Standard MS Ruleset... a starting point.

This forum is for discussion related to the game.
User avatar
LoudmouthLee
LoudmouthLee
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
LoudmouthLee
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2653
Joined: February 15, 2005
Location: New York City
Contact:

Standard MS Ruleset... a starting point.

Post Post #0 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 5:17 am

Post by LoudmouthLee »

Since I began modding games, I have always used the same ruleset, which was absolutely (and shamelessly) stolen from DP.

I will go through these rules one by one, as I feel they're a good rule set.

THE RULES:

[01] Have fun and don't be a jerk. Please have consideration for the other players and the mod, and actually PLAY the game by posting and voting.

(I like this one, simple but necessary to say)

[02] No communication outside the thread unless your role allows you to do so and then only in the game's nights.

(Again, stated correctly and clearly)

[03] Get your choices in before the deadlines. If not, a random choice will be made for the first night, and no choice for subsequent nights.

(This one is up for debate)

[04] No quoting my or others PM's. No paraphrasing of winning conditions either.

(correct)

[05] If you're dead YOU'RE DEAD. No more posting relevant information after that.

(I'm a fan of the "no bah post)

[06] Lynching will be carried out once a regular majority is reached - and cannot be undone by unvoting. If I impose a day deadline, lynching will require at least half of the regular majority. In case of a tie, first come first served. In the endgame (6 or less) only a real majority will result in a lynch.

(I like this rule)

[07] Only votes in BOLD will be counted. Please clearly unvote if you want to change your vote, although I will still count your vote if you don't.

(Up for discussion. I wouldn't be against making people unvote)

[08] Do NOT edit or delete your posts! If you made a coding error, just post again.

(obvious)

[09] Do NOT post in invisible text.

(More of a problem on the GL) :)

[10] If you know you will not be checking the thread for a period of 72 hours or more, it would be nice if you would post that beforehand.

(Right)

[11] If you're out of the game, you may come back as substitute - only if you do not talk to other players about the game after your death of course.

(I like that, as well, this may need to be edited about power roles not being able to replace)

[12] The mod is always right. Accept the decisions, and if you want to discuss them, take it to email, or do so after the game has finished

(Yeah...)

Standard rules, but it encompasses all the main points.

Any additions / changes / deletes?
User avatar
Iammars
Iammars
Mers I am not
User avatar
User avatar
Iammars
Mers I am not
Mers I am not
Posts: 2362
Joined: January 9, 2005
Location: Mars... duh.

Post Post #1 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:33 am

Post by Iammars »

Well, I like the bah! Post, but whatever.

Also, if they don't send in a choice, don't give them one. Whether its Night 1 or not.
"Rolefishing is fishing for someones role. It's called fishing because it requires subtlety. When you grab a shotgun and start firing into the water, thats not fishing." - IH
User avatar
Mr Stoofer
Mr Stoofer
Less than scum
User avatar
User avatar
Mr Stoofer
Less than scum
Less than scum
Posts: 3827
Joined: February 25, 2005
Location: London Alignment: Lawful Evil

Post Post #2 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:41 am

Post by Mr Stoofer »

I like a "bah" post

I also think that the rules should explicitly allow twilight posting, for reasons given
here
.
User avatar
Dragon Phoenix
Dragon Phoenix
Don't shoot the mod
User avatar
User avatar
Dragon Phoenix
Don't shoot the mod
Don't shoot the mod
Posts: 3245
Joined: April 1, 2002
Location: Kampen. Yeah.
Contact:

Post Post #3 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:06 am

Post by Dragon Phoenix »

Iammars wrote:Also, if they don't send in a choice, don't give them one. Whether its Night 1 or not.
I chose my rule because you sometimes have the problem that a player does not show up at all. Rather than holding the whole game up whilst lokking for a substitute, you can assign a random choice.
User avatar
Mr. Flay
Mr. Flay
Metatron
User avatar
User avatar
Mr. Flay
Metatron
Metatron
Posts: 24969
Joined: March 12, 2004
Location: Gormenghast
Contact:

Post Post #4 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:12 am

Post by Mr. Flay »

I think #3 is customizable depending on game balance/structure; ditto the replacement rule (#11).

#5 - I like a bah post, but serious penalties for revealing game-based information (cop reveals innocent after death, innocent dies to a falling piano that night, etc)

#6 - I've started using Polotet/DS' plurality voting rule, which requires a certain minimum number of votes for deadline lynch, AND that that total be at least 50% of the total cast votes. This is different from the "more than 50%" rule for regular lynches. I like something explicit about not using deadline lynches at endgame, but that may reveal too much about the setup. Perhaps the mod should have this as an internal rule?
Mr Stoofer wrote:I also think that the rules should explicitly allow twilight posting, for reasons given
here
.
And apparently we need an explicit definition of when "night" begins, as some scum seem to think it starts with the lynching vote, not the death scene/locking of thread.
Retired as of October 2014.
User avatar
VisMaior
VisMaior
Flip Out!
User avatar
User avatar
VisMaior
Flip Out!
Flip Out!
Posts: 3776
Joined: June 22, 2005
Location: Budapest

Post Post #5 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:35 am

Post by VisMaior »

I dont really understand the necessity of the unvote thing. Why is it necessary?
"logic is in the eye of the beholder" -LyingBrian in Eyewitness 1
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
User avatar
mith
mith
Godfather
User avatar
User avatar
mith
Godfather
Godfather
Posts: 9267
Joined: March 27, 2002
Location: McKinney, TX
Contact:

Post Post #6 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:42 am

Post by mith »

Unvoting, like bolding votes, is simply to make life easier for the mod (and the other players).

How the game goes *should* be determined solely by the intent of the player; if I mean to be voting for someone, it shouldn't matter whether I bold it, unvote, or put it in red surrounded by smilies, so long as it's clear that I'm voting. It's better to have a clear rule in place though rather than trying to figure out player intent. At least until automatic vote counts.

(Can you tell what I've been thinking about lately?)
User avatar
Yosarian2
Yosarian2
(shrug)
User avatar
User avatar
Yosarian2
(shrug)
(shrug)
Posts: 16394
Joined: March 28, 2005
Location: New Jersey
Happy Scumday!

Post Post #7 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:01 am

Post by Yosarian2 »

The thing is, whatever rules are listed, should be the rules enforced by the mod, with no exceptions. If the rules say "All votes must be bold, or they don't count" and someone says
vote:someone[/i] two minutes before the deadline, then the mod shouldn't count it. Why? Because that kind of thing could be used as a gambit to make it look like you were trying to vote for a person without actually doing it. It may have been a gambit, or it may have been an honest mistake; either way, that has to be left up to the players to decide later. All the mod has to do is to enforce the rules as they are written; a mod should not even try to figure out the intent of the player in making his decisions.
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie
User avatar
Dourgrim
Dourgrim
Yep. Again.
User avatar
User avatar
Dourgrim
Yep. Again.
Yep. Again.
Posts: 875
Joined: February 12, 2003
Location: Elkhorn, WI
Happy Birthday!
Contact:

Post Post #8 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:16 am

Post by Dourgrim »

Hear hear, Yosarian!
[size=75]The point of the journey is not to arrive...[/size]
User avatar
PolarBoy
PolarBoy
Sir Not-Appearing-In-This-Mafia
User avatar
User avatar
PolarBoy
Sir Not-Appearing-In-This-Mafia
Sir Not-Appearing-In-This-Mafia
Posts: 358
Joined: February 28, 2003

Post Post #9 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 12:56 pm

Post by PolarBoy »

I don't even use a standard set of rules accross all of my games. It seems to me that one of the benefits of taking turns modding is that we don't need a standard set of rules, as everyone gets a chance to run things their way.
MUNSCM Delegate for the United Kingdom
Check out the [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?HomePage]ScumWiki[/url], and while you're at it, check out [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?DocumentModeMafia]DocumentModeMafia[/url]
User avatar
Tamuz
Tamuz
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Tamuz
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2807
Joined: March 20, 2005
Location: Seattle, Washington State

Post Post #10 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:25 pm

Post by Tamuz »

11 wouldn't work too well because there is the assumption of non power role if the character comes in. This happened in a newbie in, as My Stoofer and Halfpint may remember. Stoofer's re-introduction into the game all but sentanced myself and my mafia partner to death. With 1 more assumed innocent townie because he came in pretty much took out the scape goat I was going to use that day. In essence I don't think people should ever be able to come back in unless they were replaced before a role came in. (pre-game)
Tamuz is the expression of the alienated, of the ambitious, of the dispossessed.
User avatar
inHimshallibe
inHimshallibe
SmartyPants
User avatar
User avatar
inHimshallibe
SmartyPants
SmartyPants
Posts: 7070
Joined: August 28, 2004
Location: Music City, USA

Post Post #11 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:09 pm

Post by inHimshallibe »

I happen to really like my Newbie opening post setup (of course I would, wouldn't I?), if anybody wants to template that for their Newbie games. 138 and 154 are games I ran/am running.
User avatar
mith
mith
Godfather
User avatar
User avatar
mith
Godfather
Godfather
Posts: 9267
Joined: March 27, 2002
Location: McKinney, TX
Contact:

Post Post #12 (ISO) » Sat Nov 19, 2005 12:06 am

Post by mith »

It seems to me that one of the benefits of taking turns modding is that we don't need a standard set of rules, as everyone gets a chance to run things their way.
Having a standard (or standards) wouldn't prevent some games from being run differently. Some theme games would *require* additional rules; I am never going to insist that ever mod use the same rules, because it discourages innovation. That said, it seems to me (and this is entirely unresearched, so it may be completely wrong) that most mods want to use essentially the same rules anyway. Lots of mods copy DP's rules pretty much directly. The problem is that when they do change things up, the players don't tend to read the rules anyway, and just assume that it's run a certain way. Now, granted, that's more the player's fault than the mod's. A lot of players are extremely lazy.

Still, it has always been my view that the mod is not there to determine the outcome of the game, only to enforce rules that are already in place. (As I mentioned above, actual voting is intended to be entirely up to the players; we commonly have bolding and unvoting rules listed to make things easier on the mod, not for any real gameplay reason. The mod is just there as an impartial third-party, necessary because of the secrecy factor; someone needs to tell the players what happened.) Having slightly different ways of doing things is fine and natural; the problem comes when mods decide that since it's *their* game, they can do whatever they like and you end up with completely arbitrary rules.

Anyway, I think a standard set would solve two problems: 1. For newer mods that haven't thought things through all the way, it would provide them with rules that cover everything. 2. For lazy players, most games would have the same rules, and games that didn't could have a "non-standard" label which would hopefully prod them into reading the rules for that game.
User avatar
Narninian
Narninian
Contracts STDs
User avatar
User avatar
Narninian
Contracts STDs
Contracts STDs
Posts: 1653
Joined: March 11, 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, California

Post Post #13 (ISO) » Sat Nov 19, 2005 12:14 am

Post by Narninian »

mith wrote:2. For lazy players, most games would have the same rules, and games that didn't could have a "non-standard" label which would hopefully prod them into reading the rules for that game.
yay stuff for lazy players.
The extra in is for /in
User avatar
Dragon Phoenix
Dragon Phoenix
Don't shoot the mod
User avatar
User avatar
Dragon Phoenix
Don't shoot the mod
Don't shoot the mod
Posts: 3245
Joined: April 1, 2002
Location: Kampen. Yeah.
Contact:

Post Post #14 (ISO) » Sat Nov 19, 2005 12:22 am

Post by Dragon Phoenix »

Oh, by the way, these are not fully MY rules. In addition to my own thoughts, I also copied/pasted what I saw and liked from others. I'm pretty sure rule [1] actually came from MeMe for instance.
User avatar
Iammars
Iammars
Mers I am not
User avatar
User avatar
Iammars
Mers I am not
Mers I am not
Posts: 2362
Joined: January 9, 2005
Location: Mars... duh.

Post Post #15 (ISO) » Sat Nov 19, 2005 9:25 am

Post by Iammars »

Yeah. I try to write my rules with funny stuff in it to encourage players to read the rules.
But most of mine are copied from Blackberry.
"Rolefishing is fishing for someones role. It's called fishing because it requires subtlety. When you grab a shotgun and start firing into the water, thats not fishing." - IH
User avatar
Mr. Flay
Mr. Flay
Metatron
User avatar
User avatar
Mr. Flay
Metatron
Metatron
Posts: 24969
Joined: March 12, 2004
Location: Gormenghast
Contact:

Post Post #16 (ISO) » Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:45 pm

Post by Mr. Flay »

I think I based the set I use most often from Werebear... except for Newbie Games, which I rewrote almost entirely to be clearer for new players. But I also frequently change up the rules, and will even ask players to confirm in their confirmation PM that they've read and understood the changes.
Retired as of October 2014.
Post Reply

Return to “Mafia Discussion”