Mini Normal 1857 (Game Over - Mafia Wins!)

Sesq · Post Post #1550 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 6:38 pm

In post 1540, Titus wrote:
In post 1536, drealmerz7 wrote:you!

I was saying I think the sesq comment was about you doing the diligence to check on activity
I have been here daily, so why would due diligence be checking my activity levels?

It was about checking iron's activity, not yours.

Titus · Post Post #1551 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 6:55 pm

Sesq, why do you think there was no counter to rb?

Sesq · Post Post #1552 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:03 pm

In post 1551, Titus wrote:Sesq, why do you think there was no counter to rb?

There was. They weren't as successful because the counterwagon did not look as scum as rb (WE WERE RIGHT)

Titus · Post Post #1553 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:05 pm

1 or 2 votes is not a counterwagon.

Sesq · Post Post #1554 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:17 pm

In post 1553, Titus wrote:1 or 2 votes is not a counterwagon.

I didn't mean strong counterwagon, but OK. I suspect bussing (ironstove was, LUV wasn't)

Titus · Post Post #1555 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:42 pm

Why bussing?

Sesq · Post Post #1556 (ISO) » Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:54 pm

In post 1555, Titus wrote:Why bussing?

Titus wrote:1 or 2 votes is not a counterwagon.

shannon · Post Post #1557 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 2:39 am

I have been looking at the wagons and going round and round in circles.

I feel like there's something going on with

Ironstove

. He's voting Gerry for the longest time (from vote count in 910 to vote count in 1321, then votes on RB *where Gerry is voting*. This screams 'late attempt at bussing'.

I am also wondering why

Impoetic

has never been shown as voting, in any of the vote counts. Care to explain that one please? I can see a vote on RB on 156 (called a joke), and a skim reveals no other votes.

On the plus side,

D7

looks town for his actions around the RB wagon.

VOTE: Impoetic

Drone · Post Post #1558 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 5:09 am

Catching up, I'm sick so please bear with me. The worst is behind me

Drone · Post Post #1559 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 5:39 am

In post 1450, Titus wrote:
In post 1426, gerryoat wrote:Why do you want drone?
Because he took no real major stance on Rb and coasted through the time.

Yes, Titus.
Why were you lying?

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1560 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 6:22 am

oh hey thanks for pointing that back out to me

In post 1450, Titus wrote: Because he took no real major stance on Rb and coasted through the time.

and your stance was so real! - "he's town, because..." still waiting to hear why you thought he was town

vote titus ppl!

ssbm_Kyouko · Post Post #1561 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 7:04 am

VOTE: Titus

Titus · Post Post #1562 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 7:15 am

In post 1560, drealmerz7 wrote:oh hey thanks for pointing that back out to me

In post 1450, Titus wrote: Because he took no real major stance on Rb and coasted through the time.
and your stance was so real! - "he's town, because..." still waiting to hear why you thought he was town

vote titus ppl!

Like I said, there was no counter. I want to solve why now.

Titus · Post Post #1563 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 7:16 am

In post 1559, Drone wrote:
In post 1450, Titus wrote:
In post 1426, gerryoat wrote:Why do you want drone?
Because he took no real major stance on Rb and coasted through the time.
Yes, Titus.
Why were you lying?

Why are you dodging that you've been a lurksack since my arrival and just throwing shade implying I lied somewhere?

ssbm_Kyouko · Post Post #1564 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 7:31 am

Quick iso of drone shows he had a real stance on rb though, he thought rb was town and was trying to convince Transcend to unvote him.

Titus · Post Post #1565 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 7:35 am

Drone said nothing since I subbed in. So he took no stance. I don't ISO for ancient history. He avoided the thread entirely during the wagon.

TTTT · Post Post #1566 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 7:45 am

V/LA through the weekend.

ssbm_Kyouko · Post Post #1567 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 8:10 am

Did you not read the thread when you subbed in? He gave his stance on the wagon only a few pages before you subbed. He didn't abandon the thread during the wagon but at that point he wanted to let a vig shoot rb to prove if his claim was real or not, and in the meantime was thinking it was d7 who was scum for getting so aggressive onto rb after the wagon gained traction

gerryoat · Post Post #1568 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:45 pm

daily reminder to vote LUV

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1569 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 1:01 pm

In post 1562, Titus wrote: Like I said, there was no counter. I want to solve why now.

you read HIM as town because there was no counterwagon?

you mean they'd try to make a counterwagon to save their buddy and because they didn't you read him town - that doesn't really compute as a reason to townread someone, it computes as you knowing his alignment and positioning yourself in a way to give him a townread, but, ignoring that for now, wouldn't that be a little obvious that that is what happened at that point?

regardless of if the counterwagon reached lynch or the rb wagon? counterwagon gets lynched and flips town and those who start it / help it gain momentum risk outting themselves as scum if rb gets killed in the future or even if not just for pushing a town wagon to lynch (sure they can just hope to be read as "oops" but...not a good risk at that point in the game) - or counterwagon fails, rb is lynched, flips scum and those seen opposing his lynch and starting a counter too much are outed as scum (oh hi titus!)

Titus · Post Post #1570 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 1:26 pm

In post 1567, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Did you not read the thread when you subbed in? He gave his stance on the wagon only a few pages before you subbed. He didn't abandon the thread during the wagon but at that point he wanted to let a vig shoot rb to prove if his claim was real or not, and in the meantime was thinking it was d7 who was scum for getting so aggressive onto rb after the wagon gained traction

I never read the thread on sub in. I might do ISOs but for the most part, no.

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1571 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 1:27 pm

WHAT?!

why not?

you need to read the thread to know wtf is going on

Titus · Post Post #1572 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 1:28 pm

Drone wanted a vig shot to test rb's claim...that just gives scum an ability to make rb look town.

@Drealmerz, Nice word salad. Want to slow down, gather your thoughts and try again?

Titus · Post Post #1573 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 1:28 pm

In post 1571, drealmerz7 wrote:WHAT?!

why not?

you need to read the thread to know wtf is going on

VCs tell me that. Words are charisma. VCs are hard data.

drealmerz7 · Post Post #1574 (ISO) » Sat Dec 10, 2016 1:44 pm

In post 1572, Titus wrote:Drone wanted a vig shot to test rb's claim...that just gives scum an ability to make rb look town.

@Drealmerz, Nice word salad. Want to slow down, gather your thoughts and try again?

no, nice try to evade

VOTE: vote titus, ppls