Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 9:17 am
The Aneninen shit is coming but jesus fuck I think I'm going to have to declare V/LA again because I'm snowed in with schoolwork.
In post 1949, T S O wrote:Thor - because I feel my vote is more fruitful where it is.
I'm not particularly townreading Peregrine like I was and he could be scum, I guess, because I usually townread Peregrine when I ISO him in isolation and that really hasn't happened this game. Maybe that's indicative for Peregrine being scum. Maybe it's indicative of him having an off game. I don't know. At the moment I don't really care either because I don't have enough time for this game in general.
In post 1910, Garmr wrote:A example of town boon skies being conscious of his plays in a past game would of been nice.
In post 1914, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 1909, Aneninen wrote:Can you define that concept for me?
He's barely interacting with anyone. He's just posting enough passive analysis to fly under the radar.
In post 1943, Thor665 wrote:In post 1929, Garmr wrote:1. nope not that i can remember
Does that concern you in an attempt to comment that his play here looks townish? You appear to have no frame of reference, yeah?
In post 1929, Garmr wrote:2A.Muffin-I can see him buddying script a bit and I don't know if anyone's used this as a scum tell but he seems to be leeching you. If a strong player is pushing a wagon just jump on and throw down a few points and don't provide anything to really push it. I think the closet thing to a push is saying come join the wagon and oh look at the history of events in the way I paint it (521)
2B.Scriptian-The town cred thing in a lesser extent and the jump onto the pere wagon in a bigger extent. It didn't feel natural to me.
OrNot2B.Davey- quotes gm says she feels towny and doesn't give a reason why those quotes feel towny. Plays a devil adovocate like role in the thors and pere argument and then gives a meh reason to vote pere (667.
I originally disliked more players on the wagon but I been rethinking them.
I will point out, firstly, your point on Dave is weak considering Dave's playstyle. Seriously, go do research and come back and talk to me on that one. Also, Dave in isolation is reading really townish to me right now, you're not getting any of that?
I also don't see it on Muffin unless he's super buddying me - because he did choose to go into that dustup with GM about me also, which, at least suggests he's willing to take a lead stance on a case if he's so inclined even if he's scum in this game.
I mildly see the point on Script - but, meh, I townread him myself, and even if you don't 1-2 questionable votes hardly a bad wagon makes at this wagon size.
In post 1929, Garmr wrote:3 they were similar at the start (not the same) but they steered into different directions. I don't agree with some of his reads/reactions but I can see how he got there with the way he thinks.
This is frustratingly vague.
I would actually say in the early game he was doing almost anything *but* offering reads and thoughts.
I would also say that, since moving away from me, he hasn't done anything either.
In fact - besies his press on me, i would dare say his ISO barely has anything one could call scumhunting in it.
And I have people calling him town or agreeing with his thoughts.
Do you think I'm crazy to have those beliefs? Like, specifically, that besides comments about me Pere has done nothing this game?
In post 1705, PeregrineV wrote:In post 1647, AxleGreaser wrote:@PereVHi.
It is important you read the words that I say in this post and respond to this post.
Do not try and explain your case/points against Thor to me, I read that already.
Your are a towny, you are trying to work the game out(or pretending to)
(ooo spooky colours)
What is your current belief in how likely this game is to be multiball?
Why?
I don't think it's 2 scumteams.
I think there is an SK.
In post 1955, T S O wrote:Fucking fine.
Vote: PeregrineV
If that'll get you off my fucking back, great.
In post 1919, Thor665 wrote:@Axle - oh, and as far as the compare contrast thing. If you're using weak examples (as I think you are) and aren't going to show all of them in one fell swoop..what do you think the endgame point of the exercise is? I'll still do it on TSO, but I want you to state that you have a goal and maybe even clue me in enough on the goal so I can obligate you to do it once you get the answer. I am too lazy to do busy work for the sake of busy work.
In post 1959, Garmr wrote:1. Not really
In post 1959, Garmr wrote:2. Your original vote on pere was weaksauce -_- annoyance out the way
In post 1959, Garmr wrote:dave-I misread the whole goodmorning thing as well which was a bigger factor as why I scum read him but you have to admit the way he handled you and pere was a bad jump onto it. After he does a lot of theory talk about if pere is scum that there must be scum in the neighborhoods goes in depth about it. That really isn't solid reasoning.
In post 1959, Garmr wrote:script-was my weaker reads of the three and the only one you agreed slightly intreasting.
In post 1959, Garmr wrote:muffin- I stick to my points on this and that dustop that involves "explain your read,Is that the best,there's a better vote if that's all,link some some shit" yep real riviting stuff from muffin.
In post 1959, Garmr wrote:3.
From my view point his got caught up with your wall. But the fact his recent post his brought up egg,muffin and scriptian so it's not all about you and I think his done a little. But the way you act around him got him caught up on you not sure if you realize you have that effect sometimes (remember you and slandaar in the game we were a scum team you didn't even mean for that wall to happen.)
In post 1959, Garmr wrote:It became a way to debate your statistic into a surefire thing. I don't understand this transtion.
In post 1952, T S O wrote:Pressuring a greater scumread, for one.
In post 1880, T S O wrote:I haven't provided -any- resistance to answering when the question is asked by anyone but you (case in point: when I was asked, I've started to make it) because I have no interest in wasting my time posting information no-one wants except you, when you'll just twist whatever I say into me being scum.
In post 1880, T S O wrote:I haven't provided -any- resistance to answering when the question is asked by anyone but you (case in point: when I was asked, I've started to make it) because I have no interest in wasting my time postingexcept you, when you'll just twist whatever I say into me being scum.information no-one wants
In post 1882, Slandaar wrote:TSO can you actually post in one place why you think/thought Aneninen is scum please?
In post 1835, T S O wrote:the case is coming, btw, surely but very slowly.
In post 1956, T S O wrote:i'm out.
In post 1961, Aneninen wrote:
Quoting a #180-ish post then jumping to #1700 so as to comment on the TSO-Nero interaction?
In post 1961, Aneninen wrote:
As if there had been nothing more interesting. Pretty of nulls next. 1860 is an evasion plus a speculation (which feels to include "inside information" – that's just an intuition, though).
In post 1961, Aneninen wrote:
The 1917, vote for GoodMorning is terrible, as for its reasoning. Everyone: check that out, also the #s of the posts!!!
In post 1961, Aneninen wrote:
(By the way, did he want to derail the PeregrineV wagon in 1932? We should remember that later!)
In post 1943, Thor665 wrote:
You find him colorful in this game? Becase the only color he showed, in my opinion, was when I forced him to engage me. Other than that he has very much struck me as a sit back and do nothing player.
In post 1943, Thor665 wrote:
You're falling into his trap here.
It doesn't matter whether or not he believes games are or are not likely to be multiball.
The question is - would he find it *scummy* that I thought it was likely. (or, more specifically, a safe presumption)
Why did he think *that* was scummy.
It doesn't matter whether or not he thought it was or wasn't likely, it mattered that he called it scummy to think otherwise.
In post 1943, Thor665 wrote:
Okay.
Why should he think this? (also, I think you should care - why don't you? We're talking about a read on pere here, I would think that aspect would matter, yeah?)
In post 1965, Slandaar wrote:
I read nearly 2000 posts in 2 days what did you expect me to do? write a bunch of walls aswell? do you want players who are caught up and know whats going on or ones who write a wall take 5 hours to read 10 pages and never catch up?
In post 1965, Slandaar wrote:
In post 1961, Aneninen wrote:
Quoting a #180-ish post then jumping to #1700 so as to comment on the TSO-Nero interaction?
Yes? I read the recent couple pages while reading the rest? What is the issue with that?
In post 1965, Slandaar wrote:
In post 1961, Aneninen wrote:
As if there had been nothing more interesting. Pretty of nulls next. 1860 is an evasion plus a speculation (which feels to include "inside information" – that's just an intuition, though).
That isn't my post.
In post 1965, Slandaar wrote:
In post 1961, Aneninen wrote:
The 1917, vote for GoodMorning is terrible, as for its reasoning. Everyone: check that out, also the #s of the posts!!!
Whats terrible about it?
In post 1917, Slandaar wrote:I think Thor and PV are both town.
Lets lynch someone else.
Vote: GoodMorning
GM is good as scum so she hasn't made any huge mistakes or slips and this makes it hard to make an argument against her but her tone doesn't feel right and she never seems to have much point to what she says.
But seriously;The way she acted during Csareo's time was incredibly scummy.She asked him multitudes of questions and argued lots of what he said becauseit was easy.It looks good when you argue with someone like Csareo because you will always win and thus come out looking good but at the same time she wasn't pushing the wagon or really doing anything with the questions she asked or points she disputed.You can see this later where she never again questions anyone to such an extent, take Thor she never questions him.
In post 1965, Slandaar wrote:
In post 1961, Aneninen wrote:
(By the way, did he want to derail the PeregrineV wagon in 1932? We should remember that later!)
Yep I want to derail PV wagon.
In post 1968, Slandaar wrote:I find it believable that if you have a certain experience with games going a certain way you would think others with similar experience levels would think similarly, thus you not doing so when he thinks you would think similar to him appears scummy to him.
In post 1917, Slandaar wrote:...
GM thinks rolefishing is scummy, now think about this response;
In post 1802, goodmorning wrote:It's terribly transparent,trying to lynch a PR.trying to rolefish.Your answer is too simple- it doesn't take consequences into account.
GM is scum. She is thinking on different levels when it suits her.
The End.
In post 1971, Thor665 wrote:But it didn't in that way.
He said it was scummy if there were two scum teams. But if there was one scum team it would not be scummy.