Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:57 am
Canada is NOT a lesser country!!!!!!
Mafiascum.net
Title Fairy: Killer App Edition (Swipe Right!)
Page 13 of 144
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:58 am
well its not exactly the roman empire
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:59 am
*hugs Cheetory6*In post 300, Cheetory6 wrote:Canada is NOT a lesser country!!!!!!
Happy hugs and love day!
Today we are all equal, but tomorrow, well Canada goes back to being a lesser country, as is tradition.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 10:32 am
shotty, I meant that you out of most people on here I can think of would be the first to complain that something is too PC and not protecting free speech.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 10:38 am
In post 291, wgeurts wrote:In post 290, xofelf wrote:Yeah, idk. That's not a great title tbh, even for a mish mash related joke.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:17 am
Nominate: Shotty
for The Site Antithesis
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:19 am
I'm going to leave now because I actually like this and don't want to "influence the choice".
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:19 am
TOO LATE. I'VE BEEN INFLUENCED.
STRIKE.
IT.
DOWN.
STRIKE.
IT.
DOWN.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:20 am
OH GOD I HAVE BEEN SO INFLUENCED.
@CHEVRE PLEASE HELP ME I HAVE BEEN INFLUENCED
@CHEVRE PLEASE HELP ME I HAVE BEEN INFLUENCED
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:22 am
hold me beeboy. ive been influenced. i dont think im gonna make it.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:23 am
plz stop harassing me
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:25 am
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:29 am
It's ok everything will be ok when Chevre takes down the title request.In post 309, Nahdia wrote:hold me beeboy. ive been influenced. i dont think im gonna make it.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:33 am
But I thought it was pretty legit.
Does it not embody what a great many see in him?
Does it not embody what a great many see in him?
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:35 am
A great many see him as one of the worst people on the site. That's not title-worthy.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:36 am
notoriety is still notable!
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:36 am
nominate sk for took it personally
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:36 am
ouchIn post 314, SleepyKrew wrote:A great many see him as one of the worst people on the site. That's not title-worthy.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:37 am
oh I'm sorry I thought you stepped down as title fairyIn post 314, SleepyKrew wrote:A great many see him as one of the worst people on the site. That's not title-worthy.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:38 am
An antithesis is a direct opposite, not the worst.In post 314, SleepyKrew wrote:A great many see him as one of the worst people on the site. That's not title-worthy.
That he is in stark contrast to most who are on this site is very noteworthy and that he remains despite it is a good thing, which is arguably title worthy.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:40 am
Shotty, snide remarks don't suit you. Not today on hugs and love day.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:40 am
As a fledgling fairy, SleepyKrew's advice is welcomed. I'll value it.
And he's right here. I'm not going to award a title that says "you are everything which this site stands against." Titles are honors, not demerits.
And he's right here. I'm not going to award a title that says "you are everything which this site stands against." Titles are honors, not demerits.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:42 am
sk didn't want my hugIn post 320, xofelf wrote:Shotty, snide remarks don't suit you. Not today on hugs and love day.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:42 am
Just because I stepped down doesn't mean I can't discuss a nomination and why I like it or think it's terrible.In post 318, drmyshottyizsik wrote:oh I'm sorry I thought you stepped down as title fairyIn post 314, SleepyKrew wrote:A great many see him as one of the worst people on the site. That's not title-worthy.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 11:44 am
*Sigh*Chevre wrote:As a fledgling fairy, SleepyKrew's advice is welcomed. I'll value it.
And he's right here. I'm not going to award a title that says "you are everything which this site stands against." Titles are honors, not demerits.
That's not at all what it means, nor how it is intended.
Is that not obvious? I thought it was obvious.