TT; Book 1: Bible Verse Mafia - Game over!
-
-
VisMaior Flip Out!
- Flip Out!
- Flip Out!
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: June 22, 2005
- Location: Budapest
-
-
Coron Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: November 19, 2004
-
-
VisMaior Flip Out!
- Flip Out!
- Flip Out!
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: June 22, 2005
- Location: Budapest
-
-
Fritzler More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: July 26, 2005
-
-
VisMaior Flip Out!
- Flip Out!
- Flip Out!
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: June 22, 2005
- Location: Budapest
-
-
VisMaior Flip Out!
- Flip Out!
- Flip Out!
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: June 22, 2005
- Location: Budapest
-
-
Cadmium Twentythreeth
- Twentythreeth
- Twentythreeth
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: May 1, 2002
- Location: Netherlands, the (Utrecht)
Vote count:
2 mith (LyingBrian, Mastermind of Sin)
1 armlx (Tyfo)
1 Mastermind of Sin (inHimshallibe)
2 Flying Dutchman (Commodore Amazing, PeaceBringer)
2 Coron (armlx, PookyTheMagicalBear)
4 VisMaior (Kerplunk, VitaminR, RoadBird, Fritzler)
1 Iammars (Flying Dutchman)
1 RoadBird (Coron)
1 no lynch (EnderX)
not voting (4): Fuldu, Iammars, mith, VisMaior
10 to lynch."OH MY GOD, Cadmium! I can make rye bread! You must be innocent, I'll do whatever you tell me!" exclaims Mackay excitedly. - Jeep, Mini Game 9-
-
Coron Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: November 19, 2004
-
-
VisMaior Flip Out!
- Flip Out!
- Flip Out!
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: June 22, 2005
- Location: Budapest
-
-
Kerplunk Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1272
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: Grûn, The Netherlands
So, you would like to vote for Roadbird but since you already voted Coron you can't vote for Roadbird because Coron has made as much sense as Roadbird this game.VisMaior wrote:My problem is that Coron has as much nonissueposts as roadbird.
Has your mafiagame lasted for only a few days or maybe it dragged on and on and on? Check the [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Records]Records page[/url] on the wiki to see if it is a record!-
-
Coron Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: November 19, 2004
-
-
RoadBird Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 86
- Joined: May 27, 2002
- Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
-
-
RoadBird Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 86
- Joined: May 27, 2002
- Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
And after night 1 God......euh......Mod decided to list a group of players. And he made the players clickable to see their posts. And Vismaior says:
Actually I have three issueposts. The first was #59. Ok it's only half an issue post. Only because Flying Dutchman didn't answer my question and I didn't make a scene about it, doesn't make it a nonissue post. And since when are votes nonissue? If voting is nonissue then lynching someone is too.VisMaior wrote:that does not say a lot. He has 0.
Coron why are you confusing our Mod? But beside that, you tried to push people into voting for me twice now. I like persistency in people but you make it sound completely logical that I am scum (although I still don't understand how a bibleverse can be scum). Why the eagerness all of a sudden?Flying Dutchman wrote:Dude, you should only be bolding stuff that is meant for the mod or really important and short (Like a FOS). Stop being silly and confusing to the mod and us like this.....
Anyway, I will follow any bandwagon on day one. I've been playing that way for years now and I might have missed something in the past year of not playing but I haven't seen better tactics. So Coron lets make a deal. But Coron you seem to like Mastermind of Sin's idea better
Yes lets all sit back and wait for a few months until Iammars gets bored and starts writing his 25-50 words mith ordered him to. Then we can all vote him for posting. Or better yet. Lets all vote no lynch. Well Coron your mathematical formulas seem to work. Tell me how much would scum gain from that?Mastermind of Sin wrote:why not just not vote at all yet???
Ow and don't forget to answer the question "Why the eagerness all of a sudden?""Roadbird you suck! You kill little kittens for fun! Die you evil Mafia scum, I'm attacking you! Run in fear!" -- Quercitron in Focused Mafia-
-
Coron Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: November 19, 2004
I'll give you #59 and this post as issue posts I suppose. Votes are not issue as long as there is no reasoning or feeling of strong suspicion behind them, being a blind follower is an issue, but only in that it makes you useless/scummy. Both your votes were followed by little actual backing or content and both were blindly following a bandwagon- perhaps attempting to be a faceless part of the mass.RoadBird wrote:And after night 1 God......euh......Mod decided to list a group of players. And he made the players clickable to see their posts. And Vismaior says:
Actually I have three issueposts. The first was #59. Ok it's only half an issue post. Only because Flying Dutchman didn't answer my question and I didn't make a scene about it, doesn't make it a nonissue post. And since when are votes nonissue? If voting is nonissue then lynching someone is too.VisMaior wrote:that does not say a lot. He has 0.
Hell if I know who the scum is, for all I know it's like Koran verses or something *shrug* all I know is my role as protown and that of the dead. SOMEONE has to be scum, am I correct? It is completely logical that you're scum, you're current play fits in perfectly with what I think of as scum doing.RoadBird wrote:But beside that, you tried to push people into voting for me twice now. I like persistency in people but you make it sound completely logical that I am scum (although I still don't understand how a bibleverse can be scum).
I saw something scummy out of you multiple times in your few posts.RoadBird wrote:Why the eagerness all of a sudden?
if you truely believe this then you are the devil and must be purged, day one(or any day) is not about blindly following people who have not brought up very serious points(like someone isn't modkilled and didn't follow their claimed restrictions, or a cop with a guilty result). Day 1 is about looking at how people post and then based on these you predict who is likely to be scum.RoadBird wrote:Anyway, I will follow any bandwagon on day one. I've been playing that way for years now and I might have missed something in the past year of not playing but I haven't seen better tactics.
a lot, but I don't see where the fuck this came from.RoadBird wrote:Yes lets all sit back and wait for a few months until Iammars gets bored and starts writing his 25-50 words mith ordered him to. Then we can all vote him for posting. Or better yet. Lets all vote no lynch. Well Coron your mathematical formulas seem to work. Tell me how much would scum gain from that?
done.RoadBird wrote:Ow and don't forget to answer the question "Why the eagerness all of a sudden?"-
-
mith Godfather
- Godfather
- Godfather
- Posts: 9267
- Joined: March 27, 2002
- Location: McKinney, TX
Yikes, it's been a while, I'd forgotten how incoherent Roadbird is...
I believe I already did explain why I asked you to do this. I did it to get you to talk, or at least to judge your reaction. It should be obvious why I want you to talk; look at your first two posts (a total of three words). I get a much better read on people when they're talking (and even better when they're arguing with me).Coron wrote:it has yet to be explained to me why I should make the world read 25 extra useless words, besides it appears to have found me a scum.
I've tried this little game before, though on that occasion I did it not to get people to talk, but to get a statement from players I know and can read reasonably well. A little answer to an admittedly somewhat silly question provides a great reference for later in the game. And, of course, the discussion thrives and bandwagons are born. Look how many people gave some sort of response here.
What I find interesting about your choice of response is not that you questioned and refused, but that that's all you did for the first few posts. Now, you're suddenly making longish posts. So was this legitimately not having anything to contribute, or were you lurking until you saw something to jump on?
I don't understand your initial jump on Roadbird at all. He is certainly not the only person to bandwagon jump.
(I don't understand why VisMaior chimed in with the nonissuepost thing, for that matter.)
All that said, I'm glad you got Roadbird posting, he makes less sense than you.
Warning: Using the user filter without looking at the context may cause mith to make fun of you, Crap Logic (tm), upset stomach, foot-in-mouth, and diarrhea.Roadbird wrote:
Yes lets all sit back and wait for a few months until Iammars gets bored and starts writing his 25-50 words mith ordered him to. Then we can all vote him for posting. Or better yet. Lets all vote no lynch. Well Coron your mathematical formulas seem to work. Tell me how much would scum gain from that?Mastermind of Sin wrote:why not just not vote at all yet???
Context:
EnderX wrote:Placeholder Vote: No Lynch
I'm present, I'm not seeing anyone acting excessively suspicious, (except maybe Mith's 'teacher'-mode with the essays...?) and I'm hoping not to get slammed down for lurking. My vote is only a temporary until someone either acts suspicious enough to earn it, or someone makes a good case for why I should vote for another particular individual. I'm not advocating a no-lynch, just keeping my vote from accidentally killing someone should the day move quickly.
Might I suggest that you haven't seen better tactics because you have been too busy not paying attention to the game during day 1?Roadbird wrote:Anyway, I will follow any bandwagon on day one. I've been playing that way for years now and I might have missed something in the past year of not playing but I haven't seen better tactics.
(And from the one game I remember playing with you in, you'll follow any bandwagon on day X and throw the game away because it's lynch or lose. The play style you are advocating is harmful to the town, and I am quite happy to lynch you just for that if I don't form any strong suspicions as we near the day's end. But I probably will, because I get involved instead of mindlessly bandwagoning hopping.)-
-
Coron Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: November 19, 2004
basically to spite you.mith wrote:
I believe I already did explain why I asked you to do this. I did it to get you to talk, or at least to judge your reaction. It should be obvious why I want you to talk; look at your first two posts (a total of three words).Coron wrote:it has yet to be explained to me why I should make the world read 25 extra useless words, besides it appears to have found me a scum.
*nod*mith wrote:I get a much better read on people when they're talking (and even better when they're arguing with me).
I've tried this little game before, though on that occasion I did it not to get people to talk, but to get a statement from players I know and can read reasonably well. A little answer to an admittedly somewhat silly question provides a great reference for later in the game. And, of course, the discussion thrives and bandwagons are born. Look how many people gave some sort of response here.
1) stopped being spiteful 2) I do this when I get involved in a game, there are many examples, and I'd think you'd prefer it to me lurking(though maybe not since I tend to get lynched when I actually like... post stuff).mith wrote:What I find interesting about your choice of response is not that you questioned and refused, but that that's all you did for the first few posts. Now, you're suddenly making longish posts. So was this legitimately not having anything to contribute, or were you lurking until you saw something to jump on?
he's the person I noticed.mith wrote:I don't understand your initial jump on Roadbird at all. He is certainly not the only person to bandwagon jump.-
-
Tyfo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 398
- Joined: October 23, 2005
- Location: Aarhus, Denmark
-
-
Flying Dutchman I never think
- I never think
- I never think
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: November 21, 2003
- Location: The land of clogs, tulips, mills, and cheese!
-
-
mith Godfather
- Godfather
- Godfather
- Posts: 9267
- Joined: March 27, 2002
- Location: McKinney, TX
Read my question again. I was asking why you weren't posting like this in the first place, not why you were posting content now. Obviously I prefer you posting to not posting.Coron wrote:and I'd think you'd prefer it to me lurking
...ok, but that doesn't justify the "case closed" attitude of your "still need more reason?" comment. Is there more reason?he's the person I noticed.
I'm leaning toward a VisMaior vote at the moment, but I'd like to hear from MoS and Roadbird again first.-
-
Coron Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: November 19, 2004
1) stopped being spiteful 2) I do this when I get involved in a game, there are many examples, and I'd think you'd prefer it to me lurking(though maybe not since I tend to get lynched when I actually like... post stuff).Coron wrote:
basically to spite you.mith wrote:
I believe I already did explain why I asked you to do this. I did it to get you to talk, or at least to judge your reaction. It should be obvious why I want you to talk; look at your first two posts (a total of three words).Coron wrote:it has yet to be explained to me why I should make the world read 25 extra useless words, besides it appears to have found me a scum.mith wrote:What I find interesting about your choice of response is not that you questioned and refused, but that that's all you did for the first few posts. Now, you're suddenly making longish posts. So was this legitimately not having anything to contribute, or were you lurking until you saw something to jump on?
as far as I can tell this should answer all your questions.-
-
Coron Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Shameless Plug
- Posts: 5449
- Joined: November 19, 2004
as far as I can tell this should answer all your questions.Coron wrote:
basically to spite you.mith wrote:
I believe I already did explain why I asked you to do this. I did it to get you to talk, or at least to judge your reaction. It should be obvious why I want you to talk; look at your first two posts (a total of three words).Coron wrote:it has yet to be explained to me why I should make the world read 25 extra useless words, besides it appears to have found me a scum.
1) stopped being spiteful 2) I do this when I get involved in a game, there are many examples, and I'd think you'd prefer it to me lurking(though maybe not since I tend to get lynched when I actually like... post stuff).mith wrote:What I find interesting about your choice of response is not that you questioned and refused, but that that's all you did for the first few posts. Now, you're suddenly making longish posts. So was this legitimately not having anything to contribute, or were you lurking until you saw something to jump on?-
-
Fritzler More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- More /in than you!
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: July 26, 2005
-
-
armlx Most JDTay-like
- Most JDTay-like
- Most JDTay-like
- Posts: 13500
- Joined: February 25, 2005
-
-
Mastermind of Sin Cassandra Complex
- Cassandra Complex
- Cassandra Complex
- Posts: 15163
- Joined: October 30, 2004
- Location: Sleeping with the Godfather's Daughter
-
-
RoadBird Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 86
- Joined: May 27, 2002
- Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Ouch....mith wrote:Yikes, it's been a while, I'd forgotten how incoherent Roadbird is...
I don't care what your recollection of events is. You are willing to lynch me over a memory that is incorrect, but I'm not allowed to have an oppinion on day-one tactics. Well, I'm using it even if you get me lynched over and over again.mith wrote:Might I suggest that you haven't seen better tactics because you have been too busy not paying attention to the game during day 1?
(And from the one game I remember playing with you in, you'll follow any bandwagon on day X and throw the game away because it's lynch or lose. The play style you are advocating is harmful to the town, and I am quite happy to lynch you just for that if I don't form any strong suspicions as we near the day's end. But I probably will, because I get involved instead of mindlessly bandwagoning hopping.)
Merry Christmasmith wrote:I'm leaning toward a VisMaior vote at the moment, but I'd like to hear from MoS and Roadbird again first."Roadbird you suck! You kill little kittens for fun! Die you evil Mafia scum, I'm attacking you! Run in fear!" -- Quercitron in Focused Mafia
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.