Mafiascum.net

In post 3323, Shiro wrote:Was I supposed to abstain from voting ? A lynch had to happen regardless of how much I liked the wagons. Do you disagree with that ?

Actually yes, especially on Day 1 - you don't vote town reads.
You chose to.
You chose to do it with no explanation at all.
That is screwy.

In post 3324, Muffin wrote:

In post 3311, Thor665 wrote:Yo, Muffin, back up your gak more - because I'm not unvoting you

Implying I give a flying Smurf.

You got caught. You've been asked like 15 times to back up your retarded case on Shiro but you can't do it. Gee, I wonder why that is?

Yeah, gosh, it's really weird how I keep ducking that - you've got me.
What other brilliant insights to this game have you been reading and noting while totally not misrepping me and paying attention to what is going on?

In post 3325, Thor665 wrote:Actually yes, especially on Day 1 - you don't vote town reads.
You chose to.
You chose to do it with no explanation at all.
That is screwy.

......really? I was under the impression you had to if necessarry cause you need the flips info in order to see how people handled said person

In post 3311, Thor665 wrote:First off - let's rebut "name mentions" I give you Post #2434 or 2436

Awww our little Thor is making progress! He's still throwing a temper tantrum but he's at least doing what he should have done many pages ago!

Okay so that brings it to, what, something like 5 anen posts and 3 pere posts? That's great and all but you haven't addressed what I perceive to be a clear progression of reads. Voting a townread D1 at deadline is not as scummy as you're trying to paint it to be. Nobody knows anything D1.

You've done nothing to dissuade me from the conclusion that you're just trying to bully town into mislynching a newbie.

In post 3326, Shiro wrote:......really? I was under the impression you had to if necessarry cause you need the flips info in order to see how people handled said person

So you intentionally voted a town read in order to verify he was a townread via lynch?

In post 3327, Muffin wrote:Awww our little Thor is making progress! He's still throwing a temper tantrum but he's at least doing what he should have done many pages ago!

I did do it pages ago, you just got *really* weird about translating what I said and induced uncertainty into the conversation.
I said he talked about one more than the other - he did.
You then, for some reason, needed me to prove something that was obvious.
Shock.

In post 3327, Muffin wrote:Okay so that brings it to, what, something like 5 anen posts and 3 pere posts?

Okay? Sure.
That changes nothing and is not applicable to what I said. But, sure.

In post 3327, Muffin wrote:That's great and all but you haven't addressed what I perceive to be a clear progression of reads. Voting a townread D1 at deadline is not as scummy as you're trying to paint it to be. Nobody knows anything D1.

Voting a town read is exactly as scummy as I am painting it to be - and this is definitely an odd shift from you from the "Thor is changing goalposts" gabble you were raising hell about mere seconds ago.
I don't care if you like his progression of reads - what I care about is your intentional misrep and playing dumb dance routine and how scummy and terrible it was.

In post 3327, Muffin wrote:You've done nothing to dissuade me from the conclusion that you're just trying to bully town into mislynching a newbie.

Yesterday I bullied town into lynching a 'not Newbie'.
So...yeah...what is your theory here? That Thor is desperate to pick on Newbies?
Riiiiiiight.

Explain again your logical presumption about number of times a name is mentioned (while not reading enough to understand pronouns exit) and also that quality/quantity thing.
Your case is a joke.
It was pushed on misrep and derp.
Defend it.

It said forcereplace

In post 3332, TierShift wrote:It said forcereplace

Bah, I do not agree. But well, this isn't the place.

As per 3310 Axle: AFK for about 24

meanwhile:
You could all, Ya know vote "the scummy guy, 3318 that is "forced as shit"" 3276

In post 3330, Thor665 wrote:

Vote: Izarael

Izar is scummy because Muffin fell for his scum plot to have a vanilla townie push his case or something?

In b4 axle is a thor alt.

In post 3336, Scripten wrote:

In post 3330, Thor665 wrote:

Vote: Izarael

Izar is scummy because Muffin fell for his scum plot to have a vanilla townie push his case or something?

No, but the case was incredibly empty and three people bought into it.
I am of the opinion at least one is scum and I have mild town reads on Tier besides this derp.

Go read Iz when being questioned by me about the case being presented by Muffin - what is your read on that?

In post 3325, Thor665 wrote:

In post 3323, Shiro wrote:Was I supposed to abstain from voting ? A lynch had to happen regardless of how much I liked the wagons. Do you disagree with that ?

Actually yes, especially on Day 1 - you don't vote town reads.
You chose to.
You chose to do it with no explanation at all.
That is screwy.

I don't see an issue with Shiro's votes.
She had a vote on Aneninen. She had discussion with and about Aneninen that resulted in not scumreading him. She moved her vote to Pere, because it seemed that a compromise lynch had to happen.

I find the progression of her thoughts and actions very appropriate and consistent, and I don't find her Pere vote scummy. How would yesterday have gone differently if she'd voted differently? Pere would still have gotten lynched. It seemed inevitable. This is a downright stubborn group of players that is probably going to end up with compromise lynches every day at this rate.

Would any other vote from her have still been scummy? Because it seems like this attention on her vote is solely because it was on the lynch wagon. And I think it's the wrong vote to be focusing on, frankly.

I'm still not sure that I buy Boon's claim. I really think we're dealing with multiball/SK setup, which makes bulletproof scum more probable, imo. I don't trust the claim but it does make sense with a lot of his behavior.

I'll take muffin's spot in the thor push.

@Iz whose vote do u think is the most suspicious ?

@Thor That lurksack that you mixed me up with did sonething that according to you was a reason for Tier to vote me or find a good enough reason to explain it. Isnt that enough of a reason to find who u mixed me up with ? The person might be scum escaping the lynch because he is being a lurksack no ?

In post 3340, Izariael wrote:Would any other vote from her have still been scummy? Because it seems like this attention on her vote is solely because it was on the lynch wagon. And I think it's the wrong vote to be focusing on, frankly.

No, a number of other votes would not have been as scummy.

In post 3343, Shiro wrote:@Thor That lurksack that you mixed me up with did sonething that according to you was a reason for Tier to vote me or find a good enough reason to explain it. Isnt that enough of a reason to find who u mixed me up with ? The person might be scum escaping the lynch because he is being a lurksack no ?

Agreed, they might be scum.
Want to vote Iz?

In post 3313, Thor665 wrote:@Tier - straight up question; how do you feel about Muffin's"logical" thought that I must have meant quality instead of quantity?

@Tier - as long as you're taking up the mantle, could you not take up the dodging

In post 3344, Thor665 wrote:

In post 3340, Izariael wrote:Would any other vote from her have still been scummy? Because it seems like this attention on her vote is solely because it was on the lynch wagon. And I think it's the wrong vote to be focusing on, frankly.

No, a number of other votes would not have been as scummy.

Oh? Such as?

In post 3343, Shiro wrote:@Iz whose vote do u think is the most suspicious ?

3145

In post 3329, Aegor wrote:

Muffin,

Vanilla Townie

, has been modkilled Day 2.

gawddammit Muffinnnn...... you were quickly becoming my top townread

Now who am I going to mindlessly sheep since I'm making no effort to evaluate the game and was just supporting any empty case I could find? [/sarcasm]

In post 3343, Shiro wrote:@Thor That lurksack that you mixed me up with did sonething that according to you was a reason for Tier to vote me or find a good enough reason to explain it. Isnt that enough of a reason to find who u mixed me up with ? The person might be scum escaping the lynch because he is being a lurksack no ?

He has no interest in doing so because he's too busy hiding behind his OMGUS vote on me.