Mafiascum.net

In post 190, Raskolnikov wrote:Has anyone seen RC or FA use AtE as scum before? Personally I'm pretty inexperienced with these players

In post 193, Elsa and Anna wrote:for the record, Raskol is fully aware that FA is mostly known for AtEing and that I am somewhat known for it as well.

Him pretending that he doesn't is tantamount to scumclaiming.

In post 194, Raskolnikov wrote:Deathtunneling on someone because you don't like what they did a game before is absurd and I don't see why they would do this when they could have /out ed when seeing the playerlist. I think town RC would be more inclined to just ignore beeboy rather than make a big deal out of this, and I've heard of him using gambits like this (especially involving AtE) as scum for towncred. Furthermore since it's between RC and beeboy and I don't think FA is involved I don't know why FA would be fine with this if they were town, whereas if scum it makes sense for her to stay silent and let RC try this gambit.

The tldr is it's either really reckless townplay or a scum AtE play and I see the latter as more likely.

these few posts really make me weary about Rask.

Cowbells, are you serious? why do you have a problem with me?

I wanted to see his reaction. I feel if he was town he would have addressed me directly rather than saying what he did.

I mean I could be wrong but you don't learn without making a few mistakes!

I remember scumRC being aggro, but I can't remember if or when I played with Town RC to know if this is out of place for their Town game.

In post 201, Raskolnikov wrote:I wanted to see his reaction. I feel if he was town he would have addressed me directly rather than saying what he did.

I mean I could be wrong but you don't learn without making a few mistakes!

who is this 'he' you're talking about? also can you please explain the three posts i quoted and why you said what you did about Elsa and Anna's meta?

In post 202, Alchemist21 wrote:

@Mod; My vote should be on Beeboy, not Kelbris.

I remember scumRC being aggro, but I can't remember if or when I played with Town RC to know if this is out of place for their Town game.

ScumRC is really Aggro, TOWN RC is demoralized Aggro.
Hard to say which this is.

Rask is interesting, I gotta read what he said with BeeBoy's ability to target. Possible scumteam I guess.

Could vote Beeboy, just because I like Elsa & Anna more.
Will talk with TheCow if he's around.

- Ari

On one hand I want to go into it because of what you're asking but on the other I don't want to upset them if they're actually town.

So I'm leaving it there and you can come to your own conclusions.

This is a game and I just want to make what I think are the right decisions but if I end up too involved in drama from it it's just not worth it.

mmm, i see, i made an assumption about something. apologies. (though if i'm right about what it was, i'd hope that you wouldn't want to upset them about it if they're scum, too)

Rask, what you haven't explained is the meta thing? and if you have, i really didn't get it. you asked about their meta because you were looking for a reaction, even though you already knew their meta?

I can't name the game but I will say this, it is not game of pokes.

kelbris, the only thing you've answered is, what i feel, not a very pressing question. do you have anything else to say about the other players?

ugh, this site is totally messing with my posting style! who says 'apologies'?? not me! geez, where are my emojis at

So.... @rask, I read your post. And it looks like your entire problem with me is my difference in playstyle and beliefs. So I'm going to stop you right there. So I'm not going to go through there and point out why your response is so disgusting but here's a few points:

1. You have a problem with me handing out town reads- like wut. You're scared there's not going to be enough people to lynch at the end of the day or what? My most accurate reads have always been based on extrapolations from the first couple pages and they're more often right, see my most recent newbie game and you could be anyone 4. Its how I read people and it's ridiculous to sit there paranoid of everyone at the start anyways, you don't get anywhere. You have to start with a theory, with some trust in one place and you move on from there. If that doesn't work out you reevaluate, etc. I don't legitimately believe that anyone can actually play the game like that as town.

2. Really? You're going to jump on me because I said HIlAry instead of unnecessary fluff? Sorry. I'm tired. I just got back from a weekend camping trip. I was still in a fun mood. Thanks for helping me remember this game isn't supposed to be fun by going out of your way to pick me apart.

@kel vote rask and when he flips scum you're cleared, k?

Ok Rask now my town ATE . He saw that in lol game. That was a shitty post there ...

and when the hell did I went in ATE in this game?

I'm so damned emotional as both town and scum if anyone wonders so thats NAI for me.

~Elsa

Kelbris is pinging me so damned hard ... *facepalm*

~Elsa

Ok Ari is so damned better than this ...

I'm kind of confused

~Elsa

that post was actually answering a question on the previous page about what game I had seen the whole "claim without reason = not town-aligned" idea. Anyway Here are my opinions on the other players:

beeboy: null, whilst I don't like the fake claim that goaded me into this situation, I would not exactly call it scummy either, which is why beeboy is null for now.
Rask: scum, he is well aware of FA's use of AtE, so unless he can explain his lie in this regard, I will always see him as scum.
Snarkysnowman: neutral (neither town nor scum), I dislike his unkillable claim as in terms of SCPs the only one I can think of is SCP-682, who would most certainly NOT be on the foundations side.
Aristophanes: null, need a bit more content before I can come to a conclusion in this regard.

more reads will come soon, but in the meantime:

VOTE: rask

In post 93, beeboy wrote:

In post 92, Klingoncelt wrote:

In post 79, SnarkySnowman wrote:To clarify - lynching me is the same as a no lynch, and night killing me is the same as a no kill. I only claim early because I know I often get mistaken for not town and I wanted to not be a distraction. By the same logic I'm pretty sure I wasn't going to be night killed anyway so

You're unlynchable and unkillable?

Sounds a little overpowered to me.

VOTE: Snarky

I agree wouldn't hurt to try right?

If Jesters and Mafia Traitors hadn't stopped being a thing I'd say Snarky was one of those.

In post 190, Raskolnikov wrote:Has anyone seen RC or FA use AtE as scum before? Personally I'm pretty inexperienced with these players

Yes, I have.

They use it as Town, too.

In post 215, kelbris wrote:that post was actually answering a question on the previous page about what game I had seen the whole "claim without reason = not town-aligned" idea. Anyway Here are my opinions on the other players:

beeboy: null, whilst I don't like the fake claim that goaded me into this situation, I would not exactly call it scummy either, which is why beeboy is null for now.
Rask: scum, he is well aware of FA's use of AtE, so unless he can explain his lie in this regard, I will always see him as scum.
Snarkysnowman: neutral (neither town nor scum), I dislike his unkillable claim as in terms of SCPs the only one I can think of is SCP-682, who would most certainly NOT be on the foundations side.
Aristophanes: null, need a bit more content before I can come to a conclusion in this regard.

more reads will come soon, but in the meantime:

VOTE: rask

i know you were answering a question, i just wanted to squeeze some reads and particupation outta you!
i agree that i want Rask to explain all that.
i think you need to read the wiki again if the only unkillable SCP you can think of 682! i'd go looking, but there are probably hundreds that Snowman could be at this point. well, taking into account the 'doesn't count as a player for not being endgamed by scum', thing, it could be quite a bit less, but still. that, and, 682 is definitely not aligned with the Chaos Insurgency, either. i think all of the SCPs are unaligned cosmic horrors, so.. like.. someone is probably a sentient window pane or something.

not sure if i like the list. i mean, it's full of nulls and the only things you've talked about regarding players are claims. beeboy's fakeclaim, the unkillable claim... and well, i guess you talked about Rask's meta thing.
why do you need more content from AriCow? they haven't been lurking! do you need more content from everyone? why just AriCow?

In post 210, Extrapolated Eagle wrote: it's ridiculous to sit there paranoid of everyone at the start anyways, you don't get anywhere. You have to start with a theory, with some trust in one place and you move on from there. If that doesn't work out you reevaluate, etc.

rad. like, out of game for a sec, i like the temporary trust thing because being uncertain is a big problem for me!

Klingon, do you have a read on Elsa and Anna right now?

In post 219, A Real Scourge wrote:Klingon, do you have a read on Elsa and Anna right now?

No, their antagonism towards Beeboy - and vice versa - clouds the read.

are you a Treestump?

In post 220, shos wrote:

I am officially back from VLA. Will fully catch up and all tomorrow.

In a 9-page game you need time to fully catch up?

You rolled Scum, didn't you.

VOTE: Shos

sadz