Actually, now that I look back at things, there's a serious misrepresentation that I can't let go unnoted.
Let's go back and look at what I said:
Glork wrote:Make no mistake about it, though. Had you been at Lynch -1 without me on the wagon, I would have hammered. I've never done something *that* ridiculous before. I think it'd be kinda fun to do it to someone. I think it'd be absolutely f***ing hilarious. And I will do it before I retire from Mafia games altogether.
What does this post say?
I (Glork) would have hammered you.
I (Glork) think that it would be fun/hilarious.
What did you say?
MrBuddyLee wrote:Yeah, you even said yourself there's a "cool factor" involved and it'd be a point of pride to someday hammer someone before page 3. Significantly likely, but thanks to a few timely unvotes temptation was removed and it didn't happen.
You take my opinion (I would hammer, think it's cool, blahblah) and try to present it as the standard or normal opinion/attitude. Because *I*, someone
already on your wagon
said I would have hammered, you say that it is "significantly likely" that
somebody else
would have hammered.
As I've said before: The people I consider most likely to hammer were all already on your wagon. If you can make a case that somebody
not already on your wagon
would have hammered you, then you can say it was "significantly likely" that you would have been hammered.
"Glork would hammer, since he thinks it's cool" does not mean "Somebody else would have hammered because they thought it was cool."
Strong FoS: MBL
Do you have a real reson for voting me? Or do you just plan on misrepresenting me and making up reasons to "suspect" me, hoping it'll stick somehow?
) I wouldn't have expected to see you hammer, but apparently feel the same way as me.