Mafia 60: Face-to-Face - Game over!

Adele · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:20 am

vote: AndrewS

. A vote for no lynch is a vote for scum power.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:29 pm

First Vote Count of the Game!

Thesp: 4 (Patrick, CES, Fritzler, Zindaras)
Cogito Ergo Sum: 3 (MrBuddyLee, ChannelDelibird, Glork)
AndrewS: 2 (Thesp, Adele)
MgM: 1 (spectrumvoid)

Not voting: IH*, MgM*, Nightfall, AndrewS

8 to lynch!

MrBuddyLee · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:19 pm

Patrick is town, Glork's scum. It's fairly obvious already.

spectrumvoid · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:20 pm

A question: AndrewS are you a newbie?

MrBuddyLee · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:24 pm

unvote, vote: Glork

Patrick · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:54 am

MBL wrote:Patrick is town, Glork's scum. It's fairly obvious already.

:Goodposting obv:
AndrewS is leet right? I don't think his suggestion makes it more likely he's scum. I doubt he would seriously expect to convince us all to go no lynch, especially when we don't even have an even number.

AndrewS · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:36 am

I'm not a newbie. I was just getting frustrated with the fact that it had been 2 full days and we were no closer to finding anything out than normal. Yes, I understand that random votes are a normal part of the game, but I also understand that it occurs until someone slips up and says something stupid. In an invitational, I assumed that nobody would be so stupid to do such. Apparently I was wrong.

spectrumvoid · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:46 am

Interesting. I'll can the usual 'why we don't do no-lynch' speech I give to newbies (sorry, a bit too many newbie games at the present...)

unvote, vote Glork

Glork · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:06 am

Patrick wrote:
MBL wrote:Patrick is town, Glork's scum. It's fairly obvious already.
:Goodposting obv:

If you agree with MBL's assessment of the game thus far, why are you not voting me?

Thesp · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:26 am

Thesp wrote:I don't think his suggestion makes it more likely he's scum.

Interesting. The last time I made that suggestion about someone who had experience and was suggesting No Lynch, I was wrong. My vote's been justified.

Patrick · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:31 am

Glork wrote:If you agree with MBL's assessment of the game thus far, why are you not voting me?

Any post that says I'm town is a goodposting

I don't have any reason to suspect you.

Glork · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:18 am

MrBuddyLee wrote:Glork's scum. It's fairly obvious already.

Alright, I'll bite.

Why am I scum?

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:16 am

Well, unless Stoofer went crazy with role assignment, chance is responsible, Glrok.

Adele · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:18 am

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Well, unless Stoofer went crazy with role assignment, chance is responsible, Glrok.

:lolposting:

Zindaras · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:19 am

Adele wrote:
Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Well, unless Stoofer went crazy with role assignment, chance is responsible, Glrok.
:lolposting:

/agree.

Ether · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:43 pm

AndrewS wrote:I was just getting frustrated with the fact that it had been 2 full days and we were no closer to finding anything out than normal. Yes, I understand that random votes are a normal part of the game, but I also understand that it occurs until someone slips up and says something stupid. In an invitational, I assumed that nobody would be so stupid to do such. Apparently I was wrong.

vote: AndrewS

I don't really care about a no-lynch vote; it's too blatant for me to care particularly. That it seems you weren't

expecting

FoSes for it concerns me a bit more. Er, I'm confused about that post I just quoted.

(On a fluffy note, let's see what

I

can spark.

Damn

I'm face-to-face!)

Fritzler · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:41 pm

andrew is not the play

spectrumvoid · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:26 pm

Adele · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:49 am

Who is?

Glork · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:00 am

Adele wrote:Who is?

Pretty sure CES fits the description of "the play."

Adele · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:01 am

I was asking Fritz, though.

AndrewS · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:18 am

Alright, alright...Guess I'll explain. I voted no lynch and said that in order to get peoples' reactions. Many times, by doing or saying something unexpected, you can learn a lot from simple reactions...And while I haven't gotten anything concrete from it, I do believe that I have sort of a feel for who to watch for. Not enough for a vote, mind you, just sort of a feeling for it.

Glork · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:23 am

Adele wrote:I was asking Fritz, though.

And I'm answering anyway.

However, AndrewS is once again looking like a brilliant alternative.

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:26 am

I'm not convinced by that explanation. I also feel that if you feel you learned something from it, telling the town who you feel made a scummy reaction to your post would help your position (if it's justified, of course).

FoS: AndrewS

Adele · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:31 am

It's very easy to try a scummy gambit, get called up on it, and protest "I only said something scummy to see if there were any scummy reactions to it!" - I can understand the tactic, but couldn't youi have thought of something controversial to say that wouldn't've hurt the town if we'd taken you up on it?