buddying. Also, considering I've replied to at least one of your posts (even if it wasn't regarding your wagon on me) isn't ignoring you. Also, it seems awfully demanding for you to expect me to constantly talk to you even if you're not directly addressing me when there are a good 18 players.
In post 419, Grib wrote:And boasting about being undefeated scum also feels like something town would do, because. They don't care about looking bad for bragging about how great they are at being scum (as that could prompt other people to doubt their townread on them in this game).
RadiantCowbells always brags about their play. It's hardly alignment indicative.
Still don't see it. I mean, I see the thing about the joke, but I don't think it's fair to say that complaining about being scumread for a joke is alignment indicative because one person has done it before as scum.
This particular "joke" when done by three separate people onto me has been scum 3 times and town zero. The behavior and tone matches here.
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:27 am
by Gamma Emerald
Yeah that doesn't really look like WKing
Also I see you but it's not just the PL thing I don't like VOTE: RachMarie
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:27 am
by The DEO
In post 259, Shadow_step wrote:GE ignoring my posts. Classic
Stop playing so many games so you can actually play well somewhere JC
Your posts are spammy garbage.
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:27 am
by KuroiXHF
In post 250, RachMarie wrote:Postie feels like she is WKing SS and that makes my scumdar ping something fierce
VOTE: Postie
This appears like opportunism, which I do not like. VOTE: RachMarie
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:28 am
by The DEO
In post 261, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah that doesn't really look like WKing
Also I see you but it's not just the PL thing I don't like VOTE: RachMarie
In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
-townpoints for only responding to this part, btw.
Minus townpoints for only responding to the part that explained why you thought I was scum - the answer to the question I asked btw - rather than the bit explaining why RadiantCowbells is town. Riiiiight.
In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
Let's see if that's the case here!
What do you think of my proposed town perspective for his vote on Titus in comparison with your reasoning? Which is more likely?
Cowbells isn't scared of a Titus tunnel on him. He has faced a full-on Titus tunnel before and come out unscathed (and his replacement proceeded to win the game for our scumteam btw).
He only came out unscathed by causing massive amounts of drama, painting my read as just sour grapes and making sure everyone ignored me after I wasn't playing.
Still came out unscathed after a full-on Titus tunnel, point still stands. RadiantCowbells trust in his ability enough to not be scared.
In post 433, Titus wrote:You open by stating a statement you know isn't true (implied Titus is always scum) then buddying while ignoring me.
Man, scumreading me for making jokes. Wish that was the first time I'd seen this.
Again, show the buddying. Also, considering I've replied to at least one of your posts (even if it wasn't regarding your wagon on me) isn't ignoring you. Also, it seems awfully demanding for you to expect me to constantly talk to you even if you're not directly addressing me when there are a good 18 players.
In post 419, Grib wrote:And boasting about being undefeated scum also feels like something town would do, because. They don't care about looking bad for bragging about how great they are at being scum (as that could prompt other people to doubt their townread on them in this game).
RadiantCowbells always brags about their play. It's hardly alignment indicative.
Still don't see it. I mean, I see the thing about the joke, but I don't think it's fair to say that complaining about being scumread for a joke is alignment indicative because one person has done it before as scum.
This particular "joke" when done by three separate people onto me has been scum 3 times and town zero. The behavior and tone matches here.
What particular part of I would have voted you of I wanted to PL you, don't you understand?
In post 261, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah that doesn't really look like WKing
Also I see you but it's not just the PL thing I don't like VOTE: RachMarie
Can you do the vote 1: vote 2: thing? Ty.
I can't split votes so I don't bother doing that
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:29 am
by RachMarie
LOL
WKing can happen to scum or town for that matter Deo
My first game on site I was WKed so hard by Metabot that I became unlynchable. And I was the Doc and should have been NKed on N1. Literally he defended me so hard that no one even tried seriously to lynch me and then in 3 player LYLO, I chose him over the one who was town. So yeah I am VERY suspicious of WKing.
SS has 5 votes on him already, I am not as sure on him as I am on Postie.
Though atm sure is relative since it is still very early in the game.
One thing though, I definite feel good about Gamma being town because like I said generally speaking, double voters are generally town, also feel good about dude who claimed hated, because the two balance out fairly well in games.
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:31 am
by Postie
In post 260, The DEO wrote:This particular "joke" when done by three separate people onto me has been scum 3 times and town zero. The behavior and tone matches here.
Eh? Quote/link me the other posts where it happened? And I disagree with behaviour and tone match; there's a subtle difference in that shadow's posts feel "protest-y" whereas Davsto went the more conventional passive-aggressive scum route.
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:35 am
by Postie
In post 267, RachMarie wrote:One thing though, I definite feel good about Gamma being town because like I said generally speaking, double voters are generally town,
In post 260, The DEO wrote:This particular "joke" when done by three separate people onto me has been scum 3 times and town zero. The behavior and tone matches here.
Eh? Quote/link me the other posts where it happened? And I disagree with behaviour and tone match; there's a subtle difference in that shadow's posts feel "protest-y" whereas Davsto went the more conventional passive-aggressive scum route.
Ok.
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:36 am
by Shadow_step
Plus FB was a part of reviewing this setup so expect hell.
