Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 3:31 am
Town, for once.
Elaborate on this post.In post 1911, Syryana wrote:Moar votes on Desp!
BabySpice, stop making poetry and vote Desp.
Bacde, stop tunneling townies and vote Desp. That goes for the rest of you peeps on the Nacho wagon too.
Cephrir... eh, you do whatever you're doing, we'll lynch you tomorrow. Though if you want to be pro-town and bus your bud, we'd be all for that.
Thor, Slandaar, Disney hydra! Stop circle jerking and vote Desp!
Uh, that point was actually really validIn post 1921, Nachomamma8 wrote:Are you still pushing me because my Oversoul push was too aggressive?In post 1898, Red Ryu wrote:Back from V/LA, Thor is derping hard.
We need to stop distracting from the Nacho wagon.
BB convince me Thor is scum over dumb, I still remain that he is dumb town.
I'll click my ISO button to see where I left off.
Bacde you still my Bro?
Yes, still think you are scum. You tunneled him on a null tell and didn't have the mindset a townie would. I haven't read everything from where I left off but my vote and stance remains.In post 1921, Nachomamma8 wrote:Are you still pushing me because my Oversoul push was too aggressive?In post 1898, Red Ryu wrote:Back from V/LA, Thor is derping hard.
We need to stop distracting from the Nacho wagon.
BB convince me Thor is scum over dumb, I still remain that he is dumb town.
I'll click my ISO button to see where I left off.
Bacde you still my Bro?
Please note that though I am a lenient mod, this doesn't mean I'll allow you to get by with rules lawyering crap; I can deliver a more severe punishment if I deem it fitting, so don't assume you'll get a warning first and that you can get away with violating the rules--you can't.denotes a warning. Three is automatic replacement, as is two of the same offense.!
How does knowing that he was lying in any way make you town?In post 1931, Nachomamma8 wrote:How did I know he was lying as scum?
who has this premise to their argument?In post 1935, Nachomamma8 wrote:It doesn't, but the premise of the argument was that there was NO WAY I could know that Oversoul was lying, and I refused to believe that he was either telling the truth (true) or that he was lying town (false, and the reason I kept pushing him regardless was actually explained earlier in the thread).
Please stop interrupting.In post 972, Red Ryu wrote:But he tried to push OS on this as being scummy, there was no reason to consider him scummy for that action, he deliberately refused to think OS was town doing that lying or telling the truth.
Premise: There is NO WAY that you could have known that OS was lyingIn post 1935, Nachomamma8 wrote:It doesn't, but the premise of the argument was that there was NO WAY I could know that Oversoul was lying, and I refused to believe that he was either telling the truth (true) or that he was lying town (false, and the reason I kept pushing him regardless was actually explained earlier in the thread).
Premise: There was no reason to consider the fakeclaim as scummyIn post 1937, Nachomamma8 wrote:Please stop interrupting.In post 972, Red Ryu wrote:But he tried to push OS on this as being scummy, there was no reason to consider him scummy for that action, he deliberately refused to think OS was town doing that lying or telling the truth.
Your ability to misread what I say is pretty amazing. When I said you "completely changed what you said" I was referring to, for example, your stance on CTD, where you first said his case on DLG had absolutely nothing to do with your townread on him, but then later you said you were townreading him because of the way he was pushing his case as opposed to me. And can you show me where you called me out for not scumhunting? I don't remember that being a part of your case at any point. Or maybe where I "immediately adjusted my play?" Because that's new too.In post 1920, Nachomamma8 wrote:Yes, I did completely change what I said originally. What happens when I engage people is I attack them based on things that I don't like in their play, and then my read changes (either gets stronger or gets weaker) based on their responses. In this case, they got stronger. The situation of me calling you out for not scumhunting elsewhere is an observation that isn't necessarily indicative of you immediately being scum since you might just be a tunneley player, but the fact that you immediately adjusted your play after I called you out on that point told me I struck a chord.
still with the jabs at meIn post 1941, Nachomamma8 wrote:I am telling you to stop interrupting because I am trying to read Ryu, and I really would rather not deal with you when all that you've been posting for the longest time was scumscumscumscumscum. You were right that I was playing off. You were right that I was playing more passively than usual. Now I've stepped it the fuck up to a pretty dramatic point, but still with everything that I post it's scumscumscumscumscum. It shouldn't come to a surprise to you that I'm "attempting to undermine you" (actually, I'm trying the best I can to ignore you) because if you were in my position at this point you would have lost your patience a hell of a lot earlier than I have.
I never said that I was townreading him because of how he was pushing his case as opposed to you.In post 1942, Desperado wrote:Your ability to misread what I say is pretty amazing. When I said you "completely changed what you said" I was referring to, for example, your stance on CTD, where you first said his case on DLG had absolutely nothing to do with your townread on him, but then later you said you were townreading him because of the way he was pushing his case as opposed to me. And can you show me where you called me out for not scumhunting? I don't remember that being a part of your case at any point. Or maybe where I "immediately adjusted my play?" Because that's new too.
PEdit: This is you stepping it up? Continually misreading other people's posts and resorting to just making shit up when it suits you?
You're still doing this, by the way.In post 1668, Nachomamma8 wrote:You took one of the last two sentences that are not the essence of the case at all. You also took what was a very vague statement and railroaded it into "CTD's case on DLG", which, again, was not what I said.
That refers to you interacting almost exclusively with me.In post 1942, Desperado wrote:And can you show me where you called me out for not scumhunting?
That refers to the AA9 vote. Could you also explain your thought process behind that a bit more because I still don't understand it.In post 1942, Desperado wrote:Or maybe where I "immediately adjusted my play?" Because that's new too.
In post 1942, Desperado wrote:PEdit: This is you stepping it up? Continually misreading other people's posts and resorting to just making shit up when it suits you?
Who else have I misrepped? Where else have a made up shit where it's suited me?In post 1942, Desperado wrote:PEdit: This is you stepping it up? Continually misreading other people's posts and resorting to just making shit up when it suits you?
You've been pushing me for what, two weeks? I don't really think that you're suddenly going to have a revelation and be like "oh wait this is town nacho".In post 1944, Bacde wrote:What I want to know is, why you don't feel like the nacho I love?
I have never been interacting exclusively with you, either before or after my vote. There was a two day period (on a weekend IIRC) where I did not pust much (the 50/50 you and Cephrir pointed out earlier). And me moving my vote is an adjustment of my play? Go into more detail on that.In post 1640, Nachomamma8 wrote:It wasn't his case on DLG alone. He's pushed DLG in a way that's better than the way you pushed it. Reads are much more than one case. Stop asking these questions because they are scummy as hell.
And that's the period I was talking about because it just happened to be the time when I was initially pushing the case on you.In post 1947, Desperado wrote:I have never been interacting exclusively with you, either before or after my vote. There was a two day period (on a weekend IIRC) where I did not pust much (the 50/50 you and Cephrir pointed out earlier).
You interacting with me almost exclusively, then you voting ArcAngel and pushing her.In post 1947, Desperado wrote:And me moving my vote is an adjustment of my play? Go into more detail on that.