Page 22 of 77

Posted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:44 pm
by Elsa and Anna
Shos's last ones are pinging me.

Posted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:49 pm
by Elsa and Anna
+

its pinging me as well. those reads are fake and forced

~Elsa

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:01 am
by beeboy
I honestly still want to lynch Kelbris.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 5:27 am
by Davsto
Holly and Sugar is being replaced.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:38 am
by Raskolnikov
beeboy can you readslist for me pretty please?

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:43 am
by beeboy
{}
{Elsa and Anna, , Raskolnikov, Extrapolated Eagle}
{Iraonavp, AristoCow}
{Holly and Sugar, shos, Alchemist21}
{Klingoncelt, A Real Scourge}
{kelbris, SnarkySnowman, }

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:53 am
by Raskolnikov
ok you don't get lynched today

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:54 am
by beeboy
o.o What made that so special?

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:55 am
by beeboy
In post 532, beeboy wrote:o.o What made that so special?

Don't answer this actually it would help scum.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:21 am
by shos
VOTE: Elsa and Anna

I'm past page 7, and it looks like the best thing I currently have, which is mostly meta and town-leans on other people.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:31 am
by shos
half the game done.

currently very much OK with beeboy or E&A dying, optional is klingon. I'm pretty sure Snarky is in fact town, Rask and Eagle are my best townreads. The rest are all sorts of meh. Has Alchemist risen in posting pace or is he stuck like me?

I'm gonna take a shower maybe and try more later because I am just blown away this week, honestly, I have no time to breath. Lucky this is the only game at day I'm in.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:53 am
by Elsa and Anna
This feels super familiar.
VOTE: Shos
Lynch this. Ring boy is scum again.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:58 am
by Davsto
SnarkySnowman is being prodded.

He has (expired on 2016-03-02 22:00:00) to post.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:06 pm
by SnarkySnowman
Didn't realize I was already up for prodding again, my bad!

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 2:05 pm
by kelbris
@Elsa and Anna, in what way is this familiar? I am curious as to in what way Shos's ISO means that he is scum.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 2:40 pm
by Alchemist21
In post 519, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 504, iraonavp wrote:
In post 503, Klingoncelt wrote:If I had made the above post I would be scumread so hard that players not in this game would leave their own games to come in here and vote for me.

There's something that is very wrong about this quote related to the implication that I'm being treated differently for some reason, but I'm not sure how to explain this.

My post was fine anyways.

VOTE: Klingoncelt


You aren't being treated differently, but the fact is that you
expect
to be treated differently by way of us allowing your bad posts and AtE to prevent your being voted.

Saying that Alchemist21 manipulated you into saying things that you didn't want to say was the big mistake. Not "a" big mistake, "the" big mistake. See, I've played some games with Alch too. He's a clever one, as Town vs Scum, he's great. He's dangerous as Scum vs Town too.

So, let's say you're today's lynch. You flip Scum it looks pretty good (but by no means confirmable) for Ank. You flip Town, Ank (or I) likely gets lynched tomorrow. Associatives have been established.


When have you ever seen my scum game?

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 3:48 pm
by Alchemist21
Rereading the game up to page 6. I didn't realize Raskol had voted Snarky for his claim before even Beeboy, and it puts him on my radar, but I guess it's a little more understandable if he wanted to test the claim, and there was other stuff that makes Beeboy worse.

In the other hand, on the issuenof Snarky's claim I wouldn't be against pip's suggestion of a vig test if there is one. The Vig's more likely to hit Town N1 anyway, and we should be playing as if we don't have a Town-sourced Night Kill, so if the Bulletproof part of Snakry's claim is true, a vig shot there validates the claim and Town doesn't really lose much (arguably it gains information if it validates the claim).

As for the unlynchable aspect, his claim is basically that Town automatically loses what would otherwise be a lylo situation. So we should treat what would be the day before lylo as actual lylo, and in the event we're wrong but the game's not over, then Snarky is the unquestionable lynch for the next Day.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:20 pm
by Klingoncelt
In post 540, Alchemist21 wrote:

When have you ever seen my scum game?


From the time I started here in every game I was in I would ISO as many players as possible that I didn't know.

Not ISO in the game, but go to their profile page and check out the differences between their Town games and their Scum games.

As either alignment you're subtle and clever. You'd make an excellent detective or attorney.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:23 pm
by Alchemist21
Well this is the first I'm hearing of this, but thank you. :p

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:32 pm
by Klingoncelt
Unofficial
Vote Count:

A Real Scourge (2): Holly and Sugar, AristoCow
Raskolnikov (2): kelbris, Extrapolated Eagle
iraonavp (2): Alchemist21, Klingoncelt
shos (2): SnarkySnowman, Elsa and Anna
AristoCow (1): Raskolnikov
Klingoncelt (1): iraonavp
kelbris (1): beeboy
Elsa and Anna(1): shos

Not Voting (2): shos, A Real Scourge

Deadline in (expired on 2016-03-04 23:25:00)


We need to start coming together.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:34 pm
by Klingoncelt
In post 543, Alchemist21 wrote:Well this is the first I'm hearing of this, but thank you. :p


You're welcome.

I used to post it on Day 1 in games I was in but I stopped mentioning it last summer, because some people don't believe in meta. Foolish mortals.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 6:03 pm
by Davsto
Holly and Sugar is replaced by Dream Man!

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 6:23 pm
by shos
Hmm, curious, E&A, indeed what here is similar to my scumgame? I don't see ANY resemblence

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 8:59 pm
by iraonavp
Extrapolated Eagle, can you summarize why you think Raskolnikov is scum-aligned?

I'm not sure why you seem to believe this.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 9:09 pm
by Extrapolated Eagle
In post 548, iraonavp wrote:Extrapolated Eagle, can you summarize why you think Raskolnikov is scum-aligned?

I'm not sure why you seem to believe this.

Again: fluff, OMGUS and avoiding game/thread. The guy reads straight up fake. I can do another pbpa but I think I already did that. Honestly I'm just frustrated that we aren't moving this way right now and it's demotivating. :/ I'll see if I can make another case soonish. :/