TT; Book 1: Bible Verse Mafia - Game over!

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:11 am

unvote

vote VisMaior

@Roadbird, did the Mod tell u that u had no abilities and that you won with the town?

If not, did you try to do any abilities at night(i.e. protect X, shoot Y, investigate Z, unleash the tomato of doom) ?

VisMaior · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:13 am

Which one is it?

Its: if a townie claims townie as last resort to divert a lynch, he should be lynched (except if his claim can be proven)

VisMaior · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:17 am

@Roadbird, did the Mod tell u that u had no abilities and that you won with the town?

FOS Pooky

Does this sound scummy only to me?

ISO · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:17 am

It is very rare that any claim can be "proven". I'd love to know how you think you're going to prove that your verse is as claimed, aside from getting killed.

VisMaior · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:19 am

By hiding with scum and getting killed?

ISO · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:23 am

Yes, you getting killed is pretty likely to confirm whatever your verse is. Thus "aside from getting killed". We can't sit around waiting for you to get killed to confirm your role (particularly since your claim is open to more than one interpretation, and you might be lying). If you continue to not die, we have to come to a decision on you eventually.

Thoth · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:23 am

There are so many verses to choose from that every claim is doubtful.

I agree that VisMaior's behaviour is very strange. I'm not convinced of RoadBird's innocence, but VisMaior has passed him on my list for now.

unvote:RoadBird
vote: VisMaior

PS: I saw mith still mentioning the deadline, but according to Cad's last post it was retracted.

VisMaior · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:26 am

If you continue to not die, we have to come to a decision on you eventually.

true.

unvote

Tough I dont see any protown reason to do that right now. you risk a posible doc here.

Cadmium · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:31 am

Vote count:

4 LyingBrian (Fuldu, Commodore Amazing, RoadBird, Fritzler)

5 RoadBird (Dragon Phoenix, LyingBrian, EnderX, Coron, Kerplunk)

1 Dragon Phoenix (inHimshallibe)
3 VisMaior (mith, PookyTheMagicalBear, Thoth)

not voting (3): LoudmouthLee, VisMaior, VitaminR

9 to lynch.

ISO · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:31 am

Thoth, I believe Roadbird simply because, unless the Mod specifically told him the claim was safe (and the rules imply that he wouldn't do this), the odds of him falsely claiming a verse which is identical to my own are not very good (there's over 30,000 verses). I doubt anyone picked up on my day 1 hints (posts 56 and 96), and if Roadbird had he would've come out with his verse much earlier than he did.

RoadBird · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:31 am

@mith: Why did you do that?!

@Pooky: If it says I have no night choice. Next time I get such a message I'll try to start the improbability drive.

VisMaior · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:32 am

So you claim your verse is identical?

RoadBird · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:01 am

No he claims verse 107:31. I claim 107:8. Those are different verses with the same content. I missed out on his hints.

VisMaior · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:04 am

Oh, I see now. That is something that prooves you and him, for now.

Thoth · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:46 am

Yes, missed the hints. Sorry.

Fritzler · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:16 am

RoadBird wrote:@mith: Why did you do that?!

To save a pro town player from being lynched. Unless it turns out your both scum, but didn't know it, and get choices when the highest ranked scum or w/e dies. That would be funny.

Unvote, Vote: VisMaior

You've been unable to show why you've been shifting so much.

LoudmouthLee · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:28 am

LyingBrian wrote:that's EXACTLY my point, VitaminR! if he's NOT a vanilla townie, then he must have a role... we can reasonably assume that armlx was pro-town... 3 of the 4 people who have died so far have BLACK text following their names... and everybody knows that pro-town roles make up the biggest percentage of players... i think we can also reasonably assume that armlx's verse is the vanilla townie verse... which brings me back to my question...

what is RoadBird's role based on the verse he claimed? a "thanker"?

Lying, you seem to misunderstand the point here, and it makes me think that YOU have a different role than some other people.

Vote: LyingBrian

Fritzler · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:33 am

Gah, I want to lynch VisMaior and LB. I'm having trouble deciding.

LoudmouthLee · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:04 am

Fritzler wrote:Gah, I want to lynch VisMaior and LB. I'm having trouble deciding.

Want a hint, Fritz? LB basically said he "couldn't understand" why someone was innocent (Roadbird)... why do you think that is?

Fritzler · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:07 am

LoudmouthLee wrote:
Fritzler wrote:Gah, I want to lynch VisMaior and LB. I'm having trouble deciding.
Want a hint, Fritz? LB basically said he "couldn't understand" why someone was innocent (Roadbird)... why do you think that is?

Unvote, Vote:LB

<That was for LML

LyingBrian · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 10:04 am

unvote

i need to reread in order to find a good candidate for my vote... although i must say i like VisMaior's bandwagon...

@LoudmouthLee

do you mind clarifying the point then?.. at the point at which i said that mith had not claimed yet... how would you interpret RoadBird's verse in light of this being a Mafia game w/o the context of mith's verse?.. it would seem that mith, RoadBird, and whoever else are townies able to confirm each other... also, i never IMPLIED that i "couldn't understand" why someone was innocent, i SAID that i "couldn't understand" what his role was... BIG difference... twisting MY words to fit YOUR context

NOTED

...

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 10:12 am

Unvote Roadbird

Time for a re-read.

RoadBird · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 10:35 am

@Fritzler: Becasue mith claimed he gave a thrid person away as well, but since all four are known maybe it's best.

I'm not willing to vote for VisMaior. I still believe his claim. I'm sticking with LyingBrian. Twisting words and then blaming someone for doing it is added to the list of reasons.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 11:48 am

hmm

very interesting

unvote

vote lyingbrian

LoudmouthLee · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:02 pm

LyingBrian wrote:
unvote

@LoudmouthLee

do you mind clarifying the point then?.. at the point at which i said that mith had not claimed yet... how would you interpret RoadBird's verse in light of this being a Mafia game w/o the context of mith's verse?.. it would seem that mith, RoadBird, and whoever else are townies able to confirm each other... also, i never IMPLIED that i "couldn't understand" why someone was innocent, i SAID that i "couldn't understand" what his role was... BIG difference... twisting MY words to fit YOUR context
NOTED
...

oh, so you thought he was innocent, yet you kept your vote on him? Keep me noted. I should just go through the thread for you to answer all of your known falsehoods in one area.

Your last sentence, sir, states the following...

i never IMPLIED that i "couldn't understand" why someone was innocent, i SAID that i "couldn't understand" what his role was... BIG difference...

and we have cad's Vote Count:

Vote count:

4 LyingBrian (Fuldu, Commodore Amazing, RoadBird, Fritzler)
5 RoadBird (Dragon Phoenix, LyingBrian, EnderX, Coron, Kerplunk)
1 Dragon Phoenix (inHimshallibe)
3 VisMaior (mith, PookyTheMagicalBear, Thoth)

not voting (3): LoudmouthLee, VisMaior, VitaminR

9 to lynch.

So you unvoted (your vote was ON RB) saying that you never questioned his innocence?

Bull-Poo. You're deer-in-headlights scum.