Mini #534 - Vegetable Mafia (Game Over!)

[Y]

Assuming that this game has three mafias, like most mini games, I'm guessing there were two on the waggon and one off.

Scum don't want to be the ones to hammer a wagon, just to get it close enough for some one else to do do it.
There's usually one off the wagon, in order to claim innocent in case it goes wrong.

If ryan is scum, then they're probably on the waggon to clear themselves.

[Oman]

Your above post...it just sucks.

I mean, its okay speculation, but it doesn't give a few things: 1. who is/isn't scum on the wagon in your opinion. 2. is ryan town or scum. Both of which are ratehr imporatant in my eyes.

[destructor]

You know what else is important? soupfly telling me why he voted for me.

[Phate]

Unvote, Vote: destructor

Too many votes, too fast. Why would you add another?

[ryan]

ryan, out of the people that stacked on you, who appears most scummy to you and why?

Destructor and Oman both strike me as scummy and wouldn't shock me if they were a scumpair.

[Phate]

I understand why you think destructor is scummy.

I understand why you think Oman is scummy, although I disagree.

What makes you think they're a scumpair?

[ryan]

Their play so far is just so far out there it makes me feel like they are doing it both on purpose to throw off the rest of the town

[Phate]

No, you misunderstand. I know you find them scummy. I'm asking if you see anything that suggests a link between them.

[ryan]

No, you misunderstand. I know you find them scummy. I'm asking if you see anything that suggests a link between them.

I believe their votes on me were FAR from random. They both have been playing so strangely that I feel as though it was talked about before we started (in their pregame chat) While I'm at it.........

Unvote

Either is going to be getting my vote but not just yet.

[Phate]

Why are you holding off on the vote? What are you waiting for?

[ryan]

Why are you holding off on the vote? What are you waiting for?

I'd like to find their partner (or partners) first. I also want to see voting trends and hear from more of our players before I throw a vote out there out of the random stage.

[destructor]

Unvote, Vote: destructor

Too many votes, too fast. Why would you add another?

Does you read thread?

[Phate]

I can has explanation?

[Phate]

You voted. The mod counted it, even though it wasn't in the proper syntax. I count that as a vote. If you were trying to lay a trap, explain. If not, then you intended to vote, you posted a vote, and the mod counted it. That's a vote.

[destructor]

Eh?
That was a mod error. I already explain my post.

[Phate]

You voted. The mod counted it, even though it wasn't in the proper syntax. I count that as a vote. If you were trying to lay a trap, explain. If not, then you intended to vote, you posted a vote, and the mod counted it. That's a vote.

[destructor]

So you're suggesting that I anticipated that the mod would ignore the rules for me, or something to that effect?

[ryan]

So you're suggesting that I anticipated that the mod would ignore the rules for me, or something to that effect?

Why is that so impossible to believe?

[WhoMe?]

Eh?
That was a mod error. I already explain my post.

vote destructor

was that what you were going to use? I wasn't on the mislynch, it was a mod error!

[Phate]

I'm not suggesting anything. I'm asking you: did you intend to vote or not? If so, why? If not, what was the point?

[ryan]

Vote: destructor

I think this last exchange shows us scum. Time to hang scum man

[Northjayhawk]

I count 5 on destructor. I am not yet comfortable with seeing this get pushed to the brink without giving it another chance to see an actual response to Phate's question.

FoS: destructor

113 seemed clear enough to me: regardless of the mod error, did you intend to vote, or did you intend to set some kind of trap by casting a vote that wouldnt count.

Misunderstanding once might be fine, but in 116, its reading like your dancing around the question and reading something into it that was obviously not intended.

[kravhen]

Woah woah woah, let him explain himself people.
People are going crazy with the votes now. Short day 1 is BAD FOR TOWN.

Unvote

in case i somehow got a vote on him, i lose track. Anyway, I just want him to explain, I don't find it scummy to anticipate the mod to not count a vote because of bad synthax, therefore putting down a "ghost vote" to try to lure a hammer or analyse reactions while keeping the votee NOT actually at L-1 or something. Something like that can even seem clever and useful to some extent, perhaps. Clever use of modding rules. Anyway. Explanation first, lynching later.

[Phate]

Wow, way to give your buddy an out, huh, kravhen?

[kravhen]

Wow, way to give your buddy an out, huh, kravhen?

I guess I should've known some mindless idiot would come up and say something obvious and predictable like that?

Defending someone and trying to stop the day from ending on page 6 does NOT equal scummy.

But since you seem awfully sure he is scum, show us all your full case on him that makes him "obviously scum" therefore lynch-worthy. After all, I have trouble believing someone would have enough information by page 6 about anyone, let alone EVERYONE, to seal the deal on page 6.

Go. I'm waiting.