Mini 1772 ~ Game Over

Postie · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:11 am

In post 74, Gale Wing Srock wrote:
Postie
, you ignored my question for you. Whats up?

I'll answer your question if you can tell me what you're hoping to gain from my answer.

In post 74, Gale Wing Srock wrote:Regarding GuyFawkes, I just got a weird tinge from 58 during my reread.

Oh, fair enough. Still don't see it though.

Gale Wing Srock · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:22 am

FA

, want to talk?

Postie

, I want to understand if my read on BlueTrin and Lovelygiant is something that matches yours or not. Makes me read the players better that way.

Also, you ignored two pages and went for an RVS, any reason for that?

Frozen Angel · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:24 am

what do you wanna talk about?

I just skimmed the thread so far. will read in details in about 2 hours or something

Gale Wing Srock · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:34 am

BlueTrin and Lovelygiant seem scummy to me, what do you think?

And town lean on GuyFawkes is what I got till 53. But Lowell's certain town read on him after 58 is making me think.

58 to me seems like he wants to be read as town, which I am not getting atm.

BlueTrin · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:49 am

In post 73, Frozen Angel wrote:what do you know about Psychology Bluetrin?

Not much, but enough to just understand that GuyFawkes went serious because GWS post had a different tone, you don't need to be a genius to understand that. Somehow this eluded GWS

BlueTrin · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 12:57 am

In post 72, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 8, BlueTrin wrote:My favourite target

VOTE: Frozen Angel

In post 54, Postie wrote:VOTE: Frozen Angel

Because she'll be calling for my policy lynch right about now.

I love you guys too!

You were out yesterday ?

Noticed that you don't post on Friday evenings

Anyway, let's start the game, innit ?

Gale Wing Srock · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 1:01 am

Either you don't understand not getting in the way of things, or you are scum. I am leaning on the latter right now, because none of your plays are helping us atm.

Pedit: This I got to see.

Creature · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 1:06 am

I don't see what's wrong with 57.

What's the best way to get out of RVS? Reading the votes.
What are we earning from reading these votes? Nothing.
Then how it helps? People will stop trolling and post their opinions.
And what are we earning from this? We're getting real tells.

BlueTrin · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 1:25 am

In post 81, Gale Wing Srock wrote:Either you don't understand not getting in the way of things, or you are scum. I am leaning on the latter right now, because none of your plays are helping us atm.

Pedit: This I got to see.

Well since you insist on this point, I would see it as slightly scummy as you are rigid on your position and insist that you could see something useful in my posts in RVS, because nobody could claim that these posts were not just random RVS while waiting for more players to join. And keeping the bullshit in this is very anti town as it causes distraction.

Almost50 · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 2:52 am

In post 57, Gale Wing Srock wrote:Almost50, lets hope we get to play a while together this game. And I don't think you are crazy, because your catchup post in Open 626 was quiet insightful.

Why thank you for the compliment. Still, the fact is I tend to think outside the box and it sometimes leads me astray. It also almost always makes me look scummy, but to those who know me (RC, FA, Ranger .. etc.) it makes me an obv!BAD!Town. You're welcome to check some of my previous games to see what I mean.

Frozen Angel · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 4:04 am

In post 58, GuyFawkes wrote:not trolling, just enjoying myself during RVS

I smell a weird defensiveness in here

BlueTrin · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 4:05 am

In post 82, Creature wrote:I don't see what's wrong with 57.

What's the best way to get out of RVS? Reading the votes.
What are we earning from reading these votes? Nothing.
Then how it helps? People will stop trolling and post their opinions.
And what are we earning from this? We're getting real tells.

Very True,

There is nothing wrong, with #57, his reaction over afterwards is a bit of a stretch.

In post 64, Gale Wing Srock wrote:
Lowell
idk about that, but GuyFawkes just got serious after my post. And why are you town reading him?

Pista
, I am not liking Blue because he is mixing troll posts with serious ones and is throwing around votes to get them to stick. Post 51 after 49 is what has pinged me the most, so thats why my vote is on him.

Lovelygiant
, well GuyFawkes just mentioned that he was having fun in RVS. What do you think about that? Doesn't seem like he was faking with troll posts as Blue seems to be doing.

First, of all he says that I am wasting other people time in RVS, which is fair enough, but as you can see nothing was going on so it was actually the best way to get people to start talking, this is why it wasn't useful. You can see as well that we stopped immediately as the game was becoming serious.

So now he says that I must be scum for throwing random votes during a part of the game

where he was inactive and neither helping or participating and where people were just trolling around

? Then he accuses GuyFawkes of becoming serious when

he implicitly asked himself the game to be more serious.

This does not make any sense.

So I wanted to know if it was a reaction test and kind of wanted to know if it mostly a reaction test, it does not seems so.

In post 74, Gale Wing Srock wrote:
In post 71, BlueTrin wrote:
I understand he wants to get the real game to start.
It is just that his list is like ... Wtf ? Did you understand that people were just playing around ?
Then he wonders why people are getting serious after trying to get some order in the game ???

Not scum, just nonsense

That is what I wanted to do, and that is what has happened, but can you tell me what you think is nonsense in my post (be specific)? and why do you think I am a psychopath?

Also
Postie
, you ignored my question for you. Whats up?
Regarding GuyFawkes, I just got a weird tinge from 58 during my reread.

So excuse me if I don't take his opinion too seriously.
Although I am grateful for him to start the game and make us exit RVS.

So let's continue and play the game now.

Frozen Angel · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 4:05 am

In post 60, Lowell wrote:guy is town. GWS is scum. That last post was an obvious try-hard.

I had the complete vise versa read.

why an attempt to end RVS is scummy move and a guy who responded I'm not trolling I' just keeping the game in RVS is town?

Frozen Angel · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 4:06 am

In post 84, Almost50 wrote:
In post 57, Gale Wing Srock wrote:Almost50, lets hope we get to play a while together this game. And I don't think you are crazy, because your catchup post in Open 626 was quiet insightful.

Why thank you for the compliment. Still, the fact is I tend to think outside the box and it sometimes leads me astray. It also almost always makes me look scummy, but to those who know me (RC, FA, Ranger .. etc.) it makes me an obv!BAD!Town. You're welcome to check some of my previous games to see what I mean.

nah don't buddy up to fast boddy! lol

I don't know this guy! who is he?

but siriously. lol

BlueTrin · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 4:08 am

In post 87, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 60, Lowell wrote:guy is town. GWS is scum. That last post was an obvious try-hard.

I had the complete vise versa read.

why an attempt to end RVS is scummy move and a guy who responded I'm not trolling I' just keeping the game in RVS is town?

GWS is probably town for ending RVS, you are right.

Frozen Angel · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 9:07 am

what happned to your read about gale reaction after that post?! :/

Its just uncomfortable to see how you just backed of when I shared my read ...

Postie · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 9:22 am

In post 76, Gale Wing Srock wrote:
Postie
, I want to understand if my read on BlueTrin and Lovelygiant is something that matches yours or not. Makes me read the players better that way.

Well, the tone of BlueTrin's posts makes me uneasy, but it might be that he just always talks that way so ehh (I'll go take a look at some of his past games later when I'm not phone posting). Not sure on lovelygiant either, but I think I have gut townlean.
Why did you want to know about these two specifically and why did you choose to ask me about them over any other player?

In post 89, BlueTrin wrote:GWS is probably town for ending RVS

Why?

BlueTrin · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 9:38 am

In post 90, Frozen Angel wrote:what happned to your read about gale reaction after that post?! :/

Its just uncomfortable to see how you just backed of when I shared my read ...

In post 91, Postie wrote:
In post 76, Gale Wing Srock wrote:
Postie
, I want to understand if my read on BlueTrin and Lovelygiant is something that matches yours or not. Makes me read the players better that way.

Well, the tone of BlueTrin's posts makes me uneasy, but it might be that he just always talks that way so ehh (I'll go take a look at some of his past games later when I'm not phone posting). Not sure on lovelygiant either, but I think I have gut townlean.
Why did you want to know about these two specifically and why did you choose to ask me about them over any other player?

In post 89, BlueTrin wrote:GWS is probably town for ending RVS

Why?

The RVS purpose is only to get people to talk.
Once people are talking RVS is not much more useful unless we just do reaction tests.

By ending RVS, GWS helps us to have more constructive discussions, this is usually pro town. It could also be scum trying to look townie, we will see.

FA, he only moved from slightly scummy to slightly townish in my mind, this is not a massive difference and we are at the beginning of D1. What is the most important is to get the game going so we have more accurate reads.

lovelygiant · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 11:00 am

So far, I like anyone who's not trying to perpetuate RVS and trolly unhelpful nonsense.

My vote stays comfortably in place for now.

GuyFawkes · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 11:41 am

In post 93, lovelygiant wrote:So far, I like anyone who's not trying to perpetuate RVS and trolly unhelpful nonsense.

My vote stays comfortably in place for now.

oh I disagree. my "trolling" was very helpful nonsense.

It exposed you as scum.

Anybody that wasn't looking to make a BS case (ie town) took it for what it was. Only scum (ie you) would try to get somebody lynched for it.

GuyFawkes · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 11:46 am

In post 85, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 58, GuyFawkes wrote:not trolling, just enjoying myself during RVS

I smell a weird defensiveness in here

its probably my cologne

GuyFawkes · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 11:49 am

In post 87, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 60, Lowell wrote:guy is town. GWS is scum. That last post was an obvious try-hard.

I had the complete vise versa read.

why an attempt to end RVS is scummy move and a guy who responded I'm not trolling I' just keeping the game in RVS is town?

thats not what I said

I said I was just enjoying myself DURING RVS

Dierfire · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 3:18 pm

In post 75, Postie wrote:
In post 74, Gale Wing Srock wrote:
Postie
, you ignored my question for you. Whats up?

I'll answer your question if you can tell me what you're hoping to gain from my answer.

In post 91, Postie wrote:
In post 76, Gale Wing Srock wrote:
Postie
, I want to understand if my read on BlueTrin and Lovelygiant is something that matches yours or not. Makes me read the players better that way.

Well, the tone of BlueTrin's posts makes me uneasy, but it might be that he just always talks that way so ehh (I'll go take a look at some of his past games later when I'm not phone posting). Not sure on lovelygiant either, but I think I have gut townlean.
Why did you want to know about these two specifically and why did you choose to ask me about them over any other player?

Postie's 75 feels theatrical if all that she needed to hear was "I want to know if my reads match yours" to answer. Her 91 still strikes me as slightly theatrical but the questions are more legitimate.

UNVOTE: Gale Wing Srock
VOTE: Postie

Lowell · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 4:56 pm

I guess GWS is going to double-down on that try-hard thing by trying even harder to look like an active player. Whatever. There are worse things, I guess, but I'm not sold.

I like FA for town. Mostly. And dislike that guy (I forget who) who felt the need to give a treatise on why he doesn't like RVS. Dumb.

Aquanim · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Sat Mar 05, 2016 5:19 pm