But now it's page 4 (nice work getting us there btw), and my vote is no longer required here. Also, him trying to get you to self hammer is shady.
But I did like my Kel vote a lot better. Let's do that again! VOTE: Kelbris
- Ari
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:51 am
by Davsto
From now on, votecounts will include any V/LAs.
V/LA:
Extrapolated Eagle until Sunday
shos until Monday
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:33 am
by beeboy
UNVOTE:
:/ page 4 isn't indicative
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:58 am
by SnarkySnowman
To clarify - lynching me is the same as a no lynch, and night killing me is the same as a no kill. I only claim early because I know I often get mistaken for not town and I wanted to not be a distraction. By the same logic I'm pretty sure I wasn't going to be night killed anyway so
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:20 am
by Holly and Sugar
Snarky you never claim that.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 8:11 am
by shos
Egopostttt
Im vla till monday lol guys
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 9:41 am
by kelbris
@Elsa and Anna that "bad" post was simply an attempt to elaborate on WHY I decided to vote for beeboy. Kinda surprised that everyone here thinks that an unwarranted D1 claim is actually to be believed, in the past such a claim actually raised a few more eyebrows (which is why I took said attitude to this game). I can't name names or examples, but it has happened in at least 1 game I have played in. My "should have seen it coming" post, was me commenting on the fact that it was a joke-claim, a technique I had not actually experienced in Mafia on this site before. Also, yes, I do like to elaborate on things and no, it is not alignment indicative. It is just part of my nature that when I explain something, I may/may not go into a great amount of detail.
P.S. I will not be available to post today (I live in the AEST time zone), as I have a chess tournament to run IRL.
If I wanted you to self hammer I would have started a real post based on how your 2nd post vaguely resembles a policy lynch which would actually make you mad since town was scum reading you for that. I was just trying to lighten the mood <3 =D You wouldn't self hammer and give me the satisfaction of succeeding which is why I was comfortable having you at L-1.
Let's have a fun game ok?
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 10:22 am
by Elsa and Anna
sure
But still I don't know how should I sort that. I will look into it again tomorrow. g night
~Elsa
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 11:41 am
by Holly and Sugar
Trying to contact my other head so we can play the game properly together orz.
Really? I mean see my reasoning for it, is that not smart?
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:14 pm
by Klingoncelt
In post 79, SnarkySnowman wrote:To clarify - lynching me is the same as a no lynch, and night killing me is the same as a no kill. I only claim early because I know I often get mistaken for not town and I wanted to not be a distraction. By the same logic I'm pretty sure I wasn't going to be night killed anyway so
In post 79, SnarkySnowman wrote:To clarify - lynching me is the same as a no lynch, and night killing me is the same as a no kill. I only claim early because I know I often get mistaken for not town and I wanted to not be a distraction. By the same logic I'm pretty sure I wasn't going to be night killed anyway so
In post 79, SnarkySnowman wrote:To clarify - lynching me is the same as a no lynch, and night killing me is the same as a no kill. I only claim early because I know I often get mistaken for not town and I wanted to not be a distraction. By the same logic I'm pretty sure I wasn't going to be night killed anyway so
You're unlynchable and unkillable?
Sounds a little overpowered to me.
VOTE: Snarky
I agree wouldn't hurt to try right?
This is one reason not to claim it.
Another is so you can eat NKs by being super towny and not giving a shit what people think.
Now you're gonna distract us, bait a lynch to test the claim, and not get NK targeted.
and if Snowman is actually lynchbait a lot (i'm only assuming this from your posts about yourself, Snowman, so apologies!), then i'm guessing he rarely gets nightkilled. so i can kind of understand him trying to just out it now... even if i don't personally agree.
i dislike beeboy's 'wouldn't hurt to try' vote! like.. it's kinda setting itself up to be useless. because yeah, it WOULD hurt to try! we lose a lynch!
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:39 pm
by A Real Scourge
didn't mean to quote the votecount, sorry about that.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:44 pm
by beeboy
In post 95, A Real Scourge wrote:i dislike beeboy's 'wouldn't hurt to try' vote! like.. it's kinda setting itself up to be useless. because yeah, it WOULD hurt to try! we lose a lynch!
Don't be blind that is a total bs claim.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:55 pm
by itlepip
any vigis, yeah snarky is a godlike shot that comes around once in a lifetime.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:02 pm
by Elsa and Anna
VOTE: Beeboy
We need to talk about the not-voting Beeboy thing FA
Like you can't just go in and try to antagonize me and then try to blow it off when I react badly to it.
You knew that I'd react badly to it. why the f even do it? don't try to shrug this off.