Mini 451 - Totally Awesome Mafia, Game Over

[NabakovNabakov]

^^^
Or maybe it's just because he called you a dork?



The dude really only has 4 posts in this thread (1 per page) and the past couple, oddly, have dealt with lurking (as well as proving how much better he is than us).

Lowell, it is ill advised to be propelling stones when your house appears to be constructed of a quite delicate material.

[NabakovNabakov]

I guess you'll just have to page back to know where "^^^" is pointing to.

I've been on top of the past 3 pages and it's starting to creep me out.

[CrashTextDummie]

Mod:

Could we have a prod on Hjallti and CrashTextDummie?
They both random-voted Nekka-Lucifer (their only post), and it would be nice to see if they want their votes to stick.

I didn't vote randomly.

[Stewie]

Now, does this set of anyone else's scumdar? Especially after Nabokov has already reiterated how bad it is to vote absentees. My vote is already on Lowell, so

FoS Lowell

for attacking me with a completely bottomless argument.

The fact that Nabokov said something doesn't make it true. Lurker bandwagons are not "bad." I find them to be beneficial, particularly early in the game.

[Nekka-Lucifer]

Mod:

Could we have a prod on Hjallti and CrashTextDummie?
They both random-voted Nekka-Lucifer (their only post), and it would be nice to see if they want their votes to stick.

I didn't vote randomly.

If you didn't vote randomly, what was your suspicion of me in the first place...

Good moring everyone.

Vote: Nekka-Lucifer

This seems scummish so I think I'll

vote: CrashTextDummie

Not only that, he seems to have been reading but not posting (lurker perhaps) I'm not THAT familiar with what scum notifications are but I feel this is quite a strong one... Either that or it was just a mispost

[Nekka-Lucifer]

Oops, first I will

Unvote: A Papaya

and then

Vote: CrashTextDummie

[Aimee]

Nekka, you have been vote-hoping quite a lot. Is there any major reason for moving your vote around so much?

[Nekka-Lucifer]

It's just I'm really confused... and I talk alot because I'm on alot

[Hjallti]

@ Off the mark [46]
I'm not online in weekends and the last weekend included monday. That's ahy you heard nothing. By the way you were allready complaining on saturday????

[Hjallti]

unvote:

FoS: Nekka anyhow, but I want to evaluate more carefully. I'll post again tomorrow morning normally.

I think it is no good for the game and for town that some people allready complain for being off a weekend...

[Off the Mark]

@hjallti

Sorry, I know it wasn't much real world time, but you and CTD were the only ones that hadn't contributed to the thread since your opening votes. My vote's no longer on you, if that matters.

@everyone

CTD and hjallti still aren't contributing much to the thread, though. Hopefully we'll get some input this morning. N-L is still looking scummy to me, especially his last few posts, but he is so newbish it could just be that. I don't think I'd be comfortable with a N-L lynch at this point, but we should still maintain the pressure to see what comes of it.

Just saw hjallti's post - wanting people to contribute to the game is GOOD, not BAD. This reads to me that he simply does not like being called out for lurking.

FOS: Hjallti

[~N9V~]

Unvote Vote Nekka

Stop vote hopping. It's distracting to the town, and in most cases, unhelpful.

[PJ.]

He is exempt because he can not play on weekends. I neglected to tell everyone and feven forgot myself. I urge players to please disregard the bottom OTM's last post

~N9V~ - 2(Aimee, Bobbyplump,)
Lowell - 1(The Highland Sage)
Nekka-Lucifer - 4(Stewie, Off The Mark, crashtextdummie, ~N9V~)
The Highland Sage - 1(Lowell)
crashtextdummie - 1(Nekka-Lucifer)

Not Voting - (A Papaya, NabakovNabakov, Hjallti)


With 12 alive, it takes

7

to lynch.

[Off the Mark]

OK, interesting mod commentary there. I still do not like the fact that Hjallti got defensive about being called out. Seems to me a pro-town player would just say, "I can't post on weekends" without adding the extraneous garbage about how it is "no good for the game and for the town" for people to ask others to contribute.

Also, he unvotes N-L and changes it to an FOS. This could easily be two scum here. He initially "random" voted N-L to create distance, but when pressure mounted he backed off his vote to "reevaluate". I'm very interested to see what Hjallti has to say later today or tomorrow. I wouldn't bet on this 2-scum scenario being true quite yet, I'm just saying it is possible.

[Aimee]

Unvote Vote Nekka

Stop vote hopping. It's distracting to the town, and in most cases, unhelpful.

FoS: N9V

, this makes me uneasy. I mentioned it a few posts above, and it seems you are merely copying the point I made, without adding your own ideas. That is also "unhelpful".

[Off the Mark]

@Nekka-Lucifer

You never responded to my questions in post 91. You posted in post 95 and completely ignored my questions. Why?

[Nekka-Lucifer]

Ohh sorry, I was posting it, but then I went to bed and closed it without sending...

If I was scum, then why would other scums vote me

Please clarify: who are the other scum who are voting for you? And you know this how??? You seem to think A Papaya is scum. Other than his vote for you, what makes you believe this?

I don't know who the other scums are... Hypethetically at least 1 of em is scum...
I don't know who scum are...
I don't like his reasons, worst time for me to be posting atm... I have my reasons? I dunno, I forgot now...

[Aimee]

Nekka, you use too much WIFOM. Stop, please.

[Off the Mark]

I really don't know what to make of Nekka's last post. (116) If he really is scum, then that is just a sad, sorry excuse of a post. Basically, it is so scummy, it makes me think he's townie, because I haven't seen anything to make me think he's clever enough to pull off the "too scummy" bluff. Now I am using WIFOM, I know, so at this point, I really don't know what to do - I almost want to unvote him, but I don't see anyone else worthy of a vote at this point. I'm going to wait for others to evaluate before I do anything, but now I am less sure of Nekka's scumminess (ironically because he is too scummy)

The only way he really is scum is that he has simply given up and is posting absolute crap.

[Off the Mark]

This is another post that looks incredibly scummy:

Good moring everyone.

Vote: Nekka-Lucifer

This seems scummish so I think I'll

vote: CrashTextDummie

Not only that, he seems to have been reading but not posting (lurker perhaps) I'm not THAT familiar with what scum notifications are but I feel this is quite a strong one... Either that or it was just a mispost

How does a vote and a "good morning" look scummy? How is that a "strong" scumtell? I think I was overthinking this with my WIFOM argument in my last post. If it stinks like a skunk, it's probably a skunk.

I especially don't like the phrasing of "so I think I'll vote" like he's just tossing votes around willy nilly.

[NabakovNabakov]

@OTM: I think the scumminess N-L was referring to in that post was this:

Mod:

Could we have a prod on Hjallti and CrashTextDummie?
They both random-voted Nekka-Lucifer (their only post), and it would be nice to see if they want their votes to stick.

I didn't vote randomly.

He was just emphasizing the fact that CTD's vote was with no evidence and no justification, yet he says it wasn't random.

The fact that Nabokov said something doesn't make it true.

Excuse me, but I beg to differ.

[~N9V~]

Sorry Aims... but there isn't much I can add to vote hopping charges.

[The Highland Sage]

I think I'm going to have to agree with OtM here in that, by appearing so scummy, N-L seems to be protown. But, given his behavior, it seems that he is definately the scummiest right now, and there really isn't reason to suspect anyone else. Therefore,

Unvote

Also I think Nabakov was right, I only put my vote on lowell because he called me a dork. He still does look like a hipoctite with his posts about lurking, while he himself appears lurker. I'm very suspicious of him still.

[A Papaya]

Also, I really hate his vote hopping. It's like he hopes that he'll vote for someone who responds by acting scummy and then he'll be saved.

So for now, since he is acting the scummiest, re

Vote: N-L

[Stewie]

Sorry Aims... but there isn't much I can add to vote hopping charges.

Not to mention that you kinda needed to make that post to change your vote. It was a helpful post in the sense that you revoted.

Excuse me, but I beg to differ.

Are you saying that lurker wagons are bad, or that you saying something makes it true? I know you are wrong about the former, and also the latter by extension, but I was wondering.