In post 1698, Mitillos wrote:@Nacho: So, HD is bussing me in a stagnant game and that makes no sense, but I'm bussing zab in the same stagnant game and it does make sense?
timing.
HD went from strong town read to bussing you as soon as momentum turns against you? Probably not.
You turn against zab who you've been interacting with minimally for the entire game along with some soft-distancing? Hell. Yes.
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:58 pm
by N
CF Riot has been prodded.
Deadline is suspended.
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:04 pm
by Nachomamma8
N where are you getting these from?
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:09 pm
by CF Riot
I just read the thread a second ago. I'm here. Nothing is happening. If we're going to lynch Zab we should just do it, not make someone replace in then get lynched. You set it, I'll spike it.
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:10 pm
by Human Destroyer
Fuck it I'm bored and they're probably scum together anyway
UNVOTE: VOTE: zab
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:11 pm
by Mitillos
@Nacho: I had lower activity on D1, zab had lower activity on every other day. It makes perfect sense that our interactions would be minimal, particularly when you remember that he got prodded 5 times. And calling our interaction soft-distancing assumes that we're scumpartners to begin with, which begs the question. How exactly do you differentiate a minor scumread from distancing, when you (supposedly) don't know the alignments of those involved?
Did I also turn against kmd in the same way? If so, are you saying that I am systematically attacking my own scum-partners? If you believe I'm this suicidal, why not help me get rid of the second one, by voting zab?
p-edit: Shouldn't we let him claim or something first?
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:11 pm
by Human Destroyer
How is he going to claim if he isn't here and probably won't be coming back
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:12 pm
by Human Destroyer
Like I'd agree with you had this not been a player who lurked out and who no one seems to want to replace
Sooooooo
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:12 pm
by Mitillos
I just don't like hammers without claims. We've had one of those in this game already...
Oh well, he's most likely scum anyway, so whatever, hammer him and get it over with.
Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:15 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 1705, Mitillos wrote:If you believe I'm this suicidal, why not help me get rid of the second one, by voting zab?
It's just that I was too lazy to go dig it up again
Can you give me your thoughts on posts from Kmd after that point and/or not related to attacking you in some way, shape, or form?
In post 1227, ProHawk wrote:Completely ignored anything I said. Is just skimming and taking it easy, which isn't scummy in and of itself, but when combined with the crap he wrote against me earlier, it makes sense as scum.
And yes, when you do flip scum, this will be an easy scum-team kill.
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:10 pm
by Mitillos
I kind of expected Bacde to die, what with being conf-town, after yesterday's flip. I'm thinking scum killed CF to throw suspicion on me. This makes me think HD isn't the remaining scum.
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 9:24 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 1723, Mitillos wrote:I kind of expected Bacde to die, what with being conf-town, after yesterday's flip. I'm thinking scum killed CF to throw suspicion on me. This makes me think HD isn't the remaining scum.
this is stupid.
Vote: Mitillos
I don't like how you played the "I feel uncomfortable with him getting hammered without a claim" card, yet didn't unvote at all to prevent that from happening. Why not?
