Mafia 64: The New "C9" - Game over!

[Albert B. Rampage]

@Albert: Well, the only game you saw me in, I was scum, and in a position to speed lynch (which I took.)

Also, JDodge and SV being good mafia players is probably why they were taken out. They could be big threats to the mafia, right?

Yes that is correct, you are right on both points.

[petroleumjelly]

Official Day One Vote Count: #1

Albert B. Rampage – 3 – HackerHuck, Battle Mage, Johhan

Johhan – 2 – Albert B. Rampage, Nik Zero

Glork – 1 – Guardian
Jack – 1 – beanbagboy

With

18

alive, it takes

10

to lynch!

Not Voting – 11 – ~N9V~, Billy Twilight, Coron, Glork, Haut Boy, HungryJoe, Jack, MrBuddyLee, Shteven, The Central Scrutinizer, Yogurt Bandit

[HungryJoe]

Yeah, I kinda do. I don't know if that's good or not, and I guess it doesn't really matter on day 1. =) But still!

[beanbagboy]

Meh, all votes are random now. If you have a reason for it, all the better.

Also, your votes give others information, so as a rule voting is a good thing (in random voting)

Just some thoughts, I don't know how experienced you are, so I can't tell if that's a newbie mistake or a strategy.

No biggie, though.

[Glork]

Vote: MBL

You know better than to talk about "odd kill choices." Bad boy. Bad, bad, bad boy.

[beanbagboy]

@MBL: How was SV an "odd" kill choice?

@Glrok: Why is MBL a bad boy?

[Albert B. Rampage]

@Glrok: Why is MBL a bad boy?

That sounded kinky.

[beanbagboy]

LOL
EW

[Glork]

MBL seems to want to begin the often-fruitless process of "nightkill choice speculation." The only ones among us who could have any legitimate insight into the scums' kills would be the scums themselves. MBL is experienced enough to know by now that talking about N1 kills (especially in a night-start game) is rarely (if ever) useful.

I'd like MBL to answer BBB's question only because I'm curious myself to know why exactly MBL would label a spectrumvoid kill as "odd." But for the most part, I want to nip this "speculation on why so-and-so was killed" issue in the bud. Simply put, we will not be able to discern anything at all from who was killed. And any insinuations that X might be scum because Y died will without a doubt get a vote from me.

[HungryJoe]

Sorry about this fellas, but I'm gonna be gone probably without internet access until Monday night/Tuesday morning. I'll talk to ya folks then, and I'll drop in if I have the chance. =)

[Guardian]

unvote vote: MBL

Willing to join a Glork wagon ^_^.
If you're wrong Glork, you're public enemy #1 because I know that you are able to psychically determine on command who is scum without effort .

[Shteven]

I must say I'm suprised how quickly this game's taken off. Maybe it's been too long since I played, and I just don't remember.

I'm not up to reading the thread carefully, so I'm just checking in, and I'll post again tommorow.

[Haut Boy]

Pardon me if I'm missing a lack of seriousness (as it is nearing 3:00 AM in my part of the world), but why are we depending on Glork when for all we know he could actually be scum~♥ I know there's that shiny "Paragon of Mafia Hunters" award, but really...

I believe it the NKs were done manually. The deadline to get night actions in was 2 hours, but the deaths were reported 43 minutes after.

Then why did you ask if it was randomized or not?

[Battle Mage]

i agree with Haut Boy. ive seen this happen before in other games, and Glork-scum is allowed free reign to do as he pleases till about day 4 or 5.
in future, dont class 'Glork must be right' as a reason to vote for somebody. such blind following is worthy of my vote.
BM

Pardon me if I'm missing a lack of seriousness (as it is nearing 3:00 AM in my part of the world), but why are we depending on Glork when for all we know he could actually be scum~♥ I know there's that shiny "Paragon of Mafia Hunters" award, but really...

I believe it the NKs were done manually. The deadline to get night actions in was 2 hours, but the deaths were reported 43 minutes after.

Then why did you ask if it was randomized or not?

[Jack]

I don't like albert's reason for voting johhan.

Vote:Albert

[MrBuddyLee]

Willing to join a Glork wagon ^_^.
If you're wrong Glork, you're public enemy #1

Glork is innocuously wrong, but clearly this is worse.

unvote, vote: Guardian

[Guardian]

Mmm, it's not about the award, it's about him nailing scum in like 5 consecutive games I hosted in scumchat. And he didn't only completely find the scum, he didn't miss once, if he misses, he's likely scum imo.

No pressure Glork.

Btw, nice OMGUS vote MBL .

I am tempted to put my vote back on Glork though, as I demanded that he find all five scum and he only attempted to find one. Tsk tsk Glork.

Glork, why do you claim that trying to derive some information from the scum kills is worthless? It seems like a perfectly valid pursuit to me.

I would unvote, because up to this point in the game my posts have been made not without some humor and sarcasm, but MBL's counter vote is making me suspicious.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Pardon me if I'm missing a lack of seriousness (as it is nearing 3:00 AM in my part of the world), but why are we depending on Glork when for all we know he could actually be scum~♥ I know there's that shiny "Paragon of Mafia Hunters" award, but really...

I believe it the NKs were done manually. The deadline to get night actions in was 2 hours, but the deaths were reported 43 minutes after.

Then why did you ask if it was randomized or not?

I gave it some thought, re-read the post, looked at the time, then posted my thoughts on the subject.

It would make sense for the post to come exactly 2 hours later if they were randomized.

[Glork]

Willing to join a Glork wagon ^_^.
If you're wrong Glork, you're public enemy #1

Glork is innocuously wrong, but clearly this is worse.

unvote, vote: Guardian

...because Guardian is clearly being 100% serious.

Also, your failure to respond to BeanBagBoy has been noted.

[Guardian]

In seriousness:

Glork, why do you claim that trying to derive some information from the scum kills is worthless? It seems like a perfectly valid pursuit to me.

[Glork]

Because the vast majority of the time, D1 speculation on N1 kills is either completely inconclusive or completely wrong. I have seen scums try to speculate on why (or what kind of player) would kill Player X simply to mislead the town. It's a known scumtell.

[Battle Mage]

thats ridiculous logic. yes, such a record indicates that Glork is a good player, but i dont think that is in question here. we are trying to work out whether people are scum or town. Following someone blindly who is so far from being confirmed town is very scummy.
I mean, not only does Glorks previous success have no bearing on his affiliation here, the fact he succeeded in SCUMCHAT games, is VERY different to games like this. The fact that you expect us to believe the BS that if Glork is wrong, Glork=scum, is not only a complete 180 spin, but also a really foolish comment to make. I seriously wish you were joking, but unfortunately i dont think you were.

Unvote, Vote: Guardian

Mmm, it's not about the award, it's about him nailing scum in like 5 consecutive games I hosted in scumchat. And he didn't only completely find the scum, he didn't miss once, if he misses, he's likely scum imo.

No pressure Glork.

Btw, nice OMGUS vote MBL .

I am tempted to put my vote back on Glork though, as I demanded that he find all five scum and he only attempted to find one. Tsk tsk Glork.

Glork, why do you claim that trying to derive some information from the scum kills is worthless? It seems like a perfectly valid pursuit to me.

I would unvote, because up to this point in the game my posts have been made not without some humor and sarcasm, but MBL's counter vote is making me suspicious.

[Glork]

GUARDIAN IS GOOFING AROUND BECAUSE THIS IS THE EARLY/RANDOM STAGE OF THE GAME. PLEASE GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD, BATTLE MAGE.

Thank you. That is all.

[Battle Mage]

Glork, posting in large red font, doesnt make the crap you are saying any more viable....
Its pretty obvious that the aspect of Guardians comments i was referring to, was far from a joke. in fact, if he was joking id be even more concerned, as there would be even less reason to defend you so...

[Glork]

You're kidding, right? You mean you think that Guardian actually believes that I am the perfect mafia player and that I know all of the scums' identities without everyone even having posted yet? You think that language like "I demanded that he find all five scum" and "Tsk tsk Glork" is "far from a joke"?




Please stop talking, BM. You're just making yourself look like a fool.