Oh, right.Pooky wrote:4 votes and that's all ur giving us?
OMG 'IM NOT A SUCM DNO'T LINCH ME PLZ.
what would you rather have hapen if there was no bandwagon?PBuG wrote:Possibly he didn't know it was vote 3.Adele wrote:Besides, is it really that suspicious to be cautious about placing the third vote quickly? I felt awkward doing it too... although, if lostprophet feltsonervy, why do it at all?
Unvote, vote: Fritzlerfor placing vote 4,FomS: Pooky and ibbyfor votes 2 and 3
How about actual discussion before a sudden bandwagon?Fritzler wrote:what would you rather have hapen if there was no bandwagon?PBuG wrote:Possibly he didn't know it was vote 3.Adele wrote:Besides, is it really that suspicious to be cautious about placing the third vote quickly? I felt awkward doing it too... although, if lostprophet feltsonervy, why do it at all?
Unvote, vote: Fritzlerfor placing vote 4,FomS: Pooky and ibbyfor votes 2 and 3
a day kill?
I agree with you, that's why I find it strange that you vote without giving any reason.ibaesha wrote: PBug, you're looking kinda scummy with the whole Vote 1 person and FOS two others over a bandwagon. We need a bandwagon and a bandwagon with a reason is better than a bandwagon without one.
I'm not sure what you mean with this, can you explain??Fritzler wrote: what would you rather have hapen if there was no bandwagon?
a day kill?
What's even stranger is that I did it. I don't do that kind of thing very often. However, I did give a reason later. Did you miss that? I can understand finding it suspicious if I never gave a reason, but it's weird that you found it suspicious when I gave a reason not too long after, without prompting. Now, theCorsato wrote:I think ibaesha's vote is the most suspicious of the four, because she voted without giving any reason. And that's strange, even on day one.
I'm just saying, something on D1 has to happen to generate discussion. Would he rather there be a bandwagon, where discussion can build up before we lynch, or just a straight up day kill.Corsato wrote:I'm not sure what you mean with this, can you explain??Fritzler wrote: what would you rather have hapen if there was no bandwagon?
a day kill?
Nope, didn't miss it, that's the reason I'm not voting for you.ibaesha wrote: However, I did give a reason later. Did you miss that?
Why are you confused? My vote was random and it still is. I don't mind a bit of discussion, and I don't people starting it. What I do mind is blind bandwagonning and votes without reason or giving any form of explanation.Lostprophet wrote: I'm confused by your actions, Corsato. You seem to be questioning the wagon/Day 1 tactics, yet you neglected to remove your random vote, keeping me comfortably in the yellow. Oversight? Devil's advocacy?
ibaesha wrote:Why don't you want him lynched? Who do you want to lynch?
PBuG wrote:Well, I guess the others is just Corsato (I guess I thought there was more than one other person who had said something relating to you being suspicious). Like he said, you didn't immediately give a reason for your vote, and like you yourself said, you did something you don't normally do. And, either way, putting someone halfway to lynch as a useless page 2 bandwagon is suspicious. I'm considering going back to Fritzler, but I'm not sure.
At the moment, I do not prefer anyone. But that will change.ibaesha wrote: Why don't you want him lynched? Who do you want to lynch?
I do not want to specifically not lynch Lostprophet. Just as much as I do not want to specifically lynch PBug, or Pooky. At the moment I do not have a "favourite" candidate for lynching. It's just too early to tell, and I do not want to lynch someone "because it's day 1 and we have to do something". If we don't learn something from today we'll face the same problems tomorrow.ibaesha wrote: Why specifically would he not want to lynch LostProphet? He didn't say he wasn't ready for a lynch yet. He said he didn't want to lynch LP. Why?