Mafiascum.net

In post 1746, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I've been over this already... today's posts by shannon and LUV are not those of a scumteam. This leaves the possbility that their could be 1 or 0 scum among them. If shannon were scum I'd say gerry is a likely partner but shannon being scum makes LUV town, which makes their claim true. If shannon gerry and rb is the team, and rb gets lynched, do you really see gerry performing the NK when he's the #2 suspect behind rb at end of day? Rhetorical question, the answer is no, shannon would do that kill, but LUV saw her go nowhere. I seriously doubt shannon somehow was a strongman and a ninja in the same night, so I'd say the chances of shannon being the 1 scum here are slim. Assuming LUV is the scum seems like an easy way for scum to push a mislynch off of my suspicions in D1. Nobody seems to be listening to what LUV is saying lately, which makes me think his wagon now is scum-driven. Look at Gerry posting about once a day to do nothing other than remind us to lynch LUV. Titus, if you're truly JOAT now you have a JK shot left, and you were suspicious of the way Gerry was talking about the strongman earlier right? Let's lynch Gerry today and you can jail Drone tonight.

I think Gerry is the 2nd scum and the last is in Titus/Drone

VOTE: Gerryoat

Spoiler: Fast and loose case on Gerry from a skim of his slot's ISO

In post 291, Kohai wrote:Welcome back drone. Excellent analysis.

I'm off to bed. It's almost 3 am.

The above post was made wrt this post:

In post 285, Drone wrote:

In post 240, TTTT wrote:@rb
Plz explain that TR on me.
I mean, other than how your role PM told you that I'm not on your team.

Consistency is town trait
It's not a Newbie game, I think it's obvious and needless to say. But I can agree that it was a bit too early to give that read.

In post 241, TTTT wrote:@Transcend
Why is Imp scum?
I'm going to split posts just so you can enjoy my avatar more...

Because of the 101st point on Impoetic, durr!

In post 247, TTTT wrote:

In post 242, Sesq wrote:What strikes rb as scum to you?

Vote was based on gut upon game entry. Not really buying the cavalier meme-posting attitude on the first pages. Looks forced. Totally gut though.
Naked votes are best votes when entering a game.
Then rb said he couldn't remember why he was SRing ssbm.
Like this never happened

In post 78, rb wrote:

In post 54, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I just made a note "48 - enter rb:gets on the first wagon that is picking up with real intent but attributes his vote to an rvs policy lynch"
His motivation here is either scummy or towny so I'm hoping he's town

No way dude. You mean my motivation could be scummy OR towny? What an enlightening post, it's so good I think I might just

VOTE: ssbm

In post 94, rb wrote:we should have more ssbm votes tbh

sesq is probably town rn

In post 111, rb wrote:you can start by changing your vote to ssbm

In post 116, rb wrote:super saiyan blue majiffy is probably not town tbh

In post 119, rb wrote:

In post 117, Sesq wrote:

In post 116, rb wrote:super saiyan blue majiffy is probably not town tbh

Why do you think that?

post 54 is literally pointless fluff that serves no purpose except, 'look im contributing'

Upon wagon collapse, he gives me a TR.

TTTT goes like “look, I'm town alright? I have reasoning and I'm sure of what I'm doing" in this post. I'm buying it!

In post 248, TTTT wrote:

In post 244, rb wrote:scum look bad if the wagon goes through, ppl lost their minds about it getting to L-2. i'd be mislynch but everyone on the wagon would be under suspicion - you don't really seem to give a shit because ur not worried about it, so ur town enough for now

But that means you didn't consider I'm a good enough scum player to not freak out about L-2.

Then he just shits on it with "fuck it, no I'm scum".

And that's why TTTT is scum guys!

It bothered me back then, and when I asked Kohai if that was sarcasm he didn't reply to me.

In post 454, Kohai wrote:

In post 438, ironstove wrote:Fuck you spammers I don't want to read this garbage Lynch drone he's spamming this thread up why the fuck is there 18 pages?!?!

This guy is writing fucking nonsense and transcend is handing out town reads like hot cakes. He prob town reads Hitler too

VOTE: drone

I do not like this post at all.

Ironstove is now a strong scumread.

Flaming is rude as heck but not a scum trait imo. Leaves me thinking the flaming is an excuse to chainsaw ironstove to get pressure off Drone.

In post 548, Kohai wrote:My top town reads right now are rabbit and drone.

Conveniently the 2 players I think this slot is most likely to be scum with.

Enter Gerry

In post 887, gerryoat wrote:This is my first scumread

VOTE: Drone

Distancing? Maybe? Not like anyone can call him out on this since he's just replaced in, so it's fine for his slot's reads to change.

In post 1090, gerryoat wrote:Yo, I think transcend is town. And if his claim is legit then i think rb is maf from a setup standpoint. but hmmmm. question is, would rb REALLY claim BP as maf? that's like the most scummy PR claim. Is it too scummy to be scum? Or is it wifom that we would all think it's too scummy to be scum and unvote it. anyway, i think i'm gonna vote this for now

VOTE: rb

If anyone on the rb wagon was scum it's this^

In post 1499, gerryoat wrote:

In post 1153, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:No one wants to lynch D7/Impoetic so I'm forced to compromise.

why did you not track one of your 2 scumreads?You scumread them so much that you felt that you'd have to 'compromise' to vote someone else. @Lil Uzi Vert

This question doesn't take into consideration that LUV was expecting rb to flip town. Those scumreads of his were based on a very old conversation early in D1. d7's vocal pushing of rb probably was reinforcing that read up until the flip, where LUVs perspective was shattered. I'm guessing he looked at my posts pointing toward the associations between LUV, rb, and shannon, and tracked shannon because rb flipped scum and he knows he's town if he's really the tracker.

In post 1750, Titus wrote:I do not mind jailing Drone, but Gerry is town. If Gerry was scum, I would have been attacked while I investigated Gerry. No, I was attacked while I FoSed Drone.

So, if we do not lynch Drone and I check him, then I need to lynch his partner which is Shannon or LUV.

In post 1802, gerryoat wrote:Hey guys, can we think logically? Why isn't it possible for there be a

1 shot

tracker in a game with a JOAT?

Why would Gerry continue to push such a nonsensical case?

In post 1805, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:

In post 1802, gerryoat wrote:Hey guys, can we think logically? Why isn't it possible for there be a

1 shot

tracker in a game with a JOAT?

Why would Gerry continue to push such a nonsensical case?

In post 1810, TTTT wrote:@Titus
I'll take another look at drone
Tell me where to look

In post 1809, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Fine I'll spill, I'm actually a 2-shot follower. Didn't want to give it away but you guys won't leave things alone.

In post 1721, TTTT wrote:

In post 1709, Drone wrote:What makes me doubt Titus is a backup is the fact that there is no neighbourizer. But I'm not taking the risk. We have a JOAT.

Why do you doubt that neighbor could be a modifier added to a universal backup?

@mod

-- Hypothetical question that you may not be able to answer: Are modifiers (if they exist) applied randomly (like roles) or would they be mod-assigned to specific roles as part of the setup?

In post 1813, Titus wrote:

In post 1809, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Fine I'll spill, I'm actually a 2-shot follower. Didn't want to give it away but you guys won't leave things alone.

Why the claim tracker originally?

In post 1815, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:

In post 1813, Titus wrote:

In post 1809, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Fine I'll spill, I'm actually a 2-shot follower. Didn't want to give it away but you guys won't leave things alone.

Why the claim tracker originally?

So scum would think I'm useless and alllow me to use my last shot to potentially find one Night 2.

In post 1817, TTTT wrote:Then why didn't you claim 1-shot follower?

In post 1819, TTTT wrote:But if scum why not claim 2-shot tracker now?
I don't get it either way.

In post 1817, TTTT wrote:Then why didn't you claim 1-shot follower?

In post 1820, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:No reason. Tracker, Voyeur, and Motion Dectetor all are under the same umbrella so I just picked one and went with it.

In post 1821, Titus wrote:

In post 1819, TTTT wrote:But if scum why not claim 2-shot tracker now?
I don't get it either way.

Well, look at what was proposed. Namely, I jailkeep Drone. Now that he's a "follower" he can claim what action I took instead of I visited Drone. It's a rather convinent change to make himself more valuable.