Page 10 of 14
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:27 am
by Zachrulez
In post 224, chamber wrote: In post 223, Zachrulez wrote:(A player can link the topic, but it's not possible for other parties to see it without my ok.)
In post 95, chamber wrote:at the moment all admins can see all PTs, and when I'm not in games I'll likely also periodically be in that group to make sure everything's working right and not being abused.
I felt the need to reiterate this point.
Is it going to stay that way? Also does a list mod qualify as an admin?
Most of my concern on that front is if admins/list mods are also players.
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:39 am
by zoraster
no. listmods cannot see all PTs.
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:46 am
by RedCoyote
Who'd have thought this thread would create such controversy!
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:48 am
by quadz08
In post 225, Zachrulez wrote:Most of my concern on that front is if admins/list mods are also players.
Admins are red names (Kison, Mith, Flay).
Any admin who decides they want to play in a game will have their full PT access removed while they are playing.
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:23 am
by chamber
There are others(from long ago mostly). The group is public.
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:52 pm
by Mr. Flay
http://forum.mafiascum.net/memberlist.php?mode=leaders
To be clear, the only other two members are jeep and MeMe, both long retired.
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:58 pm
by Burning_Earth
Isn't mith also gone?
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:12 pm
by SleepyKrew
mith is always here
like Cabd but with permissions
he's always watching
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:12 pm
by Burning_Earth
cabd plays too!
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:38 pm
by tn5421
You need to re-read
232 Burning_Earth.
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 9:48 am
by chamber
Jeep and Meme are gone-gone. Mith may have periods of inactivity, but he still owns this site and is still around more than not I'd say.
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 8:20 pm
by N
In post 195, RedCoyote wrote:
I often fantasize how wonderful life would be with the likes of N and SleepyKrew following me around with their snarky observations and delectable wit.
Mafiascum. I tell people: come for the Mafia; stay for N & SK.
Chiffarobe: busted.
Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 6:35 pm
by Nero Cain
Why do I see private topics that I was never apart of?
Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 6:38 pm
by Burning_Earth
They can become public after games end.
You have a problem if you're seeing ongoing game ones tho
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 4:26 am
by Kdub
Do posts in private topics get counted in a player's post count when looking at their profile?
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 4:34 am
by Xalxe
In post 239, Kdub wrote:Do posts in private topics get counted in a player's post count when looking at their profile?
Don't believe they do anymore, no.
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 9:34 pm
by AGar
Something worth noting at the moment - currently in ego search they do not have "PRIVATE TOPIC" in front of them. Not sure if this was a known thing or not, tried to search the thread for any mention of it.
Posted: Thu May 08, 2014 2:49 pm
by chamber
Known by me.
Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 8:39 am
by AGar
Feature, not a bug? (Mostly just curious, as I know there has been a huge push to keep the PTs strongly distinguished from the rest of the topics onsite)
Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 9:02 am
by chamber
Lazyness.
Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 9:13 am
by mastin2
Could we make it possible to edit and/or delete posts in PTs like QTs?
That's something that we always could do in QTs, anyway. Or maybe give the PT creator the option of allowing/disallowing it.
I ask because this is something fairly important. If you posted something in the wrong QT, it could potentially compromise one or two games, but there was the ability to delete the message. (Both by yourself or if necessary the topic creator.)
If you post something in the wrong PT, right now, you have to rely on the PT creator in order to delete it, and don't have that power yourself. Which can lead to potentially compromising a game or two.
Posted: Tue May 13, 2014 10:36 am
by zoraster
i would be fine with this, particularly the "OP decides whether to allow editing or not" part.
Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 7:14 pm
by chamber
Editing permissions are decided at the forum level. It would be very little work to turn them on for all PTs, but then, I don't see why someone should be allowed to edit posts in PTs more than they should be allowed to in a mafia game.
I have no intentions of doing the coding required to add topic level editing permissions.
Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 9:19 pm
by RichardGHP
In post 247, chamber wrote:Editing permissions are decided at the forum level. It would be very little work to turn them on for all PTs, but then, I don't see why someone should be allowed to edit posts in PTs more than they should be allowed to in a mafia game.
Because a mafia game is entirely public information. Prohibition of editing in QT's has never, to my knowledge, been standard.
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 3:00 am
by zoraster
In post 247, chamber wrote:Editing permissions are decided at the forum level. It would be very little work to turn them on for all PTs, but then, I don't see why someone should be allowed to edit posts in PTs more than they should be allowed to in a mafia game.
I have no intentions of doing the coding required to add topic level editing permissions.
Really the time it's annoying is for review threads, particularly the normal review threads where the OP isn't the primary person doing the setup. But a minor concern.