Mini 527 - Doom in Valencia - Game Over!

Sammich · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:51 pm

Lucario probably kidnapped him.

Sikario8 · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:09 am

soupfly · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:11 am

hi all, just replaced in!

soupfly · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:48 am

ah, for the record i'm replacing vellon.

Sammich · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:59 pm

So it seems our Mod is active after all, MeMe.

neko2086 · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:31 pm

OK, we seriously need to get something moving here...

Archaist wrote:Well, I've been waiting for everyone to confirm. I don't think we should really start with 2 people missing.

Anybody else see this as lurky? Of course scum wouldn't want discussion to start yet, the chances of suspicion falling on them would be much higher. Same is true for town, yes, but isn't the town more concerned with having discussion to get reads on people? If suspicion falls on you, all the better, since that might give you a clue about people suspecting you. Not so much for scum.

Thoughts?

FOS: Archaist

Sikario8 · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 1:07 am

::nod of approval::

Rebuttal, Archaist? Would you care to plead your case?

BTW

Sammich wrote:
Unvote Lucario vote Sikario

OMGUS obvobvobv

FoS Sammich

once again, seeing as he's discreetly keeping his vote on me. We're all watching you, Sammich.

Archaist · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 1:32 am

neko2086 wrote:Anybody else see this as lurky? Of course scum wouldn't want discussion to start yet, the chances of suspicion falling on them would be much higher. Same is true for town, yes, but isn't the town more concerned with having discussion to get reads on people? If suspicion falls on you, all the better, since that might give you a clue about people suspecting you. Not so much for scum.

Thoughts?

My reason for saying that is because I think that starting without everyone present is excusing absence and failure to confirm. If major discussion begins and someone is missing, then when they or a replacement do come in they basically have a free excuse for lurking and they avoided having to contribute in the early discussion, both of which could benefit the Mafia.

neko2086 · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:36 am

In the meantime, this game is dying, so I would think it's much better to at least get something going rather than let

everyone

have the excuse to lurk.

Besides, do we really know who is "present" at the moment if there's nothing to discuss on? Starting discussion is the only way to find out who is being active and who needs to be replaced.

MeMe · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:17 am

Well, the unfortunate truth is that everyone

does

have an excuse not to post at this point. We don't have to start discussion to know that The Jester & vellon are not being active -- the lack of confirmation & Jenter's subsequent "looking for replacements" post took care of that.

Sikario8 · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:22 am

Well I'm present and willing to act as a catalyst if some discussion breaks out.

soupfly · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:55 am

i replaced vellon so only person missing is Jester. come on, let's start!

neko2086 · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:31 am

then in that case,

unvote, vote: archaist

Sammich · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:35 am

Unvote

soupfly · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:42 am

hmm...let's try

vote: archaist

SirWario · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 1:55 pm

Hello everyone, I'm replacing the jester. I'll just need a about a week to catch up in this thread(sarcasm).

neko2086 · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:23 pm

Welcome, and thanks for replacing.

Wow soupfly, just gunna go with the flow huh?

FOS: Soupfly

soupfly · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:30 pm

awe shucks...you've seen through my evil plan to speed lynching archaist by quickly taking him to L-5! [/sarcasm]

Sammich · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:49 am

Think I'm ready to

Vote Neko2086

Neko2086 wrote:Anybody else see this as lurky? Of course scum wouldn't want discussion to start yet, the chances of suspicion falling on them would be much higher. Same is true for town, yes, but isn't the town more concerned with having discussion to get reads on people? If suspicion falls on you, all the better, since that might give you a clue about people suspecting you. Not so much for scum.

Thoughts?

FOS: Archaist

Like, Achaist makes one post like "I'm waiting for 2 other people lawlz" and then bam. Yes, I see it as lurky but I don't think that would justify suspicion.

Neko wrote: Welcome, and thanks for replacing.

Wow soupfly, just gunna go with the flow huh?

FOS: Soupfly

And where did that come from?

Although Soupfly should've/better provide an explanation for his vote, but I also think it's weird that for all the ruckus Neko made on Archaist, only a FOS came out of it.

Sikario8 · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:56 am

Happy holidays, everyone.

A WEEK OUT OF SCHOOL!

gorckat · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Fri Nov 16, 2007 6:36 am

vote: archaist

MOD: Votecount?

neko2086 · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:29 am

You might not like my style, Sammich, but at least I got some discussion going.

FOS: Gorckat

for the same reason as soupfly

Opportunistic scum, anyone?

soupfly · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:50 am

neko2086 wrote:Opportunistic scum, anyone?

you're supposed to get these kinds of things out of your system in the newbie games.

soupfly · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Sat Nov 17, 2007 1:39 am

you guys can't blame jenter for the lameness of this game given that he's 1) replaced both inactives...and let me say that 2 inactives in a 12 person game is about normal 2) nobody seems to be posting.

game has started people.

SirWario · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Sat Nov 17, 2007 2:16 am

Vote:Neko2086