Mafiascum.net

In post 1623, shannon wrote:Gerry if you think this is the case, you ought to make a case on LUV now.

already did

In post 1474, gerryoat wrote:if someone else is an investigation role, I say we lynch LUV cause I don't see 2 inv roles for town this game.

In post 1484, gerryoat wrote:Calling BS on having a 1 shot Tracker when we already have a Joat. Also you didn't need to even claim, you only claimed so a lynch wouldnt form on you after he flipped scum.

VOTE: Lil Uzi Vert

This? Or was there more?

Not a case. Ignore him.

In post 1627, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Not a case. Ignore him.

this looks really scummy/dismissive tbh

almost ready to vote you

LUV is my 2ndary choice to titus and will go there still but I'm much more confident in the titus flip being red and it sorting the buddies from there

In post 1624, drealmerz7 wrote:agree gerry but titus first to sort the shit because I'm leaning shannon town LUV scum atm but not sure

drone saying to hammer without that claim is fucked though, but let's not let it distract

we're on course

What is so fucked about it?
I told you, there's only one possible claim Titus can make.
Anything else would just clarify she's scum.

that's for her to say is what is fucked

In post 1628, Sesq wrote:

In post 1627, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Not a case. Ignore him.

this looks really scummy/dismissive tbh

almost ready to vote you

It isn't. His case is basically I don't believe it's possible for a mini Normal to have two investigative roles and I only claimed because I didn't want to her lynched. The first point is false since you can ask any mod or look at past games to verify that such a setup is possible and the second is just dumb. Of course I don't want to get lynched. Who does?

she wasn't in danger of being lynched...

I am the universal backup. The mod did tell me the bulletproof was used. My role isn't inconsistent with a one shot tracker, just makes it highly improbable. I wanted to punt on setup spec until I could find a way to do it without outing my role. That's also why I had to sort Gerry and his knowledge.

Scum managed to rolefish me though. They wouldn't pile on though if Drone wasn't scum though.

So Drone/Uzi/one more.

Probably not Drealmerz as he is scapegoat.

gerry or shannon if you are truthful and right

no it could be more than that actually

No Gerry.

Neighbour universal backup?
K.

Also, I want your answer Titus.

In post 1634, Titus wrote:I am the universal backup. The mod did tell me the bulletproof was used. My role isn't inconsistent with a one shot tracker, just makes it highly improbable. I wanted to punt on setup spec until I could find a way to do it without outing my role. That's also why I had to sort Gerry and his knowledge.

Scum managed to rolefish me though. They wouldn't pile on though if Drone wasn't scum though.

So Drone/Uzi/one more.

Are you countering Drone's Neighbor claim here?
it isn't real clear.
And why aren't you voting LUV if it's highly improbable your roles are compatible?
and what does this have to do with sorting Gerry?

VC 2.08

Titus (5)

: ssbm_Kyouko, drealmerz7, Lil Uzi Vert, shannon, Drone

-- L-1!

Lil Uzi Vert (2)

: gerryoat, TTTT

NOT VOTING (4)

: Impoetic, Titus, ironstove, Sesq

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2016-12-22 01:30:00)

Okay i'm sorry can someone tell me why one of the potential lynches is a PR claim? also wow, titus replaced fluffyrabbit. I was honestly townreading rabbit but at the same time felt like i was being buddied and id k

i need to catch up but the more i think about that hte less i want to play this so i'm gonna try to just do that in bits and keep up with later posts

Oh wait apparently both are PR claims

I was referring to lil uzi who claimed tracker early on

In post 1640, TTTT wrote:

In post 1634, Titus wrote:I am the universal backup. The mod did tell me the bulletproof was used. My role isn't inconsistent with a one shot tracker, just makes it highly improbable. I wanted to punt on setup spec until I could find a way to do it without outing my role. That's also why I had to sort Gerry and his knowledge.

Scum managed to rolefish me though. They wouldn't pile on though if Drone wasn't scum though.

So Drone/Uzi/one more.

Are you countering Drone's Neighbor claim here?
it isn't real clear.
And why aren't you voting LUV if it's highly improbable your roles are compatible?
and what does this have to do with sorting Gerry?

No. I am Drone's Neighbor but intended to play that close to the vest.

Again, you misinterpret (I hope). Our roles are inconsistent, but not unlikely. I never got attacked until I fingered Drone, so Drone is more likely scum.

Gerry claimed the bulletproof was used. I wanted to see whether he believed a strongman existed due to play or knew a strongman was in play because he was scum.

**unlikely but not inconsistent

I still don't get why Scum Uzi fakes a clear result on me of all people, though?

This game is doing my head in.

okay pretty sure it is titus+LUV as scum

just did a shitload of reread

before titus replaces fluffy the wagon on rb is pretty strong and fluffy is no where to be seen - drone is arguing for ppl to get off the rb wagon quite a bit, but I still don't scumread it - who knows what happens with fluffy, but he's gone while that rb wagon grows heat - titus comes in and is just stern against the rb wagon without much reason and no good reason

ugh, it sucks cause both drone and titus really are against the rb wagon

but I feel titus+uzi as rb scummates, not drone + whomever (not LUV and drone though)

chance titus+drone are mates too

titus is the lynch

In post 1632, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:

In post 1628, Sesq wrote:

In post 1627, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Not a case. Ignore him.

this looks really scummy/dismissive tbh

almost ready to vote you

It isn't. His case is basically I don't believe it's possible for a mini Normal to have two investigative roles

and I only claimed because I didn't want to her lynched.

The first point is false since you can ask any mod or look at past games to verify that such a setup is possible and the

second is just dumb. Of course I don't want to get lynched.

Who does?

Just read this again...

Your answer is a bit of a non-sequitur. The accusation you quote is that you only claimed because you didn't want *her* (me) lynched. You counter that by calling it dumb, because 'of course I (you) don't want to get lynched'.

I think you've revealed your true purpose in the claim here, and it wasn't to give info on me, it was to save your own ass.

Anyone else see this or am I reading it wrong?