Page 36 of 107
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:34 am
by Thor665
In post 869, karnos wrote: In post 866, Thor665 wrote:
You suggest your logic is good, and then present a case against people who make walls, which has nothing to do with logic, and using the evidence of 'they were wrong' to attack a situation that may or may not have been based off logic.
I feel your answer here supports my stance.
Huh? A case? I'm not presenting a case, I'm presenting EVIDENCE. Logic works. Making fake logic visible to everybody and using it to look towny... well that make "work" if your goal is to look towny, but it doesn't catch scum any more often than my logic does.
Look at any of my scum games, read the scum chat. We destroy people who post read lists and explain all their logic, because they are basically telling the scum team exactly what to do to win.
It's not logical to reveal your logic in game. So I don't see how you can say I'm not a logical player.
I'll stand by my commentary as stated.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:40 am
by kraska77
compare jar and elyse's approaches to maria
elyse's posts at maria seem exploitative
feels like she's more concerned with looking town for the push rather than genuinely sorting her
her posts are mostly "u did blabla and yadayada and according to wikitells that makes u scum"
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:42 am
by Transcend
kinda want everyone to make reads lists but you don't have to if you don't want to. i just wanna see overall where everyone's heads are at...
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:44 am
by Thor665
I would lynch Kraska, Maria, or Elyse. I would happily help policy Shadow.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:48 am
by Elyse
In post 874, kraska77 wrote:hoookay
maria is town because...i think she's perfectly capable of consistent play. especially with jarjar constantly pointing out inconsistencies in her posts, i think she would have tweaked her play if she were scum. that she didnt and continues to be erratic, makes me think town. can u guys please not reduce my read on her to just "meta"?
I think at this point she's too deep and has to keep the histrionics up
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:49 am
by Elyse
In post 876, kraska77 wrote:compare jar and elyse's approaches to maria
elyse's posts at maria seem exploitative
feels like she's more concerned with looking town for the push rather than genuinely sorting her
her posts are mostly "u did blabla and yadayada and according to wikitells that makes u scum"
What the fuck?
Where did I use wiki tells at all?
You're just bullshitting
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:51 am
by kraska77
lol
you used stereotypical scumtells against her is what i mean
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:51 am
by kraska77
anyway shadow what do you think of maria
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:51 am
by Elyse
In post 878, Thor665 wrote:I would lynch Kraska, Maria, or Elyse. I would happily help policy Shadow.
Why not transcend
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:52 am
by Elyse
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:54 am
by JarJarDrinks
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:54 am
by Transcend
In post 878, Thor665 wrote:I would lynch Kraska, Maria, or Elyse. I would happily help policy Shadow.
VOTE: shadow_step
not really a policy lynch on my behalf but i think this needs to be wagoned due to forced posts.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:58 am
by Transcend
i really hate insufferable cunts like you that deathtunnel me JJD.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 2:58 am
by kraska77
i cant be bothered to iso you now
but off the top of my head you used her getting flustered under pressure against her for one
and stop evading my point...your push on her felt opportunistic
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:04 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 869, karnos wrote:It's not logical to reveal your logic in game. So I don't see how you can say I'm not a logical player.
Isn't this the answer Trump just gave about how to defeat ISIS?
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:04 am
by JarJarDrinks
What would u call what ur doing to Michel?
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:08 am
by kraska77
town: nero, jar, maria,\
lean town: iai, gerryoat, michel
dunno: transcend, thor, karnos, shadow
scum: blitz, elyse,
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:08 am
by kraska77
hmm actually shadow is somewhere between dunno and lean town
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:13 am
by Thor665
Because I don't particularly scumread him and don't see a valid case being pushed on him.
The most "valid" case I see is Michael's attempts, and I think I was fairly clear in my opinion on that case.
Why, what do you two see about the slot that should make me want to vote it?
Because literally the best case I could make is "he's derp tunneling" and I don't think tunneling is scummy, I just think it causes some anti-town issues occasionally.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:14 am
by Transcend
insufferable death tunneling, but unlike you i'm not freestyling on a town.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:15 am
by Transcend
how is thor "dunno"
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:17 am
by Blitzkrieg
You use this word again, I will vote you in any game. Mason buddy or not. (Not a mason claim).
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:19 am
by Blitzkrieg
God, 7 pages while I am asleep?
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:20 am
by Transcend
sry
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:24 am
by Blitzkrieg
In post 833, Transcend wrote:Can you stop for two fucking seconds and acknowledge that there is a
chance
that my "gambit" was intended to benefit the town and not to benefit my scum game?
There's a chance either way. You lied trying to take the decision away from us to impose your will. People are naturally going to be pissed about that and want to vote you.
Now, you want to talk? Justify your Maria read in light of their recent posting of asskissing. You read like someone who desperately WANTS their read on Maria to be right and tailors everything to that. I think it's making you look like scum. Show me the scumreaders on you are wring.