Mafiascum.net

Creeps Iso was lackluster ngl

Later today I plan on reading scum iso and then chillin like a villain

any questions hmu

In post 1599, TwoFace wrote:

In post 1590, Hiraki wrote:That is not what I said, I even quoted the post in the previous page when talking to Nacho. You can't just stuff words in my mouth, I know what I said. Here it is, yet again:

Well that makes me even more suspicious of you given fitz was scum. Creeps was a bad vote. Nobody had good reasons for him, not even you imo.

Which is fine - I would rather you have a worse opinion on me but be correct on the situation or at least understand where I'm coming from. It's not so much that I mind disagreeing opinions - I disagreed with a lot of people this game. It's when the opinion has false circumstances is when I get particularly annoyed.

I think I understand what Nacho is getting at with the Ari read but I can't say anymore since it's ongoing.

My vote is still good.

In post 1603, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:but I can't say anymore since it's ongoing.

then why bring it up?

i don't get why people bring up stuff they aren't allowed to talk about

It might end very soon so I might be able too.

Hiraki (4): Joshz, Lil Uzi Vert, FrankJaeger, Gamma Emerald
xSoniaNevermindx (2): Vedith, Aristophanes
Aj The Epic (1): Nachomamma8
Gamma Emerald (1): Hiraki
FrankJaeger (1): xSoniaNevermindx

No Vote (2): Aj The Epic, TwoFace

With 11 players living, 6 votes are required to lynch.


(expired on 2016-12-20 16:30:00)


Gamma Emerald V/LA until 16 December (normal activity/prod requirements will apply)
Vedith V/LA until 18 December

bumpadadump

In post 1607, Dierfire wrote:

Once again, players are strongly cautioned against discussion of ongoing games.

Aren't we all

Aristo, Hiraki, mind voting AJ with me? As far as catchups go, that one was particularly pitiful.

In post 1585, Aristophanes wrote:Wow, I came off as an ass there. Sorry man!

But really, I don't see a good reason to vote Hiraki.
Why is that a good wagon again?
Can we shift it somewhere else or is it basically decided for the day already?

We can shift it. I think that we should shift it onto AJ.

In post 1573, Aj The Epic wrote:Walk me through the logic of how him believing new players don't get scum when he claims to have played for 7 years. I think I get what you're going for (he's new, thought new can't get scum, ergo isn't scum) but I'm not really seeing it, especially when he claims to have a lot of experience.

He thought that site newbies couldn't get scum, which is fairly common as far as "other site metas" go. 7 years of experience also doesn't mean a ton of games which is something you should know by now; you should also be able to tell that he's probably a newbie by his play style regardless of what he states in thread.

In post 1556, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hiraki - opted to not vote fitz after stating he would

This isn't really accurate; he said that he could vote fitz but kept his vote on his primary scumread.

Forgot about this tbh

and I feel really lazy...yay procrastination

If you vote AJ you can procrastinate as long as you like

In post 1612, Nachomamma8 wrote:

In post 1573, Aj The Epic wrote:Walk me through the logic of how him believing new players don't get scum when he claims to have played for 7 years. I think I get what you're going for (he's new, thought new can't get scum, ergo isn't scum) but I'm not really seeing it, especially when he claims to have a lot of experience.

He thought that site newbies couldn't get scum, which is fairly common as far as "other site metas" go. 7 years of experience also doesn't mean a ton of games which is something you should know by now; you should also be able to tell that he's probably a newbie by his play style regardless of what he states in thread.

This is wrong. feels like a stretch I think 7 years hell I'd assume a lot of games aswell it's not black and white and not being able to tell he's a noob are you srs?
idk what you're reaching for but I don't like it

VOTE: Nacho

In post 1615, Nachomamma8 wrote:If you vote AJ you can procrastinate as long as you like

tempting

When you're an experienced player you can generally tell when someone knows what they're doing and when someone doesn't.

Nacho is a near-confirmed mason.

And 7 years and some sites is much different than 7 years on others (and playing lots of games doesn't always translate to skill).

If you've played basketball before, you can tell how much they've played simply by watching them; if they've spent 7 years playing and still can't lay up the ball properly, they're a newbie.

In post 1619, Hiraki wrote:Nacho is a near-confirmed mason.

.
.
.


I may have forgot about this

UNVOTE:

In post 1562, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:kk just read Eric w/e slot that is seems town to me he's adorable "can we role claim?" "what is d1" awwww <3

And, I'm sorry, but when you read these Eric posts did you assume that he played a ton of games?

In post 1610, Nachomamma8 wrote:Aristo, Hiraki, mind voting AJ with me? As far as catchups go, that one was particularly pitiful.

the one he didn't make yet?

i can't atm tbh

In post 1619, Hiraki wrote:Nacho is a near-confirmed mason.

We have three days left. How much longer are you going to sit on your vote?