Page 13 of 173

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:12 pm
by xRECKONERx
doesn't matter, crypto rejected it, discussion can stop i think

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:30 pm
by Ythan
Is that actually going to be a thing with the new fairy?

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:32 pm
by TheButtonmen
People not getting titles they don't want?

Yes.

Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:48 pm
by crypto
you guys try way too hard about your titles and it makes them worse than they could be

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 2:33 am
by shaft.ed
nominate Chevre for killjoy

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 2:44 am
by zoraster
titles aren't about deserving something or not. They are not awards.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:27 am
by izakthegoomba
In post 308, zoraster wrote:titles aren't about deserving something or not. They are not awards.

This. If a title fits a particular user well enough, I believe it should be given regardless of whether or not they are considered a "positive" presence on the site.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:31 am
by TheButtonmen
Since everyone seems to be really slow on the uptake I'm going to make this clear the next person who comes here solely to complain about someone being nomed or to use my thread to oh so cleverly be passive aggressive towards someone is being removed. Zoraster and Izak speak words of wisdom you should all listen to them, this thread is for titling I don't care about whatever drama or ill-will you feel towards each other.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 5:31 am
by TheButtonmen
Mykonian
is getting a 1 week temp ban from this sub-forum.

How droll.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:36 am
by Mr. Flay
In post 301, Ythan wrote:Is that actually going to be a thing with the new fairy?
In post 302, TheButtonmen wrote:People not getting titles they don't want?

Yes.
This has always been true of Title Fairy.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:50 am
by izakthegoomba
I believe Ythan meant whether people will stop discussing it, actually.

Example: LOL LET'S GIVE PARAMA A TITLE CUZ HE DOESNT WANT ONE!!!1!11!!!1

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:57 am
by Ythan
Clever Goomba.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:26 am
by Mr. Flay
Oh. IDGI then... we always try to stop people from discussing dead titles/completely offtopic crap in TF threads. It sometimes works (usually better when the TF isn't burnt out, cf: Oman in late 2012)

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:36 am
by Kublai Khan
Nominate Mr. Flay ->
Metatron


He regularly has to speak for mith and the War in Heaven series. Plus he's wanted a new one.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:39 am
by Ythan
Is Metatron referenced in the games or just angels generally?

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:47 am
by izakthegoomba
In post 313, Kublai Khan wrote:Nominate Mr. Flay ->
Metatron


He regularly has to speak for mith and the War in Heaven series. Plus he's wanted a new one.

2nd


Though other recognisable angel names could work just as well or better.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:48 am
by Mr. Flay
I seriously read that as
Megatron
at first... :P

No objections (and yes, Metatron was a role in the second game).

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:49 am
by Xalxe
In post 316, Mr. Flay wrote:I seriously read that as
Megatron
at first... :P

No objections (and yes, Metatron was a role in the second game).


Hell, I did until this post.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:57 am
by Mr. Flay
In post 317, Xalxe wrote:
In post 316, Mr. Flay wrote:I seriously read that as
Megatron
at first... :P

No objections (and yes, Metatron was a role in the second game).


Hell, I did until this post.

You should get your eyes checked
(sorry, Buttons)

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:59 am
by Ythan
To be clear Metatron is a scribe, not a herald, everywhere but in Dogma.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:03 am
by Kublai Khan
In post 319, Ythan wrote:To be clear Metatron is a scribe, not a herald, everywhere but in Dogma.

I know, but as Rickman says in Dogma "if it's not in a movie, it's not worth knowing."

But, still.. a high-ranking archangel and War In Heaven games, and he likes it. Not perfect, but titles can't all be perfect.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:04 am
by Ythan
They can at least be good.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:05 am
by TheButtonmen
I really like it.

In post 321, Ythan wrote:They can at least be good.


What do you dislike about it, do you think the core idea is good or do you have any suggestions about other ways to take it? I appreciate all feedback but feedback without context is pretty useless.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:05 am
by Ythan
I guess it's a net gain vs. WiKid.

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:06 am
by SleepyKrew
If he speaks to and is the messenger of God,
Gabriel
?