Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 7:03 am
You aren't voting fitz/hiraki so you have no interest in lynching scum.In post 697, MathBlade wrote:Suspect all you want. I have scum to lynch. You will be proven wrong very soon I think.
You aren't voting fitz/hiraki so you have no interest in lynching scum.In post 697, MathBlade wrote:Suspect all you want. I have scum to lynch. You will be proven wrong very soon I think.
In post 349, havingfitz wrote:I started the post below yesterday and then my slow day became not so slow...
//Slow day. I notice I only have 3 posts....sorry about that. I do
tend to be a bit of an underposter that catches up in longer type
posts. Being primarily a phone poster slows me down a bit too. But I
digress...
So catching up from post 177 to 262...
I still am of the opinion TVD and Hiraki are town. TVD hasn't done
anything to change my previous view on him because he hasn't done
anything (literally) since my last catch up post. Whereas Hiraki has
zeroed in on LUV...who I also have suspicions
towards. I also still do not like the Io slot because of my
aforementioned reasons and now because they have flaked out of the
game. My vote is teetering between LUV and Io but I'll keep it where
it's at for now until Io's replacement changes my mind or a better
spot for it presents itself.//
So to resume....
My vote on Io wasn't based on the firmest of indictments and I've
liked what I've seen from Deer so far so I removed my vote. I believe
the mason claims. LUV was on the verge of getting lynched and his
claim made sense. Outing both masons wasn't necessarily a good idea
unless absolutely required but at least it will help with POE as long
as they both are alive. I do not think scum would fakeclaim mason and
risk outing two players as they could be subject to potential
investigative PRs who doubt their claim. I can't recall exactly why
but I also had niggling suspicions towards Misa. So their claims has
helped divert my radar elsewhere as I probably would have wound up on
the LUV wagon as well once my suspicions on the Io slot had been
reduced.
So where am I now?
Town (masons) - LUV, Misa
~Town - Hiraki, TVD
Ari: Softcrumb (~bad). Vote on me (despite essentially
agreeing with my reasons for voting Io after
condemning me for my Io vote) (bad). Votes a ~mason (~bad). Lobbies
against voting Eric (ffr). =weak suspicion
Creeps: Not a lot of posts (bad). Early push for scum hunting
(good). Early Eric vote was valid (based on Eric's bad Post
140 (ffr). Some impressive irony. = weak
town lean
TwiszTed: Very active (good). Defends Ari softclaim against
TVD (ffr). Town post (good).
Questions Eric's mason vote (good). Debates his Eric
vote to TwoFace (ffr). Gets pissed at TwoFace
misrep. (ffr). Surrenders to Eric ~newbie-ness and
unvotes (ffr). Banned (bad...on him). Lean town.
TwoFace: Very active(good). Early stat theory fluff (~bad).
Shades mason (bad). Misreps (bad) Ted and gets into tiff. Naked
Misa/mason vote (bad). Defensive of Eric (ffr). Says vote on Misa is
gut (Post 262) despite having just given
several reasons for voting her (bad).
Reiterates vote on Misa doesn't have a lot of merit.
General snarkiness. =Scum lean.
Gamma Emerald: Very active (good). Early theory and alt fluff
(bad). Questions TVD's confidence (?). Seems to be shading TVD a bit
(ffr). Emphatically tells Eric not to claim. Votes
mason (bad). Emphatically tells Luv to out his
partner. Question for Gamma.....have you ever played in a game
were a mason claimed and did not immediately reveal his partner's
identity thereby proving they were fake-claiming scum? If scum are
going to fakeclaim why involve a partner? They could just fake claim
a PR that they might hate to see in the game in hopes of getting away
with it or outing said disliked PR. Poor excuse for
encouraging mason partner outing. (bad). Lack or
partner wasn't important yet and you literally screamed for
LUV's partner 1 minute after he claimed. =Scum
lean.
Io/Deer: Not a lot of posting yet. I disliked Io's stats chat
to start the game but I've liked what Deer has brought to the game so
far. Town lean for me atm.
Frankjaeger: Not enough to go on yet. = Null
Eric: Bit of a late entry in the game with an immediate mason
vote for gut minus any evidence (bad). Proceeds to gives reasons
for LUV vote and voices suspicion of Gamma and Ted (ffr). A few posts
related to how things are or aren't done on this site compared to his
experience (meh). Post 140 is just a bad post for
reasons I have previously explained. As yet unexplained Ted vote
(ffr). Has lots of mafia experience....is aware others find him
suspect but doesn't nothing to correct aside from proclaiming himself
town (bad). =Scum lean.
As experienced scum that has won a majority of games here list reads require a shit ton more finesse as scum than town. It exposes a lot of the mindset. Even in Gistou when I was widely townread it was a huge risk.In post 703, TwoFace wrote:Fitz from what I remember does that kind of thing as both alignments though.
List reads are easy to do as scum. Easier when you have a claimed pr.
Not as genuine? If I recall Hiraki was the first person to go out on a limb proclaiming Eric was a VI (and ergo not voteworthy). Not something I would have done in the presence of suspect posting by Eric. And certainly no reason for scum to. How was Hiraki's attitude about Eric off?In post 645, Joshz wrote:the reason he(TF)gets more cred for it is that hiraki's didn't feel as genuine, whereas i liked tf's attitude about it.
1) Since you keep referencing your experience with me who are you?In post 703, TwoFace wrote:Fitz from what I remember does that kind of thing as both alignments though.
List reads are easy to do as scum. Easier when you have a claimed pr.
So you can continually make references to your experience with me to support your comments (albeit poorly) but I shouldn't have the same luxury?In post 710, TwoFace wrote:Who I am doesn't matter.
Far as I am concerned I don't give two shits about prior experience unless you are using it to make a point about strategy or to claim that a certain action is right.In post 711, havingfitz wrote:So you can continually make references to your experience with me to support your comments (albeit poorly) but I shouldn't have the same luxury?In post 710, TwoFace wrote:Who I am doesn't matter.
E changing eirs avatar is new. What prompted it?In post 702, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think Math is town currently. His desire to find an early scumteam looks like Watch Dogs Blitz.
There's a thread where you can request profile edits.In post 714, MathBlade wrote:E changing eirs avatar is new. What prompted it?In post 702, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think Math is town currently. His desire to find an early scumteam looks like Watch Dogs Blitz.
I typically don't either. I was just curious because TF has made several points based on his experience with me. Even if he was a known alt for someone I knew/recalled it probably wouldn't effect my view of him in this game.In post 713, MathBlade wrote:Far as I am concerned I don't give two shits about prior experience
Fuck that. Stop fishing. I wish I had a gun right now.In post 720, Gamma Emerald wrote:Creeps I'd prefer if you claimed now since we're having trouble assembling votes rn.
I legit do not care what you think. This town is like a chicken with it's head cut off so claiming now, instead of when/if he reaches L-1, is more optimal so town has more time to switch if he's a PR.In post 721, MathBlade wrote:Fuck that. Stop fishing. I wish I had a gun right now.In post 720, Gamma Emerald wrote:Creeps I'd prefer if you claimed now since we're having trouble assembling votes rn.